Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why The Military Jets Over Nyc?  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2338 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Since 9/11, we've got military jets flying overhead.
Beleive me, I don't know the details.
Why?????

Please tell me it's for the percieved threat that we'd fire upon an airliner in the vicinity. Otherwise, I think they are useless waste of our tax payer dollars!

I love jets, but I really don't see what an F-15 or 16 would do? God forbid we had another terrorsit threat in NYC what would they do? Circle and watch? Shoot down the city?
I apologize if I am being too practical. But as much as I love our jets, I don't see they utility.

I could see an EA-6B Prowler or Viking S-3 or AWACS in the area doing some sort of James Bondish recon and surveillance over NYC, listening in on everything going down in the city. But hey, who am I kidding??





Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3674 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2315 times:

AWACS are in the area as well. AWACS are covering the entire US right now, a couple US and five NATO planes. I personally saw an AWACS yesterday after the crash - I had heard the airspace was closed and saw a real-time map showing no planes in the area, so I was wondering what the heck that large, high-flying plane was outside my window. Looked closer and saw the faint hint of its radar appendage. It looked to be somewhere around 15,000 feet.

As for the fighters, yes, they're here to shoot down another hijacked plane. I'm sure you're well aware that there are continuing terrorist threats against the US, and while the sound of the F-15's flying above does drive me nuts, I feel reassured that they're up there.

I don't think it's costing a hell of a lot of money to keep them up there. They were on standby ready to scramble before 9/11 anyway; the only added cost to flying them instead is fuel and maybe some extra maintenance. A small price to pay for even the little bit of extra safety they bring. If they'd been up there on 9/11, we'd probably still have a couple buildings standing right now that aren't.



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 44
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2302 times:

Hmm... maybe for SECURITY??? Maybe because there's 25 million people there? Maybe because there's rush hour 24 hours a day, seven days a week, over numerous bridges and through numerous tunnels? Maybe because there's a nuke plant only 45 miles up the river?

Hmm....

redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2299 times:

Huh? A waste of money?

Two air to air missiles fired by a NYC combat air patrol on 9/11 would have:

-Mentally ruined the pilots who had to shoot them.
-Destroyed two civillian passenger jets.
-Kept the day's tragedy in numbers in low hundreds instead of the thousands.

Forgive me if I'm drawing conclusions, but you seem to think the events in New York on that Tuesday morning couldn't possibly happen again. That's naive.

As far as the cost, keep in mind that this country had one if not more specially modified 707 jetliners airborne constantly for 35 years or so (the "Looking Glass" nuclear command and control aircraft) in the name of national defense. So we've footed such bills before.


User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2271 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Naive, not really. Realistic? Definitely.

Spacecadet, I appreciate your views and comments. Like I mentioned, I was not sure what was up there.

Redngold, ask yourself: Is it even necessary that I type this? note: It's a right to free speech, not an obligation.
PS- I live in and have breathed NYC my whole live. I know why they are there.

Heavymetal- Perhaps yours was a foregone conclusion as stated. I agree on your points however, perhaps there are better ways to use our military resources.





Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineHSV From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2261 times:

They fighter jets may seem like they are useless but think about this... would you break the speed limit if there are a cop following you. You probably wouldn't so is it a waste of tax payers money to employ that cop?

User currently offlineBaec777 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1231 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2253 times:

Military Jets have rights to fly over airspace anytime, anywhere. They are there to look out for suspicious of terrors if any happeneing or planned.

Baec777  Sad


User currently offlineTbird From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 851 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2249 times:

Greetings:

Military jets are always flying somewhere over the U.S on training missions and during the Cold War as stated by Heavymetal protecting the U.S from the Soviets. This time their protecting us from Terroists. You do have valid point, but I much rather have my tax dollars spent on F16's patrolling the skies then on some pork barrel BS spending.

Thanx
Tom


User currently offlineZebfly2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 417 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2247 times:

Hey Mrrodie, when I flew to ISP from BWI 2 weeks after 9-11 I saw 2 fighter jets flying in formation and was somewhat apprehensive. That whole weekend I was in NY, I could hear them during the day and see their lights at night. On my return flt from ISP I saw one flying parrallel to our flight but as we left the NYC area he turned and appeared to be going back to NY. I can also see the fighters when flying over Baltimore and the DC area at night. One has to wonder what would the pilot be thinking if he/she was given the green light to shoot down a passenger jet if ordered to do so. Is it possible for the fighters to shoot to disable the jet so it would have half a chance to land safely?


Educate your children before others mis-educate them!!!
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2225 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I noticed some funky fighter flying on my ISP-BWI RT too. I think I have gotten used to it. Do I feel safer? Not really.

As far as shooting the plane to disable it, I would think its a possibility.

Points understood. But I'm sorry, you seem to forget I'm near all this garbage. So you aren't really saying anything new guys.

Consider this: Barring any another airliners intentionally flying into any buildings, what will a fighter do?

Bridges, tunnels, powerplants, water supplies....with so many targets, what is fighter to do?

Sorry for being a cynic but I feel about as safe with them up in the air as I do when I see our unarmed Nat'l Guard troops in the city.

Security is a good thing when its thought out. Send up a Prowler with recon and a few missiles

I welcome your comments. Really, I do. But all I ask for is a valid arguement, not facts I know already.

Spacecadet, Heavymetal, Tbird and Zebfly2...all well conceived points.



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Delta - Why The MD-88 Over The 737-400? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 22:25:39 by 1337Delta764
Military Jets Over Cleveland posted Wed Jul 9 2003 23:10:56 by Dan2002
Military Jets Over Cleveland? posted Fri Apr 11 2003 01:36:23 by Dan2002
Thermal, CA - Why All The Biz Jets? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 09:10:29 by Clickhappy
Why The Demise Of The Long-haul Tri-jets? posted Sat May 8 2004 18:38:34 by Saab2000
Late Night Jets Over The Hudson River posted Fri Dec 12 2003 00:43:57 by RiverVisualNYC
Why The "H" In Southwest Jets posted Wed Jan 31 2001 04:56:58 by ContinentalEWR
LHR:Their Landing On 27L Again, But Why The Break? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 12:17:23 by Lazyshaun
Why Do News Channels Over-react?! posted Sat Nov 11 2006 17:24:05 by A320ajm
767 With RR Engines - Why The Lack Of Orders? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 00:06:13 by 1337Delta764