Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TWA 717's  
User currently offlineMark2102 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 350 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Is AA going to take the TWA 717's or will they just get rid of them? If so, where will they go?

Mark

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1255 times:

I just found out this Saturday from a reliable source within TWA that AA's long-term plan is to get rid of the 717's and the F100's and replace them all with 737's (she didn't know what series 737 though). She said crews LOVE flying the 717 and of course it does have excellent fuel efficiency but there were a couple of problems: 1) The 737 has very similar fuel efficiencies but offers more seating, and 2) the Rolls Royce engines on the 717 don't allow for powerbacks, and AA wants its planes to have that ability (being able to push back from the gate without equipment). Another little flaw with the 717: she said there are circuit panels at floor level in the equipment storage area in the front of the cabin, and you can't spill any liquid on the floor as there could be a danger of shorting out the circuits if the liquid came in contact with the circuitry (she cited an incident with a 717 landing at DFW due to the 717 losing power). She didn't give a time-frame for AA's 737 plans, but said they were long-term. Given the current situation, I would say it would be awhile before AA goes forward with this. As for where they would go, one good guess would have to be AirTran. Midwest Express might be a candidate as well.


An unexamined life isn't worth living.
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1207 times:

They may as well get rid of them...Right now my heart is exposed, so it may as well just get ripped out.  Sad

User currently offlineIflewrepublic From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 537 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1189 times:

TWA717_200:

I hear ya, bud. Perhaps, they can join our (NWA's)family...we'd take good care of them for ya.

Iflewrepublic.



Aviation is proof that, given the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible.
User currently offlineBoiler Special From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 135 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1163 times:

I believe AA's current plan is to have the 717s back in Boeing's hands by 31 Dec 02. Sadly...

-Kevin


User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1147 times:

Iflewrepublic, do I have your word on that?  Smile

User currently offlineAmericanF100 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 243 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

Well, I heard from my good friend who is a pilot at American that the rumour going around is that Boeing is going to pay American for their F-100's and then AA will buy 717's. It's only a rumour but it could very well be true.

Matt~

P.S.- I really hope they don't get rid of
the F-100's, they are so much nicer than
the 717's.


User currently offlineMark2102 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 350 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

The 717 can hold moe people than the F-100 and it is a bit bigger. Most of all, they are newer. The Boeing 717 really never took off sales wise. I would like to see it survive.

Mark


User currently offlineJetBlue320 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1127 times:

TWA 717, IFLEWREPUBLIC... I Respect you guys.

User currently offlineJettblasterp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 203 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1113 times:

Very strong rumor is AA is giving them back to Boeing and YX will start taking delivery of those used planes around August at deeply discounted rates.

User currently offlineAloha 737-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1109 times:

YX???

User currently offlineJettblasterp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 203 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1099 times:

Sorry...YX = Midwest Express Airlines.

User currently offlineCannedSpam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1089 times:

Jettblasterp is correct... They are going to be history. AmericanF100's pilot friend has heard an untrue rumor I'm afraid.

User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1064 times:

<<2) the Rolls Royce engines on the 717 don't allow for powerbacks, >>


That must only be for AA's 717s...at AirTran..that's all we do unless they are going out of a few select gates. Powerbacks w/ the 717 is a normality out of ATL. From the way I understand it...most planes with engines on the wings can't do a powerback....can anyone confirm this??

Ry


User currently offlineIflewrepublic From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 537 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1067 times:

All right...I've figured it out...I have the cans of red spray paint, boxes of DC-9 safety cards, etc...all I need you to do is distract them. When the bossman asks, we can respond with "Hey...er...umm...that's a nice looking 'DC-9' there. Imagine what a 717 would look like."  Big grin

I honestly would love to see that plane in our fleet. I don't think I'm the only one around here. I think the future of that plane rests in our hands...we can be the ones to secure it's place.

Iflewrepublic.



Aviation is proof that, given the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible.
User currently offlineUsa4624 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 266 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1048 times:

Who owns TWA's 717s? Did TWA pay cash for them (I doubt it, given their financial situation), or are they owned by a leasing company (Boeing Leasing, GE, etc)?

User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3462 posts, RR: 47
Reply 16, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1022 times:

>I believe AA's current plan is to have the 717s back in Boeing's
>hands by 31 Dec 02. Sadly...

Nope. 2002 will see little change for the moment. The current plan (changes hourly in this new world we live in) has AA deferring most new deliveries and as earlier stated, AA wants to replace 717s with additional 737s.

>Well, I heard from my good friend who is a pilot at American that
>the rumour going around is that Boeing is going to pay American for
>their F-100's and then AA will buy 717's. It's only a rumour but it
>could very well be true.

Boeing made a strong pitch to AA on a one-for-one purchase of 717s for F100s (to include any/all USAir planes if that deal went thru). Ultimately the whole thing fell apart with AA's requirement that Boeing not sell/lease the used F100s to any North American operations --didn't want someone getting AA's airplanes cheaply and using them against AA.

>Who owns TWA's 717s?

All of TWA's new delivery aircraft were on pretty ugly lease terms (approximately double AA's lease payments for the same aircraft models).



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 996 times:

I didnt think the 737 could power back. I dont know, I have just never seen on do it.


I love the 717, can anyone talk NWA or DAL into making a big order , PLEASE.


User currently offlineWoodsboy From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1029 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 967 times:

I have only ever seen 727s, MD80s, F100s and DC-9s do powerbacks from gates. Yes, I have seen AirTran 717s powerback in ATL so I know its possible, why wouldn't it be?

Also, from what I see, the reason a 737 (or other aircraft with wing mounted engines) couldnt do a powerback may be a combination of two things. The type of thrust reverser on a 737 is different from the clamshell types on MD-80s etc, maybe it doesnt give the right kind of "push" and mostly, I think that the possibility of the engine sucking in FOD on a 737 is much breater since its SO close to the ground, everything stirred up from the thrust reverser is going to go right into the engine!

Delta- replace your 737-200s on the shuttle runs with 717s!! Also, how about some 717s for SkyWest, those damn little CRJs are so full out of Salt Lake City to points north that you have to sometimes wait all day for a seat to a market like Boise, Billings or Calgary- wait, sometimes I have to wait 2 days for a seat to Calgary!


User currently offlineN2111J From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 148 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 964 times:

The latest I read as of yesterday is that all AA 727's will be retired by next June, and all 717's retired by next November.

User currently offlineJetBlue320 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 964 times:

Uh...Whoever said BR715 cannot do powerbacks. Think Again


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Marc Sauthier

This Airtran 717 with BR715 engines seems to be doing fine while POWERBACKING


User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 34
Reply 21, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 950 times:

A little off topic, but I've seen and been on Eastern 757's at ATL that did powerbacks years ago.

Tom in NO (at MSY)



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineCannedSpam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (12 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 904 times:

> Nope. 2002 will see little change for the moment.
> The current plan (changes hourly in this new world > we live in) has AA deferring most new deliveries and > as earlier stated, AA wants to replace 717s with
> additional 737s.

I think AAR90's watch and mine are set on different time zones. I'd wager that they are gone a lot sooner than that and won't be around to see the big ball drop in 2003. But then again, I'm on Pacific time and Andy is probably used to being on Zulu time...  Smile


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Hapend To TWA´s 717´s posted Thu Aug 14 2003 02:04:13 by GALLO_MEXICO
Does AA Wish They Had Kept TWA 717's Now? posted Thu Jan 30 2003 04:05:56 by TrnsWrld
TWA 717 Question. posted Wed Jan 22 2003 15:47:22 by Sinlock
TWA 717's Still In The Desert? posted Mon Oct 14 2002 15:54:10 by 717fan
Airtran And The Ex-TWA 717's posted Sat Sep 21 2002 08:13:23 by 717fan
Ex TWA 717's At AirTran...... posted Fri Aug 30 2002 06:16:10 by ChautauquaFA
One More Time: TWA's 717 posted Fri Aug 23 2002 01:46:13 by 717fan
Bangkok Air Takes 2 Ex-TWA 717's posted Fri Jun 21 2002 09:51:24 by 717fan
TWA 717 In Full Colors (minus Titles In Osaka) posted Sun Jun 2 2002 22:06:38 by Clipper471
TWA 717-200s posted Fri Apr 5 2002 22:33:05 by Qcairport04