Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
This Will Help Ua!  
User currently offlineAlexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1149 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1092 times:

Fewer A/C types. Larger A/C. Fewer number of flights. They gain or stay the same in ASM's with the larger A/C.

My UA Fleet

733 or 319/320
752 and 753
763 and 764 Int and Domestic
772 and 744 Int and Domestic

Done, that it thats all.


You mad Bro???
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9168 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

Sounds cool.

User currently offlineSchreiner From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 960 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

That will cause longer boarding time, less connections and less good-connecions... but, great thinking... think again sometime!


Soaring the internet...
User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 985 times:

Isn't that what the UA fleet would be with the exception of the 762 gone, and 753 and 764 in its place? They are retiring the 722/732 aircraft and the 742(If they have any left)

User currently offlinePSU_DTW_SCE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 956 times:

This basically is their long-range fleet plan. I don't see a reason for them to have a 763, 764, and 772. The 764 seems like an extra sub-type in there that isn't necessary. Same with the 753 as long as the 762's are flying. We'll still be seeing 733's & 735's for a while though.

User currently offlineAlexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 926 times:

Hey Schreiner!!!

God forbid, it might actually help the bottom line of UA and maybe, just maybe cut back on who knows, delays, cancelled flights, lost luggage etc.

Longer Boarding times?? Oh my what a hassle, would you rather sit on the tarmac for an hour to take-off due to the excess number on flights that could be dealt with using larger A/C???

So you please THINK again!!!



You mad Bro???
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Could US's Piggybacking Help UA Win IAD-PEK posted Fri Oct 20 2006 07:03:28 by Aamr
When Will The UA Express 120's Get The New Paint? posted Fri May 12 2006 04:03:57 by FL370
Do You Think This Will Fly? posted Fri Oct 21 2005 00:55:56 by Air380
NWA Collateral Will Help Some Lenders posted Sat Sep 17 2005 16:12:09 by KarlB737
Ama, Would It Help Ua To Have Regular Service? posted Mon Apr 25 2005 05:25:31 by Garri767
United Express Rego Help UA 6564 4/10 posted Wed Apr 13 2005 02:57:53 by Carfield
Is This The First UA 767 New Colours? posted Thu Mar 31 2005 09:20:27 by MauriceB
Flying This Week On UA, PTV? posted Mon Jan 10 2005 18:58:08 by Chrisjake
BA Managers Will Help Out At British Airports. posted Wed Sep 1 2004 02:20:40 by 777ER
MEA Lovers This Will Break Your Heart posted Sat May 29 2004 00:50:39 by AirxLiban