Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swissair: "No Alliances, Please!"  
User currently offlineJohnnie From Portugal, joined Jul 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 10 months 5 hours ago) and read 1237 times:

I'm just wondering, Swissair maintained adamantly throughout it's history (recent years) that it would maintain independence and NOT join an Airline Global Alliance team. My question is, would SR have stood a better chance of surviving HAD it belonged to either Star Alliance or Oneworld?. Or did it's over-expansion program negate it's chance of good "health" even if it were an Alliance member?

Does anyone know if Crossair has plans to join an Alliance, once it has restructured for Global flying?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 2 hours ago) and read 1134 times:

well, Swissair had its own alliance, the Qualiflyer Alliance.
SR invested in some good airlines, but also in some airlines which were not profitable, thus decreasing its value.
well, SR and its affiliates of which the most were in poor shape financially together couldn´t keep up with the other alliances.
if SR would have gone the "joining a major alliance" road right from start and would have not invested so extensively into other airlines, i´m pretty sure that Swissair would still exist as we were used to know it.

afaik, there´s already a topic on this board about Crossair and a possible entry into an alliance in the future.

rgds
daniel



If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1863 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1086 times:

SR was also one of the three airlines that formed the first global alliance without a tacky name.  Wink/being sarcastic The alliance involved cross-equity ownership of SR, DL, and SQ. One could argue SR had the vision long before other airlines realized the potential of a strong global alliance. But SR couldn't capitalize on their vision. IMHO, SR's fall was mostly due to bad investments rather than not being a part of a major global alliance. OTOH, the basis of SR's investment strategy was valid. Investing in EU airlines was probably essential for SR's survival because of Switzerland's non-EU status. They just didn't have the right airlines to invest in.

User currently offlineGibberish From Switzerland, joined Sep 2000, 424 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1042 times:

Yes, Crossair will have to join an alliance, its investors say that only if they join a global alliance they will get money. Potential Oneworld member, in my eyes.

gibberish
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Swissair


User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1027 times:


Hi Cannuck friend!

Good topic you got, it's quite a challenging to all of us that love air transportation to talk about Swissair and see how these guys just "glidded" down. I think SR didn't want to go to one of those big alliances, this because SR had the same level or even higher than some of them, how could SR survive with a LH or a BA or a KL or a AZ? As soon as the bigger ones started to move SR did what some of us in the beggining expected a good move, create their own alliance - The Qualifyer - but the bad move was that they where surrounded by not real interesting airlines, SABENA? TAP? THY? AOM? all of them where european, no US airline, asian airline either? How could they go further? They invested all their profits buying shares of all those airlines and soon they where swollowed too, SR I think lost the train in mid 90's, I think if they stayed with DELTA and then try to get another good asian airline, let's say Singapore, THAI and then some smaller airlines the things could have been different, now we just pray that SR will start slowly from the scrath and will built a nice and again powerfull network, don't forget that SR in mid-50's also "glidded" down!!!
I don't want to stop seeing that famous red tail with white cross in our skies, it's like seeing the dark tail with the maple leaf, that's the image of those countries!!!
regards


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Swissair + Sabena - No Gossip, Please posted Mon Mar 27 2000 01:05:13 by IFLYDELTAJETS
YX "no Fanfare" SEA Inaugural Flight posted Mon Apr 2 2007 04:38:57 by Carfield
Pakistan Intl Starts "no-weight No-wait" Service posted Mon Feb 26 2007 07:51:06 by Jimyvr
Why "No Smoking" Still So Prominent In Airlines? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 22:20:33 by Birdwatching
Airbus: "No Plans" To Drop A380 Freighter posted Fri Nov 17 2006 11:02:24 by PanAm_DC10
No More "beverage Only" In FC On Northwest posted Wed Sep 6 2006 22:59:02 by Burnsie28
Airlines To Replace "No Smoking" With "No Mobile" posted Tue Aug 8 2006 10:45:46 by NWDC10
Southwest To U.S.P.S. "Sorry No More" posted Mon Jun 12 2006 19:38:13 by Jeffinbwi
"No Naked......" What? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 22:43:26 by AC_B777
ASA Is No Longer "Candler" And Now "Acey"? posted Wed Mar 15 2006 13:47:07 by DocChaos