Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Future Of DEN  
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1260 times:

Ever since the letter that Goodwin sent out to all UA employees leaked out, the fate of UA now looks quite negative.

As you all know, DEN is UA's second largest hub, and is very close behind ORD.

Some facts about DEN:

1. Its the 10th busiest airport in the world.
2. Its the 2nd largest airport in the world in terms of acreage and the largest in the US.
3. Its the most expensive airport in the US.
4. 80% of DEN is UA.
5. UA has 60 gates in DEN, a whole concourse plus a little of another.
6. Its UA's gateway to the midwest-west
7. Its outgrown itself in just 5 years.
8. There is not a single empty gate left.

If UA does indeed belly up, DEN will become a ghost airport, and all of the facts I mentioned above will become facts of the past. DEN would become a ghost airport.

I really hope UA doesn't go under as they are my prefered airline to fly in the US, and have had many great experiences.

However, as I said 80% of DEN is UA. Without UA, DEN will drop by 80% in terms of operations.

What do you think will be the future of DEN if UA does indeed belly up? ORD is not a huge issue as it is already heavily served by other airlines and is a hub for AA.

Ever since Goodwin announced this, there have been a lot of rumors going around about CO or DL acquiring the DEN hub.

DL, I can't really see as they have a hub in SLC.
CO I can see since DEN was one of there hubs in the past.

However these are rumors and are most probably not true.

I think its a bit too early to begin to speculate.

So what do you all think will be the future of DEN if UA indeed does belly up? Do you think its hub will be picked up by another major carrier? Or will DEN remain a ghost airport?

Regards.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline48v From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1198 times:

Bear in mind that a substantial percentage (40 percent?) of Denver's traffic is O&D, so if United were to cease operations there would be a huge vacuum to fill. If that were to happen, first off Frontier just won the lottery. Expect to see them expand as fast as they can afford to, probably snapping up some of UA's now-surplus A319/320s and maybe even 737s. Probably most of the other carriers would add extra flights to their hubs. It takes a while to set up a hub.

Maybe USAirways would finally get a hub in the western US. Hey, they already have a concourse full of Stephen Wolf style grey - no need to change the carpet or ticket counters!


User currently offlineScannerson From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1182 times:

Look for the fares to go down to den. With out the monoploy of UA. Otheres would fill in there place. TWA filed for bancurpucy tons of times, but they were stil going. So look for ua to do the same

Rob


User currently offlineUs330 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 3866 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1146 times:

Trust me. If UA files for bankruptcy, and ceases operation, you willl see increased service by many carriers. Granted, another carrier may not make DEN a large hub as UA did, but the vaccuum will be filled.

User currently offlineNiteRider30 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 150 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1133 times:

I'm sure Frontier is licking their chops at the prospect of UA going under. Of course, I don't think they are hoping for it, but it would certainly give a Frontier a HUGE boost... #1 being able to use UA's old gates, #2 UA has a somewhat similar fleet (737s and A319/320s) that they would be able to get secondhand. Frontier won't fill up DEN like UA does, but I'm sure somebody will pick up the slack.

NiteRider30


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1106 times:

I will agree with Us330. If(emphasis on if) United does go down, I don't think you will see another carrier ever be as dominant at Denver as United was. I do think though, that the void will be filled, largely by Frontier, and possibly 3 or 4 other airlines.
This might also be Frontiers' chance to get even bigger and possibly move to concourse B. If Frontier keeps expanding, it might make DEN a low-fare hub. True, DEN does have higher gate costs, but if Frontier really expands, you could see prices slashed.
rgds,
blink182



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineN17085 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1099 times:

DEN is one of my favorite airports. I love the free e-mail. Also, the CO President's Club there in Terminal A is great! I got to fly on a UA 722 out of there. I love that old bird.

User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1098 times:

Remember, the UA dooms-day letter has much to do with union negotiations and UA getting its costs under control. While it is an extremely difficult time for the airlines, and UA seems to be having a more difficult time than most, they will be around for a long time to come even if they have to reorganize under the bankruptcy code at some point.

User currently offlineDasa From East Timor, joined Aug 2001, 760 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1079 times:

Regarding DEN being the most expensive airport in the USA to operate out of, I was reading an article about the opening of DEN in Airways magazine, I believe it was an issue from 1995... the article stated that DEN had the second-highest per passenger cost after JFK.

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1073 times:

Thats true Dasa.

They've slowly been going down over the years though.

Also since 9/11, they've given the airlines a "break" by lowering costs SIGNIFICANTLY.

I will TRY to find some numbers for you all.

Regards.



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Future Of Air Travel posted Fri Mar 23 2007 04:07:16 by Tockeyhockey
Is The Future Of Bmi In Manchester? posted Sun Jan 21 2007 12:46:03 by BestWestern
The Future Of Sun Country Airlines posted Fri Jan 19 2007 17:33:22 by Saab2000
The Future Of Air Wisconsin? posted Wed Jan 3 2007 19:28:55 by Saab2000
Sugestions About The Future Of OA posted Tue Dec 26 2006 21:16:39 by 1981
ADS-B The Future Of Radar? posted Mon Nov 20 2006 19:58:42 by Mpdpilot
The Future Of Alliances (post Merger Frenzy) posted Fri Nov 17 2006 12:09:40 by B777A340Fan
Regional Airlines RFPs And The Future Of Them posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:39:34 by Apodino
The Future Of CWL-BRU? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 01:31:41 by Cwldude
Braniff's View Of The Future Of Air Travel posted Tue Oct 10 2006 15:52:30 by OPNLguy