Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AC 744s Combi: Specific Requirements?  
User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 26
Posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 939 times:

Hello,

Has anyone ever heard of specific safety requirements imposed in the early 1990s by the Canadian governments to Air Canada for its 747-400s Combi please?

Are these aircraft still Combis or have been converted to full-pax?

On what routes do they use them please?



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Jason Taperell



Thank you,

Best regards,
Alain Mengus

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 893 times:

I don't know about safety and I'm not sure about routes (maybe YYZ-FRA, YYZ-LHR??), but I know that they are still combis (or at least they were last year.) They may not be around much longer though. I forget the ownership details but Yyz717 will know.

J'éspère que je t'ai aidé un p'tit peu...



Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlineAC_A340 From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 2251 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 867 times:

All the original AC combis are still combis. I think they might have parked one, but I'm not sure. The ones they got from CP are full passenger. Most of the time the combis are used on trans-atlantic routes. Occasionally they would be used trans-pacific or even to tourist hot spots in the busy season.

User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1138 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 861 times:

When AC ordered their 744s in the early 90s, Transport Canada imposed a restriction: in the event of a massive troup movement operation, AC would be required to use their 744s to supplement DND's transports. Beacause of this, extra 'beefing up' of the landing gear and associated structures was required. Obviously, this added extra weight; in fact, this added weight severley restricted certain loads on longer flights. When AC parked their 744s in the desert upon delivery and desperately tried to sell them, there found there were no interested parties because on many flights, the extra weight made in uneconomical. AC reluctantly brought them into service, but have always had that weight restriction.

It sounds farfetched, but I assure you, I've heard this from many reliable sources. I may have some facts wrong, mind you.

I am unsure if ex CP machines have this mandated extra feature...



buhh bye
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16248 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 846 times:

According to JP Airline fleets, the AC 744 Combi's have the same max weight as the 4 ex-CP 744s. So the 3 AC Combis were not certified at a higher gross weight so perhaps the heavier weight of the mods simply means a reduced payload.

Of the 3 combis, 2 are leased from GE Capital. The 3rd appears to be owned. Of the 4 ex-CP 744's, one is in temp storage ("Max Ward") and will be returned to the lessor in Feb 02.

The 3 Combis are used on the following routes: YYZ-LHR/FRA/YVR and YVR-HKG.


Neil




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1138 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 834 times:

Yyz717 is right. I don't believe the gear mods increased the MTOW, they simply reduced the payload.

Back in the day, the 744 was also used on YVR-SEL & return. It seems they now use the 76 to the new ICN.



buhh bye
User currently offlineBoeing747-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 806 times:

I thought that C-FGHZ was the one is storage and it was going back? I hope not this is the new one and it should be the last to go.

User currently offlineBoeing747-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 765 times:

I have noticed that Air Canada has taken one 747-400 off line on there web site and now it says that they operate three where as they use to have four.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Update On The Ex AC 744s? posted Thu Aug 4 2005 02:09:15 by Cgagn
Configuration Of UA 777-200 ER And AC 744M (Combi) posted Sun Jun 5 2005 18:32:54 by Mrniji
Any Pics Of Former AC 744s? posted Sun Jan 9 2005 01:29:33 by AC7E7
AC Hit By US "no-fly" List Requirements posted Thu Apr 14 2005 17:43:05 by Arrow
When AC Retires Their 744s... posted Wed Oct 27 2004 05:12:12 by Dakotasport
AC To Hold On To 744s? posted Sat Feb 7 2004 19:56:18 by Bmacleod
KLM 744s All Passenger Or Combi? posted Thu Dec 25 2003 17:40:28 by Airplanetire
Airlines That Use Combi Configured AC? posted Wed Sep 10 2003 21:41:19 by Jblake1
Any Airlines With Converted Combi 744s? posted Sun Sep 22 2002 05:20:03 by LanPeru
Will AC Replace 747 Combi? posted Wed May 15 2002 20:05:38 by Avt007