Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aircraft Involved In 9/11  
User currently offlineBlueJet From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 397 posts, RR: 4
Posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

Good Day-
Recently, I was talking with a friend of mine whos father was on the American Airlines jet that crashed in to tower one. Has any part(s) of the plane(s) been found? Or would something like that be virtually impossible in all the rubble. I dont know I felt bad for him, so I was just wondering.
Thanks..


25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRen41 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

I beleive they found a large piece of debris shaped like a cockpit and a person in it that was probably one of the hijackers. Also they found a FA with her hands tied together. Hope this helps

**Ren41**


User currently offlineGibberish From Switzerland, joined Sep 2000, 424 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1776 times:

I recall seeing a picture of the landing gear of one of the 767s. I'm no 100% positive though.

gibberish


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1775 times:

No way would they find the cockpit, that would be in a zillion peices after an impact at that speed!
Iain


User currently offlineSvenvdM From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1745 times:

Did they actually find the CVRs and FDRs of the two 767s that crashed into the WTC? I never heard or read a transcript of what the terrorists said in those last moments.
Sven


User currently offlineUAL1837 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1719 times:

As far as I know, all they have found are a 10 foot piece of the American plane, and some seats from the United plane.

User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 4780 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1712 times:

They did find one of the hijackers passports in the wreckage.

User currently offlinePilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

>>No way would they find the cockpit, that would be in
>>a zillion peices after an impact at that speed!

Actually, they did find the cockpit of one of the airliners. It was resting on a roof of a nearby building! I guess in the explosion it was flung off.

- Neil Harrison


User currently offlineMark2102 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 350 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

I saw pictures on cnn that they found the tires of one of the planes that crashed into the WTC. They also found a chunk of the body of the aircraft. Sorry to hear.  Sad

Mark


User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

You can quite clearly see parts of the United 767 pass through the other side of Tower 2 if you watch the video taken from the side (not the one from the park where you see it impact the building in front of you.) It looked an awful like the cockpit/nose section of the plane to me. I remarked about that on 9/11 when I was watching the footage as it was initially broadcast.

That seems consistent with the searchers finding part of the cockpit on the roof of a nearby building.

redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5049 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1561 times:

Why wouldn't it have just gotten crushed?

I think there will be hundreds of bodies that will never get recovered. The crash produced a very hot fire along with the crushing force of the collapsing building. Most of them were "vaporized" or reduced to a fine powder mixed in with all the other powdered remains of the offices.

That's one reason I think the WTC site should be a memorial or some sort. Hundreds of lives were not only ended there but they have become a permanent part of the site.



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1550 times:

Find a part of the cockpit? This is complete B.S. because going at a 100m/hour would leave a car without the whole nose section. The airplanes were going over 500 miles an hour, so nothing but small debree of stuff from the back might be left to recognizable shape, but the first part would've never survived that crash...


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1550 times:

The airplanes were going over 500 miles an hour

Where did you hear that?


User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5643 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1537 times:

I think there will be hundreds of bodies that will never get recovered. The crash produced a very hot fire along with the crushing force of the collapsing building. Most of them were "vaporized" or reduced to a fine powder mixed in with all the other powdered remains of the offices.

At least 20 bodies have been found in the past few days. Debris-removal work is now down into the basement areas of the towers, where there are some voids in the wreckage which have allowed bodies to remain reasonably intact. The existence of these voids was known right after the collapses, and it was originally thought that some people might have survived in them, but unfortunately that was not the case.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1532 times:

Airplanes go really fast, on the chart that I have it lists the speeds. Like 747-100= 589 miles/ hour


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1521 times:

Airplanes go really fast

Thanks for the information. But that doesn't prove anything.


User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 16, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1513 times:

If they thought of how to attack America and where in the world trade center to hit so that fire trucks cant reach the blaze and enough weight on top so that it will fall, I'm sure they thoguht of the speed they would've gone in it.

Enough for you? You're picky, but it's cool with me



I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineRyu2 From Taiwan, joined Aug 2002, 490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Have they recovered the CVRs or FDRs yet? Or have they determined that they were totally destroyed?

User currently offlineNikonF100 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1493 times:

I highly doubt that the FDR/CVR will be found. They probably melted in the first hour or so after impact. They are made to withstand high-temperatures, but there is no way they can withstand both high-temps and the impact/weight of the falling tower.

I hope I am wrong though...

Vafi--589 mph is the crusing speed of a 747. The 767 does not have 4 engines. The 767 was not crusing. The 767 was at a low altituide, and if they hit 590 mph the plane would have broken up. That's well above Vmo.



User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4194 posts, RR: 37
Reply 19, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1473 times:

Actually the airplanes were going around 330 knots or so.. thats redline speed close to sea level in jets. The 747 isnt much faster than the 767. Having two engines doesnt make that much of a difference.

It was around 350 mph they hit.



Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1462 times:

It was around 350 mph they hit.

That sounds more like it.

Vafi88, I'm sorry if I sounded harsh. I've actually been curious about the pre-impact speed, but hadn't heard anything about it.

500 MPH just sounded way too fast at that altitude.


User currently offlineSpacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3624 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1429 times:

They've found most of both aircraft that hit the WTC, all of the one that crashed in Pa. and I'm guessing (but not sure) all of the one that crashed into the Pentagon. Just think about it; every last scrap of debris has been cleaned up from the Pentagon and all of the surface debris has been cleaned from the WTC. As they clean, they sift and sort. No, not every tiny 1mm piece of airplane is going to be identified among all that wreckage, but plenty of planes have crashed at higher speeds than this and have been 80-90% reconstructed.

I've personally seen large portions of the cabin, seats, landing gear, wings, and various other parts of the planes that hit the WTC. That's just what's been on TV - the NTSB and FBI no doubt has the rest sectioned off somewhere.

Think about where these planes hit and how the wreckage would be distributed. The planes hit near the top of each tower; the towers collapsed straight down. The airplanes would be near the top of the pile. At the moment, what's left at the WTC site is underground debris as well as buildings 3, 4 and 5, which all need to be torn down. That's a lot of debris and it's what constitutes the nearly 50% of the total that's being quoted as being left. The towers, though, and pretty much everything in them (including the airplanes) has been removed with the exception of one stubborn wall. The airplane parts that I saw on TV were at the landfill where the debris is being taken, and I have no doubt that nearly 100% of both planes are there and have been identified to a large extent.

The CVR and FDR have not been found as far as I know. If they had been, there's a good likelihood they'd be damaged beyond repair. The city is actually dunking every truckload of debris in a bath of water to try to activate the pinger from the FDR, and none has sounded yet - meaning it's most likely not operational as I've no doubt the FDR and CVR were in one of these debris piles (possibly as unrecognizable wreckage).



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1414 times:

That wall will be preserved. It will be on display in a museum in NYC. 3 WTC is already gone. 4 5 and 6 are partially destroyed and will not be torn down until the 1 & 9 Subway and Path lines below are secured so that heavy equipment can roll over to it's spot and begin demolition. I guess the 1 and 9 lines from Chambers to South Ferry will come on line before you know it. The PATH station is intact along with the entrances but the tunnels leading to it are flooded and caved in. One of the beams from the South Tower went through the 3rd rail! The Sation itself is not underneath the towers but the tunnels we're.


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1381 times:

I agree 350 mph sounds acceptable for a 767-200 at SL. Even doing this speed they would probably have been close to VMO. But 500mph is not possible at SL- it is possible at higher levels FL350 etc.

User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5643 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

4 5 and 6 are partially destroyed and will not be torn down until the 1 & 9 Subway and Path lines below are secured so that heavy equipment can roll over to it's spot and begin demolition.

These buildings already are in the process of being demolished. One segment of the 1 & 9 tunnel was filled with concrete to allow heavy equipment to operate above without danger of cave-ins. Nothing of that sort was needed with the PATH tunnels, although a smaller concrete "plug" was inserted on the New Jersey side to minimize the danger of flooding.

I guess the 1 and 9 lines from Chambers to South Ferry will come on line before you know it. The PATH station is intact along with the entrances but the tunnels leading to it are flooded and caved in. One of the beams from the South Tower went through the 3rd rail! The Sation itself is not underneath the towers but the tunnels we're.

Pictures of the damaged IRT 1 & 9 tunnel and its Cortlandt Street station can be seen here. Note that parts of the station are completely collapsed, while other parts are nearly intact (even the light bulbs are unbroken). It was this tunnel, not the PATH tunnel, that was pierced by a beam.
The PATH station suffered a partial collapse, but in general is in better shape than Cortlandt Street.
No one has yet come up with a timetable for reopening the 1 & 9 line. It is possible that the Transit Authority may rebuild it along a different alignment, as it would be more useful to the World Financial Center and Battery Park City if it ran farther to the west. No matter what's decided, the line's unlikely to reopen for another few years. PATH may reopen within two years if all goes well.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineSvenvdM From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1269 times:

<< The city is actually dunking every truckload of debris in a bath of water to try to activate the pinger from the FDR, and none has sounded yet - meaning it's most likely not operational as I've no doubt the FDR and CVR were in one of these debris piles (possibly as unrecognizable wreckage). >>

That's very interesting. So they only start pinging when they're submersed or wet? Is it possible to overlook them although they're bright orange?  Confused


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aircraft Involved In Litvinenko Affair posted Fri Dec 8 2006 23:59:49 by Bennett123
SIA To Announce Aircraft Orders In 11/2 Hours! posted Fri Sep 29 2000 10:45:52 by GUNDU
Aircraft Type Involved In The Most Accidents. posted Mon Oct 10 2005 00:38:26 by Captaink
Wich Aircraft Was Never Involved In An Accident? posted Mon Jul 8 2002 03:42:30 by Jgore
Small Aircraft Crashes In Germany posted Sun Nov 26 2006 21:08:12 by A342
Aircraft Assembly In Saudi? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:01:10 by HiJazzey
Aircraft Going In Circles Shortly After Takeoff posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:18:49 by Quickmover
Small Aircraft Crashes In Northern Brazil posted Mon Oct 2 2006 19:39:50 by Antiuser
BA A321 Involved In Search & Rescue Over North Sea posted Tue Sep 19 2006 15:37:56 by Fbgdavidson
Light Aircraft Crashes In Snowdonia, North Wales posted Tue Sep 12 2006 23:49:29 by SteveBerch