Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
717 Thrust Reversers  
User currently offlineBoeing 777-400 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 129 posts, RR: 1
Posted (16 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1224 times:

About the topic on 717 thrust reversers I posted a while ago, I meant the A330-340 engines were effficient in the way they were designed not the way they perform. They fold out from the engine, is what I meant by efficient.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thrust Reversers? posted Mon Jun 12 2006 01:50:46 by WNCrew
Airports That 'Ban' Thrust Reversers posted Sun Jun 6 2004 03:25:26 by Horus
Airbus And Boeing Thrust Reversers posted Wed Feb 25 2004 19:22:15 by Horus
Does Anyone Like The Sound Of Thrust Reversers? posted Sat Oct 25 2003 21:41:27 by Congun1
Post 9/11warnings About Thrust Reversers posted Thu Jun 6 2002 14:11:53 by 777kicksass
For Those Of You Who Like Thrust Reversers: posted Tue Mar 5 2002 11:27:24 by 747-600X
Thrust Reversers VS. Tow Tugs For Pushback posted Thu Dec 27 2001 06:48:11 by Rj777
Thrust Reversers Extended Before Completely Landed posted Fri Nov 2 2001 00:53:59 by N17085
A340 Thrust Reversers? posted Tue Jul 17 2001 02:00:59 by Pilotallen
Pushbacks Using Thrust Reversers posted Fri Jul 6 2001 20:44:09 by DIA