Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Turboprops In Turbulence  
User currently offlineGrowly150 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 158 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

What turboprops do u think handle turbulence the best? the worst?
The Dash 8 and Saab 340 seem to handle it poorly, while the Jetstream 41 is very smooth, in my opinion.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGrowly150 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

apparently i'm the only one who's flown on turbos

User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6751 posts, RR: 76
Reply 2, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

The only turbos I've been on are Electras and F27s... I'd say the F27 gets flipped about while the electras just plough through turbulence (unless it just falls out of the sky)

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1813 times:

I think turboprops are the worst in turbulence because of them being lightweight. In August of this year I flew on a US Airways Express DH8 from ALB to BWI where we hit some turbulence and were being knocked around quite a bit through most of the landing descent into BWI.

User currently offlineIAHERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 677 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1784 times:

Actually it is because of the weight and the wing. TP's have for the most part straight wings. Great for climbing but not too efficient in cruise. The wings are very strong but don't take chop too well. The EMB-120 gets tossed around a good bit. I've actually been in turbulance a few years ago in a Brasilia where the escape rope in the cockpit came out of the ceiling and the FO's flight case(sits to the right of the fo) came over into my lap. 3 service units came out of the ceiling in the back and the lavatory sloshed all around the back of the airplane. Auto-pilot kicked off and the #2 engine oil quantity voice "oil" was being heard and all this on a clear day.



Actually flown: EMB-120 EMB-145 B717 B737 B757 B767
User currently offlinePSU_DTW_SCE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1757 times:

I think it is very tough to say which turboprop handles turbulence the best since there is no way to accurately measure this. You can't really compare this since turbulence varies so much and there is no telling how much there actually is and how strong it is and how much you will feel it. In your case you may have just flown on a J41 on a day with little chop in the air whereas when you flew the Saab 340 or Dash 8 on a day when the air was very turbulent.

I've never flown on a J41 but I've flown on both the Dash-8 & Saab 340, & ATR-42 many, many times. In each case, I've had flights that have been perfectly smooth and others where I've been bounced all over the place. Ususally cruise is smooth, but climb & descent are all over the place. Even so, my roughest flight ever was on an AA 727-200 from RDU-DTW where we spend the entire flight circling t-storms and crossing a huge frontal boundary. There is no exact way to say which is the best or worst aircraft from a passenger experience. However, the general rule is that jets get bounced around less than props. As for RJ's I dunno, since I've never been on one, but I believe weight is a factor in how much a plane gets bounced around.


User currently offlineStarship From South Africa, joined Nov 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1748 times:

The Beech Starship, being canard equipped rides chop extremely well. The design makes it inherently very stable, which is no doubt why Omni 1 is used as a photo survey plane.






Behind every "no" is a "yes"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Westjet In Turbulence Incident posted Fri Sep 7 2007 12:47:48 by Lxlgu
Sensations MD-80 In Turbulence posted Wed Jan 31 2007 23:12:00 by DiscoverCSG
787 To Ride Better In Turbulence posted Thu Apr 14 2005 05:52:02 by Havaloc
Crew And Pax Injured In Turbulence posted Mon Oct 14 2002 15:11:01 by LMML 14/32
LOT 767 In Turbulence posted Mon Jul 9 2001 09:45:30 by Kuba74
Severe Turbulence In ANC On Monday posted Mon Dec 10 2007 23:12:52 by FlyingNanook
Turbulence In First & Business Class posted Mon Oct 8 2007 00:17:47 by Allrite
757 Wake Turbulence /In-N-Out Burger Crash (1993) posted Fri Aug 24 2007 17:35:02 by MSYtristar
Turbulence LAX-SYD In Feb posted Fri Jan 27 2006 15:27:07 by SuseJ772
A380 Wake Turbulence Data Are In posted Mon Nov 14 2005 22:09:11 by AeroPiggot
A380 Showers - What Happens In Turbulence? posted Thu Jan 5 2012 11:54:57 by TCASAlert
Westjet In Turbulence Incident posted Fri Sep 7 2007 12:47:48 by Lxlgu
Sensations MD-80 In Turbulence posted Wed Jan 31 2007 23:12:00 by DiscoverCSG
787 To Ride Better In Turbulence posted Thu Apr 14 2005 05:52:02 by Havaloc
Crew And Pax Injured In Turbulence posted Mon Oct 14 2002 15:11:01 by LMML 14/32
LOT 767 In Turbulence posted Mon Jul 9 2001 09:45:30 by Kuba74
Deaths/severe Injuries From In Flight Turbulence posted Sun Jan 8 2012 12:08:31 by ltbewr
AC In Sensationalized Turbulence Story posted Wed Jun 2 2010 05:56:45 by awschucksflyer
Landing With Turbulence In Orlando posted Sun Jan 17 2010 12:57:34 by Lando
Severe Turbulence In ANC On Monday posted Mon Dec 10 2007 23:12:52 by FlyingNanook