Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pax Numbers For Airports After 09/11  
User currently offlineRizzibird From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 235 posts, RR: 2
Posted (14 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

We have already discussed the pax numbers for certain carriers after the tragic events of September 11th, but I think no one has given numbers for airports so far (correct me if I am wrong). So lets see which airports are affected the most, post any numbers you get.
Today I got those for FRA and MUC. Passengers at FRA in September were down 7,2 Percent compared to the same month last year, for MUC it is 3,6 Percent. Overall passengers for the year so far are up 1,4 Percent at FRA and more than 6 Percent at MUC.
Please post any numbers you can get!


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSilverWing From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2188 times:

Figures for BRE:
Passengers in September are down 5.4% compared to Sep 00. For the year numbers are down 2.1%.
Source: http://www.airport-bremen.de/2000/statistik/sta.html

User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7809 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (14 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2179 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Edited from today's Manchester Evening News:

PASSENGER numbers at Manchester Airport were up on the year last month despite the havoc wreaked to services by the terror attacks in the United States.
A total of 63,000 more travellers passed through the terminals than in September last year.

However, the 3.05 per cent growth rate was around half that of previous months this year, indicating times are not as good as they would have been.

Ringway handled 2,111,000 passengers compared with 2,048,000 in September last year.

Charter services enjoyed the biggest rise, by seven per cent from 1,274.000 to 1,191,000, as people took holidays they had booked in advance.

At Manchester, flight cancellations to North America immediately after the New York and Washington outrages caused a fall in long-haul travel.

The number of passengers who flew directly to North America last month fell from 114,885 to 102,154.

Overall, international scheduled passenger figures were only slightly down, from 606,541 to 606,500.

Short-haul European flights enjoyed an upsurge, suggesting people who were planning leisure breaks in the US switched to continental destinations.

On domestic routes, numbers were down by eight per cent from 250,000 to 230,000. Services to London were particularly hit because fewer passengers connected to US-bound flights at Heathrow and Gatwick, and business travel reduced overall. Last year’s figures were high because travellers switched to the air during the fuel crisis.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Flights Have Been Canceled After 09/11? posted Thu Nov 8 2001 03:23:20 by Neo
Airport Pax/Cargo Numbers For 2005? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 15:16:05 by A342
Whats The Break-even Point For Pax Numbers? posted Sun Sep 11 2005 21:33:15 by Grimey
YUL Surpasses YYZ For March Pax Numbers posted Tue Apr 1 2003 13:55:33 by VonRichtofen
UAL/AA - Special Announcements For 09/11 posted Tue Sep 10 2002 15:56:03 by Tripleseven
Security At US Airports After 9/11 posted Wed Dec 19 2001 05:36:51 by DLMCO
09/11/01: 11th Worst 1-Day Death Toll Ever For Av. posted Mon Sep 17 2001 04:30:41 by Lax
AKL Reports 3rd Quarter Profits And Pax Numbers posted Wed Oct 25 2006 11:42:23 by 777ER
Signs For Airports That Are No Longer There? posted Sun Oct 8 2006 03:51:29 by Falstaff
Tail Numbers For Two US Air Flights From 7/29 posted Sun Jul 30 2006 22:10:08 by Cadet57