Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa And The Nazis  
User currently offlineUal1636 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3663 times:

I was watching a show on Speedvision and they were talking about Lufthansa's fleet in the 30s. They showed some of their planes while flying and there was a swastica(Nazi symbol) on the tail? Did the Nazi party own Lufthansa while they were in power?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpaceman Spiff From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

The Nazis eventually had control of every company in Germany whether that company liked it or not. They took control for national defense reasons. Anybody who said no got a lovely vacation in one of the lovely little camps. The U.S. airlines of the day were pressed into service in the Air Transport Command. So yes, Lufthansa, Diamler, Junkers, etc. did what they were told, which doesn't mean that the people in that company agreed with it. Much like the way Singer Sewing Machines built guns for the U.S. durning the war. It is more interesting to note that American Airlines used to code share with the Nazi Zeppelin, Hindenburg. That was in 1936 and 1937.

User currently offlineCricri From France, joined Oct 1999, 581 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

But I never heard about the nazi symbol on the airplane's tails. I hope this was not the case.

User currently offlineGagarin From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3474 times:

Take a look at Zeppelin Hinderberg photoes and promotion posters. Also, find some books in library on neoclassicism in 20 century art history.

You'll see that official art was integral part of German society, much like socialist realism was in Russian/Soviet one. It doesn't have anything to do with the airline's decesion but rather totalitarian regime paradigm.


User currently offlineSpaceman Spiff From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3461 times:

If current U.S. aviation law required a U.S. Flag on the tail of every aircraft operated for hire here, then that is exactly what you would see here. Same for Germany in the 1930s.

User currently offlineSp-deluxe From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3456 times:

1)This is an aviation forum not modern history
2) Nazi germany was not a totalitarian society, read one of the revisionist historians on the subject, and get your facts straight


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa And The Boeing 767. posted Fri Apr 7 2006 11:53:23 by Gilesdavies
Lufthansa And The Football Nose posted Wed Nov 16 2005 16:38:00 by Numbertwelve
Lufthansa And The 717 posted Sat May 28 2005 19:36:09 by KCMike
Lufthansa And The 7E7? posted Tue May 4 2004 12:39:07 by Caetravlr
Lufthansa And The 757-300 posted Wed Apr 4 2001 15:01:48 by GodBless
Lufthansa And The TU-204 posted Wed Apr 19 2000 01:03:35 by JAT
Lufthansa And The Nazis posted Mon Dec 13 1999 03:23:31 by Ual1636
In The Past: Lufthansa And MSP posted Tue Jun 11 2002 05:48:38 by Continental
Extra Capacity And The A380 -no Advantage Imho posted Sat Nov 25 2006 12:30:08 by Eugdog
BA And 'the Cross'........ posted Fri Nov 24 2006 18:00:38 by BAStew