Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
737-800s-NOT All That  
User currently offlineDeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2105 times:

I just recently, for the first time, flew with American on one of their 737-800s and I really can't say I was impressed.

Performance wise the a/c I'm sure is great. But, interior wise it sucks compared to an Airbus. First, the overhead bins are identical to the ones on Airbus. Second, if you are sitting on the window seat, with an Airbus the light that is attached to the overhead actually shines over the middle seat because the wall curves over that far when intercepting the overhead. Make sense? I see Boeing is still using the exact dimensiuons as the first 737 that came out over 30 years ago. And finally, the overhead ceilings look the same as the 737-200/100s.

Why does AA install TV monitors instead of popdowns? At least w/ popdowns you can use the 738 on short trips and never have them come down vs. having blank monitors.



30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1915 times:

First, the overhead bins are identical to the ones on Airbus.

Why is this a bad thing if you say that it "sucks compared to an Airbus"?



Second, if you are sitting on the window seat, with an Airbus the light that is attached to the overhead actually shines over the middle seat because the wall curves over that far when intercepting the overhead. Make sense?

No it doesn't make sense. I would hope that the light would shine on the seat it is intended for. You make it sound as if the Airbus lights are misaligned.



I see Boeing is still using the exact dimensiuons as the first 737 that came out over 30 years ago.

Well, it is after all a 737...... You don't explain why this is a bad thing.



And finally, the overhead ceilings look the same as the 737-200/100s.

Again you don't explain why this is a bad thing.


One of these days I'll have to catch a flight on an Airbus narrowbody to see if I think there is a difference.

mls515


User currently offlineDeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1863 times:

IMO I think the similarities between the 737-200 and the NG is that the NG is the latest improvement in design. So why would they have an interior that looks 30 years old, albeit the overhead bins? Everything else about the 737NGs are designed for the future. And, sitting behind the wings of these things after having many flights on the 737 classics, this is obvious. You can definetly feel these things flying faster, higher and quieter than their "classic" predessors. So the interior, why so old looking?

Anyone who has flown the Airbus 319/320 and sat on the window should know what I mean.


User currently offlineDeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

Bove: You are right, I'm probably the only one in the world that has noticed, but hey, we are all airline freaks on this forum and we all have to admit, when it comes to fetishes and planes, we all have them! Mine are the interiors!  Smile

User currently offlineCritter592 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

Ok, This dude says that the ceiling is the same on the 100/200, and the 800/900

Hmm, Can we confirm this???

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Jarek Dabrowski

This is the 737-900. Looks very...NEW

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © James Richard Covington, Jr

This is the 737-500. Looks very...Different


User currently offlineHooverair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1791 times:

I would rather fly on a 737 NG then on an airbus anyday

User currently offlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 2838 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1781 times:

Hmmm, yet another Bus v Boeing thread.

When I'm travelling down the back, I must admit that I prefer the 'bus.
I'm not what you'd call large, but I do find the seating in the 737 to be rather tight, especially the seat width.
With the new style bins on the 737/8/9, their larger size does seem to encroach considerably more on the cabin, which reduces the perceived spaciousness whilst also increasing the feeling that you're sat in a narrow tube.
The busses, on the other hand, are physically larger, and it does show. Even in a high density config., I find it easier to get comfortable......try eating a meal on a 737/8/9 without rubbing arms and shoulders with the person next to you !
And am I the only person who gets neck ache from looking through a 737's window ?
These qualities have obviously not been ignored by the majors; consider how many were once big time 727 or 737 operators but who are now big on busses:
British Airways
BMI British Midland
Sabena RIP
Air France
United
Mexicana
Lufthansa
NWA
to name just a few.
The Boeing is a superb example of technical evolution. Personally, however, I think Boeing should have bitten the bullet and gone for a clean sheet when deciding to replace the 300/400/500s. The A320 was too early in its life at the time for a major change, so Boeing could have stolen a lead and designed a true market leader, just as the 100/200s were at their inception.
As things stand, passenger preference for the bus and the economics of a complete range of aircraft with total commonality might prove to be too irresistable for other airlines to ignore.

Shamu



So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlineCritter592 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

I would fly on jetBlue's A320 over any 737. I love their appealing planes.

User currently offlineWarriorII From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

"With the new style bins on the 737/8/9, their larger size does seem to encroach considerably more on the cabin, which reduces the perceived spaciousness whilst also increasing the feeling that you're sat in a narrow tube.
The busses, on the other hand, are physically larger, and it does show. Even in a high density config., I find it easier to get comfortable......try eating a meal on a 737/8/9 without rubbing arms and shoulders with the person next to you !
And am I the only person who gets neck ache from looking through a 737's window ?


Ever try sitting in a window seat in any Airbus for that matter? You kinda' get the feeling the wall is creeping up on you, taking away arm space. And it's the same thing on the A320, the passanger cabin is pushed upwards to make way for the cargo hold, therefore "lowering" the window, and taking away from arm space.

-Tom


User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1646 times:

The only difference in space between the bus and the 737 is those extra 7 inches of cabin width. Thats an extra INCH per person. One Inch. Now you can't tell me that one inch makes a difference. I flew a CO 73G and a UA A319 within several months of eachother. The only difference in both flights (besides the stuff that varies from airline to airline) was that the A319 was slighly quieter on takeoff. Both were equally quiet during cruise and landing. Both also climbed very quickly.

User currently offlineThe747Man From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1647 times:

I am sick of all this crap about the width of the Airbus and Boeing. The A320 is BARELY wider, so you cannot tell a difference in cabin width!

I prefer the 73-7 and 738 over the A320.


User currently offlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 2838 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1575 times:


Call it what you like, but all the crap about cabin width does make a difference.

BA did a customer survey in which passengers were asked what the liked or disliked about the aircraft they were travelling in. In the "comments" section, more than 80% of the respondents travelling on the 319/320 specifically mentioned space as being greater in the A320 compared to the 737.

BMI carried out a very similar passenger census amongst its frequent fliers, and, surprise surprise, the most common comment was that there was more room on the bus, and the 2 most common keywords used were "spacious" and "comfortable."

Of course, a few thousand customers could be totally wrong, but in an era when competition and revenue drives everything, which airline CEO would be dumb enough to ignore such comments when replacing or upgrading his/her fleet ?

Regards

Shamu



So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1566 times:

1" per person does not sound like much, but relative to the amount of space available per person it suddenly becomes more.
The seatwidth on a 737 is say 20" (maybe a bit more) not counting the armrest. 1" is 5% extra space, which can make the difference between having to squeeze in and to sit down.

I haven't flown a lot of busses, and that quite some time ago (this being Boeing country) so I can't speak from personal experience, but 737s do have narrow seats (especially in economy, business is nice  Smile ).



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineVS744 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 677 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

IMO:
Having flown on dozens of 737's (200,300,400,500,800) and 757's(200) they are definately more "cramped" than the Airbus narrowbodies.
Nothing beats the 757 in terms of its grace and looks, but in terms of interior comfort, the boeings lose.
It may only be 7" wider, but it makes a difference!
I have got the Airbus A320 range specification for Airlines at home, and it is very heavily compared to the 737 and 757 aircraft throughout. The cross sections of the airbus and 757 are placed alongside each other, and even pictorally the airbus looks considerably bigger, although it isnt that much bigger!



User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 14, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

I disagree. I like the 737-800. It's crisp, modern, and a nice ride. I was skeptical about it, going to San Francisco from Newark in January last year on Continental and it was a great flight. Smooth ride and although our flight was delayed one hour on departure owing to an approaching mega-snow storm, we arrived in SFO 35 minutes ahead of schedule.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineNG737PSR From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1522 times:

I'm sorry but nobody, never, never, never, ever is going to tell me that the Airbus A319/320 is better than the NG737.

Try doing London Gatwick-Banjul (6hrs) 2,700 miles in a fully laden A320 - the things sometimes struggle to do Corfu-UK (3-4hrs).

The NG737s definately whoop the ass off any Airbus, the B737-600/700/800/900s are altogether superior products.

And at least a Boeing does what it is told to do by it's pilots and not it's computers.

By the way, isn't she gorgeous  Big thumbs up


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Christoph Lachmund-Sturm




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Chris Sheldon




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Chris Sheldon





User currently offlineAA767400 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2332 posts, RR: 26
Reply 16, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1487 times:

I like both the 737NG and A320 family. but I do work
the 738 all the time, and I have been on the A320 many times. I can tell you deltaflyertoo, that the 738 does not have the same overhead bins as the A320. The
A320's are larger. That is why I prefer that 320's overhead bin space. but I love them both! Big grin

blueskies!
Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Michael F. Mclaughlin






retroskies
Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ben Wang









"The low fares airline."
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 993 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1465 times:

One extra inch doesn't make a difference???

With the economy seats already being so tight, and myself being 6+ feet tall, I'll tell you than any inch makes a HUGE difference.

And why do you think people obsess so much about seat pitch on this forum? Because every inch matters. It doesn't matter which direction.


User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6751 posts, RR: 76
Reply 18, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1462 times:

As someone who likes to nodd off on a window seat... I find the circular cross section of the A320 family less comfortable to lean on than the 737s' more oval cross section. I'd fly on any of the 2 (except a Lufthansa A321)...  Smile

Looking at the pics, I don't see much difference between the classics and the NGs except for the optical illusion of the new design giving the perception of more space... (WTF? So where's the real space?)

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6374 posts, RR: 54
Reply 19, posted (12 years 8 months 4 days ago) and read 1441 times:

Why do we always discuss exact measures in emotional terms?

The 320 cabin is 7 inches wider than the 737. In 3x3 configuration there are four places where shoulder/elbows meet. With the same aisle width, if the shoulder/elbow separation is 2 inches on the 737, then it is 2 plus 7/4 = 3.75 inches on the 320. That's quite simple math.

On my emotional scale: With 3x3 config. the 320 is tight, the 737 is cramped.

Some airlines have figured it, and at least in business class configured their 737s 2x3. That of course beats everything.

But what does it matter? Both planes are made for flights lasting no more than a few hours. The tighter shoulder separation is more disturbing on a transatlatic flight on a 3x3 configured 757 which shares the 737 (727, 707) cabin width.

And after all legroom is a far more important comfort parameter. And totally airline decision dependant.

My only long flight on a Boeing 3x3 configured narrow body plane was on a 707 fifteen years ago. We were 11 pax on board. I put up the armrests and slept on 3 seats, quite comfu...  Big thumbs up

Regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3458 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1397 times:

First of all, the original post makes no sense. The writer says the Airbus is better, and then sites the Boeing's overhead bins that are like the Airbus' overhead bins as a Boeing "drawback".

Huh?

As far as seat width goes, I believe each airline puts in seats to its specifications. For instance, on United, their seat width is 18" on their A320s. On Northwest, it is 17.17". (Both figures come directly from those airline's websites.)

The Boeing 737-800 looks like it has uniform 17" seat width (at least on the DL and AA planes).

If you think passengers notice the .17" difference in width between a NW A320 and an AA 738, you are crazy. And frankly, what I would notice as a passenger (and have noticed), is the difference in seat pitch: 31-32" on a NW A320 vs. 33-36" on an AA 738.

I'm not going to get into an A vs. B war, just pointing out that anyone who says one plane has substantial advantages over the other (ESPECIALLY when it comes to airline-specific measurements of seat pitch and width) is wrong.


User currently offlineIAHERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 677 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

I don't know if this has been said, but the overheads and interior of the 737-800's vary from airline to airline. Continental has the large overheads that can accomodate roll-ons straight in allowing about 4-5 across. Continental also is installing an extra lav in the center of the aircraft like the -900. Continental also has the pop down screens and psu lights that can be moved around for your reading pleasure. Don't knock the aircraft, as it is only as comfortable as the airline chooses it to be.


Actually flown: EMB-120 EMB-145 B717 B737 B757 B767
User currently offlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 2838 posts, RR: 26
Reply 22, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

NG737PSR

Errrrm, the 'Busses were never designed for 6 hour legs in charter config. I also question your comment that the 320 struggles to get to CFU. For the last 3 years we've regularly done MAN or EMA - LCA, PFO, RHO with the 321 and I can't ever remember "struggling" to make destination.

Maybe your 738s have nicer coffee pots, but ask the passengers what they think of 6 hours in the highest density 738s in the world with only 30" pitch (or is it 29" ?). Leather seats and linen head rests hardly make the experience more pleasant. As someone else commented, each aircraft is only as pleasant as the airlines want them to be.

I never said that the 737NGs were a bad product; infact, to avoid the usual Airbus v Boeing slanging match, I said they were an excellent example of technical evolution, and I stand by that.

However, technical evolution of a design is a finite thing; if it wasn't, we'd all be flying around in supersonic Dakotas now.




So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlineVS744 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 677 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1275 times:

I thought this topic was to discuss the "comfort" of the Airbus compared to the 737 and not the performance of the two?



User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3458 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1243 times:

And now we are comparing the comfort of a 737NG in a charter layout to that of an A320 in standard configuration?

Give me a break.

Again: seat dimensions, seat pitch, overhead bin size, leather vs. cloth, etc. are ALL at an airline's discretion. I suppose the 737-800 is more comfortable than all A320s because AA has MRTC?


25 VS744 : All airbus narrows I have been on have been more comfortable than the endless amount of boeing narrows I have been on. But i still like the 757 more t
26 Meechy36 : I fly for AA and I'll take 3 more inches of legroom over an inch wider seat anytime. I work the 737 all the time and passengers seem to like it, the o
27 Thumper : Its obvious by every post you respond too and where you are from that you are so bias against Boeing that they could build the greatest plane in the w
28 AA737-823 : call me a pacifist, BUT. I just flew both an A319 from dallas to philly, and a 733 back. They're both fine. In USAir's config, the 319 is much more co
29 RoyalDutch : Ive been on a TAM A320 and a KLM 737-800...i actually prefered the 737, although both were very nice. TAM was operating the 320 on a MIA-MAO flight...
30 Donder10 : ''I would prefer a 767 or 777 over any Airbus. ''-and you appear of neutral opinion.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Not All That Bad: Museums posted Thu Mar 29 2001 17:56:56 by Caravelle
Are Not All Cockpit Controls Duplicated? posted Tue Oct 10 2006 10:31:22 by NEMA
AQ Getting 737-800s posted Sat Oct 7 2006 13:34:30 by Lahaina
Air Sahara To Buy 10 737-800s posted Mon Aug 28 2006 10:09:03 by PanAm_DC10
Winglets On CO's 737-800s posted Wed Jul 19 2006 06:02:24 by Simairlinenet
Qantas To Order 5 737-800s And 2 A320s? posted Mon Mar 27 2006 17:48:34 by ClassicLover
WSJ: CIT To Acquire 10 Undelivered Delta 737-800s posted Tue Dec 6 2005 15:30:50 by N328KF
Not All Planes Of The Same Type Equal? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 13:03:45 by Jorge1812
Do WestJet 737-800s Have PTV's? posted Sun Aug 21 2005 06:47:56 by DekX
Kenya Airways Orders New 737-800s! posted Fri Aug 12 2005 21:49:34 by NYC777