Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ: Underbelly Cargo & Window Level  
User currently offlineSFOintern From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 770 posts, RR: 5
Posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

Wondering why new-build CRJ-200s aren't produced with the enhancements made to the CRJ-700/900... namely underbelly cargo and a 4-inch elevation of the cabin windows, as well as cabin redesigns.

CRJ-700...notice the underbelly cargo door in front of the wing, portside? Also, notice the elevated window level?

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Felix Sieder



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Derek Pedley



CRJ-200...absent on the smallies... "neckbreaking" windows

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ian Haskell



I know the obvious answer is that the -700 and -900 need more cargo space for the commensurate #of pax, but wouldn't underbelly cargo provide extra revenue potential for CRJ-200 operators?

  • SFO

  • 7 replies: All unread, jump to last
     
    User currently offlineDC-10inLB From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 140 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

    On the CRJ-200 there is a hatch underneath but it is an access to the "guts" of the plane, I don't think there is any room for cargo underneath in the -200. I think moving the windows up is a great improvement, but probably won't trickle down to the -200 since so many are already produced it'd be easier to keep the old and new -200s alike for common parts in fleets etc. those are just a few of my thoughts

    User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 3
    Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1351 times:


    As above, I don't think there is any physical room to have a belly locker on the -200. As it goes, the useabillity of the belly locker on the -700 is questionable.

    With such a low clearance, the locker is going to cause rumblings with operational health and safety issues (back strains, etc..). Also, because of the small height of the locker, it works best with the slide loading system (a bit like a draw that comes out, is loaded, and slided back into the belly). This makes the verticle height very small, and gives very little useable storage space.

    B727-200



    User currently offlinePHLFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 851 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1346 times:

    I have only been on a CRJ 3 or 4 times. After my first trip I learned to never request a window seat. The window is too low to see out of and you have no room for your right shoulder due to the curvature of the fuselage. I am only 6'1"!

    User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
    Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1327 times:

    well, Canadair is acutally considering a variant of the CRJ 100/200 which would include the aforementioned features introduced on the CRJ 700/900.
    the new variant, which is still not officially launched and has not yet received sufficient interest, is dubbed CRJ 500 (makes sense, doesn´t it?).

    Canadair approached Lufthansa CityLine, launching customer of the CRJ and major operator of all current three derivatives (-100, -200, -700), which is not interested in it because it doesn´t see a need for the CRJ 500 having.

    rgds
    daniel



    If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
    User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4150 posts, RR: 37
    Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1316 times:

    LHCL´s not-interest is easy to explain: they have just gotten their CRJ200s, most of them being less than two years old. And as far as I remember LHCL´s 728JET options are convertible into 528JET orders.

    Regards
    Flying-Tiger
    http://fly.to/rorders



    Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
    User currently offline242 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 498 posts, RR: 1
    Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1276 times:

    I guess you could use the belly of a -200 for cargo as long as all the useless* stuff that occupies that space is removed.


    *Attitude/Heading computers
    Autopilot computer
    ILS receivers
    NAV receivers
    COM tranceivers
    Transponder
    Wx Radar
    Fuel Qty Computer
    Flap Computer
    Crew Oxygen bottle
    etc.....


    Maybe a bit sarcastic, but the fact of the matter is that the area under the floor, forward of the wing box is jam packed full of stuff that makes everything on the flight deck work.

    I'm with you on the window placement. The designers should have seen this aircraft as more than a stretched rich man's toy.



    User currently offlineSFOintern From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 770 posts, RR: 5
    Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1256 times:

    Has that usless shite been relocated in the CRJ-700/900? Or--because of their respective lengths, is there just simply extra room for cargo?

  • SFO

  • Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    Florida West Cargo & Chile Cruise Day Trip Victims posted Sun Mar 26 2006 05:23:56 by LTBEWR
    Aloha Considers Sale Of Cargo & Services Units posted Tue Sep 28 2004 19:34:27 by HA_DC9
    SIA Cargo & Others Launch Cargo Internet Portal posted Tue Feb 4 2003 17:20:32 by Singapore_Air
    DC8 Cargo & 727 Cargo posted Sat Oct 12 2002 01:09:39 by Airlineguy
    British Airways Cargo & Atlas Air Questions posted Mon Jan 1 2001 21:06:15 by CX747
    RFD Cargo Up-JetBlue & Southwest Showing Interest posted Thu Jul 27 2006 21:12:27 by KarlB737
    Cathay Pacific Cargo Adds ARN & YYZ To Network posted Mon Jun 19 2006 19:25:22 by Hkg82
    Cargo Kings: 777F & 748F posted Mon May 15 2006 17:43:59 by Sangas
    CRJ & EMB Fuel Use posted Sat Apr 8 2006 15:45:14 by Curious
    Qatar Airways Cargo DC-10's & News posted Tue Dec 27 2005 22:43:12 by B742