Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Do FedEx, Atlas Air Support Norwegian?  
User currently offlineblueflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4000 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 weeks 5 days 11 hours 32 minutes ago) and read 2979 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I recognize this is a bit of an inside baseball question, but I was wondering whether anyone could explain why FedEx Express and Atlas Air have filed a motion with the DOT supporting Norwegian's application for a foreign air carrier permit? Obviously they're not acting out of the goodness of their heart, so what interest are they trying to advance or support in the process?

http://worldairlinenews.com/2014/08/...-the-dot-to-grant-its-application/
(second paragraph mentions FedEx Express and Atlas Air)


I've got $h*t to do
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25360 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (2 weeks 5 days 10 hours 56 minutes ago) and read 2856 times:

Both carriers (along with the last 3 heads of the DOT) are of the opinions the EU-US bilateral is very clear, and the US has no grounds to reject Norwegian.
The EU-US ASA requires parties respect the determination of regulators of the otherside, so if the EU says Norwegian is EU and compliant with EU ownership and citizenship, the US must accept such determination.

On a macro scale both Fedex and Atlas are companies that have tended to long support liberalization of global aviation market and have long opposed protectionism.

[Edited 2014-08-28 22:50:00]


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineROSWELL41 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 781 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 weeks 5 days 10 hours 51 minutes ago) and read 2825 times:

Perhaps both are planning a scheme similar to Norwegians?

User currently onlineB747400ERF From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2013, 454 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 weeks 5 days 10 hours 1 minute ago) and read 2708 times:

Atlas likes hiring cheaper foreign pilots. They have used every trick in the book to create friction between Polar and Atlas groups in the past.

User currently onlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9376 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (2 weeks 5 days 9 hours 56 minutes ago) and read 2688 times:

I doubt that Atlas or Fedex would set-up passenger carriers but LAXIntl has explained it very well.

The EU could get funny ideas about FX's European network, just to mention one item



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21625 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (2 weeks 5 days 9 hours 45 minutes ago) and read 2642 times:

Quoting ROSWELL41 (Reply 2):
Perhaps both are planning a scheme similar to Norwegians?

Or they want they ability to do so. Norwegian doesn't compete with them, so they've got no reason to oppose them.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3203 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (2 weeks 5 days 9 hours 42 minutes ago) and read 2628 times:

Quoting B747400ERF (Reply 3):
Atlas likes hiring cheaper foreign pilots. They have used every trick in the book to create friction between Polar and Atlas groups in the past.

Well the only foreign base they've had was in the UK.....

But that's long in the past; that base is closed and Atlas and Polar pilots are now on the same seniority list.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 4):
I doubt that Atlas or Fedex would set-up passenger carriers but LAXIntl has explained it very well.

Atlas flies passengers.



FLYi
User currently onlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9376 posts, RR: 29
Reply 7, posted (2 weeks 5 days 9 hours 38 minutes ago) and read 2602 times:

Quoting PITrules (Reply 6):
Atlas flies passengers.

on charters and mostly DoD contracts. That's different to what Norwegian or others do.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlinetozairport From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 686 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 weeks 5 days 9 hours 7 minutes ago) and read 2491 times:

Not sure about Atlas, but it seems FedEx thinks they can leverage the NAI issue to do the same thing in Europe. I have a feeling that this will be an issue when they try to front a candidate for ALPA National President. NAI is such a cancer that the fact that an ALPA carrier would support it is disgusting.


Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
User currently onlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7371 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (2 weeks 5 days 8 hours 43 minutes ago) and read 2377 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 1):
so if the EU says Norwegian is EU and compliant with EU ownership and citizenship, the US must accept such determination.

Except Norway isn't an EU member country, the company office in Ireland is an office of convienence to allow them to get around Norwegian labor laws.


User currently offlineMillwallSean From Singapore, joined Apr 2008, 1244 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (2 weeks 5 days 8 hours 26 minutes ago) and read 2330 times:

I would assume that the lift that both companies does in Europe and then fly on to a thirds party country makes them likely to be the carriers who will feel the brunt of a European retribution in case the US denies Norwegian.

Usually self interest makes companies take a stand.

And fedex knows that after their Euro HQ move from Paris to a canton in Switzerland where they pay virtually no tax, they are thus likely to be top of the list for retribution from the EU if a block on Norwegian is enforced.

While I dont particularly care for Norwegian i struggle to see anything wrong or illegal with what they are doing. unethical yes but illegal no.
Its however unfair to hire cheap American and Asian labour (or hire Europeans on contracts in say Thailand) and fly around the world pretending to be a European airline.



No One Likes Us - We Dont Care.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21625 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (2 weeks 5 days 8 hours 6 minutes ago) and read 2276 times:

Quoting MillwallSean (Reply 10):
While I dont particularly care for Norwegian i struggle to see anything wrong or illegal with what they are doing. unethical yes but illegal no.

The problem is that the US-EU treaty arguably makes unethical actions of the sort you described illegal.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Do Airlines "hate" The ERJ / CRJ Now? posted Wed Aug 6 2014 09:06:06 by LX2IAH
Why No A330s For Air Tahiti Nui? posted Sun Jun 15 2014 01:24:47 by nickofatlanta
Why Do Airlines Change Their Names? posted Tue May 13 2014 17:35:14 by 727LOVER
Why Do Foreign Airlines Still Use NRT? posted Sun Apr 27 2014 16:07:40 by mozart
Atlas Air Acquires 3 Additional 777F's posted Mon Dec 2 2013 07:30:33 by LAXintl
Why No Flag On Air China's Aircraft? posted Tue Nov 5 2013 22:25:34 by seasons
Why Do Many Assume That AA Is Going To Cut CLT posted Tue Nov 5 2013 02:10:31 by DeltaXNA
Why Do Manufacturers Use Test Registrations? posted Sun Aug 25 2013 20:23:39 by n797mx
Atlas Air Acquires Additional Pair Of 777F posted Thu Aug 1 2013 08:35:38 by LAXintl
Why Do So Many People Here Want IFE To Be Removed? posted Sun Jul 21 2013 13:28:15 by 1337Delta764