Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue Picture  
User currently offlineTrey From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 250 posts, RR: 5
Posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1280 times:

just saw a jetBlue picture, i think they could have done a much better job. it's kinda plain and boring.

look on the this site. picture is on the right hand side.
www.justplanes.com
later

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAa737 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 849 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 892 times:

I also just saw the picture of the jetblue palne. I thought it was horrible. Thye could have come up with something much better. I didn't like the shades of blue on the tailfin.

User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 875 times:

Hmm. Not bad, if a little on the starchy and boring side.

User currently offlineAirT85 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 864 times:

hi All! I like there scheme! Its contempory, nice, attractive, although it could be jazzed up a bit, its cheap, not a lot of paint, and this airline isnt even off the ground so, they need all the cash they can get, although they have quite a bit! I like blue, so i like ther plane. i just want to know, do they expect to fill 150 seats how-ever-many-times-a-day they fly the A-320 to Rochester, NY from JFK?! I think even the A-319, seating 124 would be a little much! But hwo knows, it might work out. I like there scheme. Then again, i also love SWA's too 
-Tony


User currently offlineOH-LGA From Denmark, joined Oct 1999, 1436 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 856 times:

Well, it's certainly not the worst color scheme on the market... it's not that bad. Plus, this is the airline that's going to offer cheap fares from JFK and have live satellite TV available to every leather seat on board... I think the jetBlue logo would look nice billboard style (similar to sabena's scheme), but otherwise... it's not bad.

Moi,
Kai



Head in the clouds... yet feet planted firmly on the ground.
User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 846 times:

Why? Because it's simple. That's why I like AA's scheme so much as opposed to UA or US. Anyway, I think they've got a good look going here. I hope they do well!

-Scott
San Diego, CA


User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 846 times:

...to elaborate on the simplicity issue. My feeling is this: an aircraft should look light and sleek - it's a flying machine afterall. Anyway, the lighter the scheme, the lighter and more graceful an airplane appears to be. I mentioned that I didn't care for UA's or US's schemes in my earlier post. They are nice, but they are just so HEAVY (both visually and physically).

Just my $.02...

-Scott


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11273 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 830 times:

I don't understand the idea of a plane's paint being heavy. US's and UA's and JetBlue's liveries all contain the same amount of paint, and it weighs virtually the same for the different colors. The only airline that doesn't paint its planes is AA.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 809 times:

Well, when I say 'heavy', I'm referring to aesthetics. Dark colors look heavy...light colors look light. But you're right...I didn't mean to say that white paint is physically lighter than white paint.

-Scott


User currently offlineATA757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 809 times:

Overall it's good looking, but instead of having the name with stripes on the tail they should have put a logo (if they even have one). At least it's not to 'busy' looking!

I am looking forward to their service to Indianapolis, I would like to go to JFK ASAP (on jB)

ATA757
Pendleton, IN


User currently offlineNAL757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 810 times:

None of us has to like the paint scheme, but once we see the prices, service, routes, etc. we won't have a better alternative. JetBlue will blow us all away!

NAL757


User currently offlineFlyCMH From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 2281 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 804 times:

jetBlue's paint scheme is sleek and contemporary. It's not eloboratly decorated, no just a plane white aircraft. Overall, I think it's pretty nice. The shades of blue on the tail appear a little akward, but I still think it looks nice. I can't wait to see them in Columbus, they will have the only nonstop flights from Columbus to JFK.

User currently offlineB777 From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 368 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 805 times:

All I can say is......
It's pretty nice. Sometimes, simplicity is better. Besides, most people wouldn't care much about the color scheme if the fares are down right cheap.

James


User currently offlineWoxof From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 9 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 791 times:

What's wrong with it?????
Sort of reminds me of Penn State's football uniforms.
Clean and simple.


User currently offlineMdsmith11 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 194 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 789 times:

The picture of jet Blue's new A/C has the four wheeled main landing gear. If memory serves me correctly, only Air India's A-320's were delivered with that option. They purchased their A-320's with four wheeled landing gear so as to not be so rough on the plane upon their apparantly rough runway surfaces.

Ha ha, I was the first one to spot/post a notice on this!


User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 775 times:

I just saw a press advisory from JetBlue saying the design is the first of three different tail schemes. Stay tuned...


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 758 times:

Oh man does that scheme blow!!

**Does anyone else think the tail looks like Volare's?***

FLY777UAL


User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 764 times:

It appears to have the standard 2 wheel main gear trucks... Thats a optical illusion, making both geat trucks seem to be one.

User currently offlineRWally From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 555 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 759 times:

There was a whole article about JetBlue a couple months back in Airways magazine.

User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1264 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 742 times:

I am surprised none of the UA fans are upset at JETBLUE copying alittle of UA's livery. Then again,so did TWA. I don't know about all you folks,but I am getting a little tired of the bottom paint job. You know,solid color on the bottom of the aircraft ala BA,TWA,UA,Canadian air,AWA and so on.

What ever happen to the stripe down the side of the aircraft? Oh well,just my two cents.


User currently offlineCPAir 4 life From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 743 times:

I can't believe what you said!
BA and Canadian had their paint jobs way before United switched to their current livery!!! ( I am more familiar with Canadians situation)
Canadians started with there Canadian Pacific planes in 1987 before they were bought by PWA.
The reason that no UA fans are upset, is because there is nothing to be upset about.

I can't see how jet blue copied UA in any way, they don't own the right to have a solid blue on the bottom of the planes.

That is my 2 cents


User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1264 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 733 times:

Thanks CPAir4life (you must love 'em) for the timeline correction. In the eigthies,and early nineties many carriers went to the "plain white" look. Lufstansa,Air Canada and Quantas Air to name a few. I hope this trend moves on and the "old stripe down the side" comes back again.

We are talking about aesthetics here,so in the end it really does not matter,but again,this my opinion (and its free too.)


User currently offlineCharterFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 736 times:

Hi,

I find it absolutely boring. No logo, almost no colors... and what a strange name!

I think the worst thing in this paint scheme is the markings. They are too small. We almost don't see "jet".

But, as many others have stated, the most important are the prices and the in-flight service. I they are a good alternative to major carriers, then their paint scheme will surely not keep me from flying them.

Regards,

CharterFlyer


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Jetblue 320 Picture With Cowl Missing posted Fri Sep 2 2005 04:30:38 by Babaero
Orange JetBlue De-Ice Picture & Question posted Mon Dec 22 2003 17:00:54 by DIA
JetBlue Applies To Serve BOS-CUN In 2007 posted Fri Dec 1 2006 22:54:39 by PlaneGuy27
JetBlue: Hola Cancun! posted Fri Dec 1 2006 00:28:01 by JetBlueAUS
JetBlue Commercial posted Thu Nov 30 2006 18:21:25 by Inthesky74
And So It Begins, JetBlue To Cancun On Nov. 30th posted Tue Nov 28 2006 18:07:53 by Juventus
Flying Tomorrow? JetBlue Will Buy You A Beer! posted Thu Nov 23 2006 06:09:28 by FXramper
Caribbean Airlines - First Picture posted Wed Nov 22 2006 22:35:59 by Viasa
JetBlue Ops At JFK posted Mon Nov 20 2006 17:40:24 by Captaink
JetBlue Customer Service Question posted Tue Nov 14 2006 14:54:28 by Positiverate