United Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9440 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted
Mon Oct 29 2001 15:48:40 UTC (14 years 1 month 16 hours ago) and read 1342 times:
Schreiner From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 960 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted
Mon Oct 29 2001 15:52:09 UTC (14 years 1 month 16 hours ago) and read 1336 times:
That will cause longer boarding time, less connections and less good-connecions... but, great thinking... think again sometime!
Soaring the internet...
Lowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted
Mon Oct 29 2001 19:00:16 UTC (14 years 1 month 13 hours ago) and read 1296 times:
Isn't that what the UA fleet would be with the exception of the 762 gone, and 753 and 764 in its place? They are retiring the 722/732 aircraft and the 742(If they have any left)
PSU_DTW_SCE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted
Mon Oct 29 2001 23:26:26 UTC (14 years 1 month 8 hours ago) and read 1267 times:
This basically is their long-range fleet plan. I don't see a reason for them to have a 763, 764, and 772. The 764 seems like an extra sub-type in there that isn't necessary. Same with the 753 as long as the 762's are flying. We'll still be seeing 733's & 735's for a while though.
Alexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted
Tue Oct 30 2001 07:59:22 UTC (14 years 1 month ago) and read 1237 times:
God forbid, it might actually help the bottom line of UA and maybe, just maybe cut back on who knows, delays, cancelled flights, lost luggage etc.
Longer Boarding times?? Oh my what a hassle, would you rather sit on the tarmac for an hour to take-off due to the excess number on flights that could be dealt with using larger A/C???
So you please THINK again!!!
You mad Bro???