Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AC Low Cost Latest  
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1053 times:

Air Canada has announced that effective January 7, 2002, AC Tango will add new flight between St. John's to Halifax, Halifax to Montreal and Halifax to Ottawa.

Meanwhile, Air Canada has begin to recruitement for their newly established low-cost airline based in Calgary, called "Low Cost Co."

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAkash From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 990 times:

It's about time!

Next flight - YYZ-DEL Jul 29
User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 984 times:

about time for what? Air Canada to try some more predatory pricing, fighting brands, and loss-making? I think they already do plenty of that. Now maybe someone can explain something: If the competition bureau had decided that tango was illegal, why is it being allowed to expand, or even to continue operations???

Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlineCaptaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 978 times:

I think mainly it was seen as illegal because of Canada 3000, since Tango was directly targetting C3. Now that they are conveniently gone, it isn't illegal anymore! Isn't that wonderful. GRRRRR

"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 975 times:

I agree Jean Leloup that Air Canada has got to stop being the bully. The reason Tango is still flying Captaingomes said. The LCC will not save Air Canada, will not put them into profitability and will not put more passengers in the empty seats.

Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
User currently offlineYKA From Netherlands, joined Sep 2001, 766 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 954 times:

Does anyone know what routes AC Low Cost will serve? Is YKA a contender?

User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 951 times:

Since the admitted idea is to compete with westjet, YKA, I'm guessing that Kamloops is not in the running, which must be doubly frustrating for you. However, woudln't it be interesting if they did serve kamloops? (I mean seeing as how WJ says the airport isn't safe, and such.)

Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlinePlaneguy From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 334 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 945 times:

So far it seems that every time a carrier starts an airline-within-an-airline subsidiay it ends up being burned. BA couldn't make a go of "GO", UA shelved the Shuttle and USAir pulled the plug on Metrojet. Ok, so Delta's Express is still around but, correct me if I'm wrong, it has been scaled back. Only time will tell whether AC will go down the same path. My gut feeling is that they won't be able to pull it off.

User currently offlineYKA From Netherlands, joined Sep 2001, 766 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 937 times:

Yeah but to be sucesfull loco needs to serve places not served by WJ. What good will do if they start serving all the places that WJ already does? People will still fly WJ and loco will not suceed.

User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 932 times:

If Air Canada is stupid enough to take Westjet on directly than there is no way that they would realize that there are profitable routes Westjet doesn't serve. All of the LCC's routes will compete with Westjet, otherwise what's the point of competing with the mainline system.

Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
User currently offlineCrj-900 From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 920 times:

I’m sorry did I miss something? Tango was responsible for the demise of C3? I realize that AC often abuses its dominant position when, and only when, its found to cut rates below those necessary to generate profits. Tango was not in the skies for a full three days when C3 went under. How are they responsible? They only operate three aircraft at the moment. It’s not like the one-month notice before its launch was enough time to drag away any significant number of C3 pax.
I do have another question for the thrones of Air Canada haters. Do you not continuously complain about a lack of competition? AC’s monopoly of the domestic skies? Air Canada has no current product to offer low cost consumers, right? So then does this not mean that Westjet should have some competition? They currently offer the only low cost product in Canada.
I see no problem with Air Canada bringing some competition to the table. With that said, for this competition to be fare Air Canada must cover there overhead.

User currently offlineJean Leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 914 times:

It may not be reasonable to blame C3's demise on Tango, I agree. However, it is a FACT (not an opinion) that the competition commissioner had decided that Tango was illegal, and was aint-competitively aimed at AC. So, althought they were not responsible for the demise of C3; the finding was that they WOULD have contributed to the demise of C3 further down the road, had they not collapsed anyway. Competition is good and the idea of the new LCC being a wholly owned but separate subsidiary (i.e., able to have lower costs) is at least a legal idea because they can compete using realistic fares. But this was not the case with tango, in that they were clearly (in the opinion of the government) selling tickets at below cost to hurt C3. As you know, this makes it a fighting brand and was therefore ILLEGAL. So I disagree with you about Tango and think they should be put to an end so that someone in the East will at least POSSIBLY have a chance to make money, other than AC. The new carrier , though, is another matter. Though I don't expect to be a fan of it, I don't think there's anything unethical about it - yet, and if it's properly and fairly run, then we should welcome it.

Next flight.... who knows.
User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 897 times:

Crj-900 wrote: "I see no problem with Air Canada bringing some competition to the table."

But, as already mentioned in the other thread, what is the motivation for launching Zip?

It can't be in order to make a profit. Low-cost subsidiaries of mainline carriers have an abysmally poor success rate -- in fact, none of them have been a clear success. And setting up hubs in Hamilton and Calgary, instead of markets waiting to be developed like Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax, is going to spark a war of attrition from which only one discount carrier will walk away alive.

Competition for profit motives is a fine thing; competition by using a loss-leader to knock off or debilitate a corporate rival is quite another.

User currently offlineAllee From Canada, joined Jun 1999, 486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 881 times:

I don't see a problem with increased competition. I once was bitter with Air Canada (having growing up loving Canadian Airlines), but have moved on. If Air Canada wants to offer me an airline that has low fares, GREAT! I can fly Air Canada at the same fares as Westjet or C3, but still get the benefits of the Air Canada network (ie. Aeroplan, increased frequency). I am scheduled to fly Air Canada next week YVR-LAX return, and I paid $400 per person. I still think that's too much.

User currently offlineCrj 900 From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 594 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (13 years 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 875 times:

Hey guys the OTHER crj 900 here.....who knows what Robert is doing, i guess now that there is little competition he's decided we have free riegn on the skies. I do agree however that C3 sealed it's own fate with some of their decisions and don't blame AC for that. All's fair in love and war. Good thing is, now all the C3 people can apply for jobs at AC low cost and don't gimme any of that BS that you'd NEVER work for AC. If you luv the industry, luv to fly(especially), you'll do whatever you can to get back into it. It'll be interesting to see who they hire. Even laid off AC employees are not guaranteed jobs, just preferential interview status. Good luck to all.

User currently offlineAC_A340 From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 2251 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (13 years 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 868 times:

Crj-900, I could not agree more with you.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AC's Low-cost Airline To Be Based In YVR posted Wed Aug 15 2001 19:00:44 by Jiml1126
AC Considers International Low-cost posted Thu May 16 2002 01:37:13 by Jiml1126
BRU Considers Building Low Cost Terminal. posted Sat Feb 10 2007 16:02:11 by Manni
PIA Starts Low-cost Services posted Thu Jan 18 2007 16:22:10 by Debonair
Why So Few Long Haul Low Cost Carriers? posted Fri Jan 5 2007 13:42:42 by 777MAS
Low Cost Bosses To Form Budget Long Haul Airline? posted Mon Jan 1 2007 12:24:46 by Airpearl
Air France Low-cost Off-spring posted Fri Nov 17 2006 01:24:16 by Breiz
Low-cost Airlines At GLA...do They Use Airbridges? posted Wed Nov 15 2006 15:15:15 by 8herveg
Low Cost Carriers To Russia From The UK. posted Sun Nov 5 2006 15:29:52 by Gilesdavies
Low Cost Start-Up Skybus Orders 65 A319s posted Thu Oct 26 2006 07:08:21 by FlyCMH