Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United Planning To Get Rid Of Their 747s?  
User currently offline2cn From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 648 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3735 times:

Before I get blasted by United fans, I want to state this is an uncomfirmed rumor that I've heard and am just posting to see if anyone knows any more info, or to see if this is totaly false.

Now.. a friend of my parents who works at United (she is a F/A on the Sydney route) said the inside rumor/news/scoop/whatever going around was that part of the reoganization of the airline was they were planning to get rid of their entire 747 fleet due to the pilots having negotiated such an exorbinate rate to fly them. She said that if/when they do get rid of the 747, they plan to replace them with the 777 since they pay the pilots less to fly the plane, and it still has the range needed. Any truth to this rumor? Anyone else hear this?

I sure hope they dont get rid of them since there are sure a small ammount of US carriers flying the 747, would hate to see United get rid of them

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5294 posts, RR: 61
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3638 times:

Hello,

There were exactly the same rumours pre-11/09. However many things have changed since then and I honestly don't think UA have the $ or € to replace any aircraft. Anyway, the value of 2nd hand B744s are currently extremely low, wrong time to get rid of them.

Jeremiah



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3617 times:

Makes sense as UA cant fill the 744's.But its a buyers now so I dont see them getting much back for them unless they are leased.

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3597 times:

United grounded about half of there 747 fleet. The ones left, are mainly flying between United's hubs such as SFO-DEN, DEN-LAX, ORD-DEN, etc.

I'm not sure about the rumor. I hope its not true...



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineScooter From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

Not saying that it isn't true, but I doubt they'd do this anytime soon. What would happen to thier NZ/Australia flights? Can a 777 make it from LAX to SYD fully loaded? What about ETOPS issues?

-Scott


User currently offlineClimbout From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3557 times:

And that will leave the US with just ONE airline (Northwest) with 744s. How sad.  Sad

User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

Wow...I've been gone too long from this forum obviously, since United's 747 fleet has apparantly been scaled down to what...20 planes now!?! At last count it was 5 in storage, but now they've sent at least an additional 15 to the yard? Ya' sure, BA...?

Oh, and as per Apollo, Donder10, all of United's 747 loads are amazing...absolutely amazing. If only you worked for the company and could actually see the loads which they're carrying...

As to why the would retire the 747 due to pilot costs, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. So they retire the 747's to quit paying for the "exorbinant" 747 pilot salaries, yet they continue to pay the exorbinant 777 pilot salaries...yeah...real bright move.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3397 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

Paying millons on top of millions to swich to a 777 fleet to get out of a few hunderd thousand dollars a year (the difference in pay from a 747 to 777 pilot) seems to be vastly disproportionate and a huge waste of money.

User currently offlineSFOintern From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 770 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

These rumours were swirling around long before recently. The only way United would replace 747-400s is by Boeing or Airbus offering them sweet deals for either the 777NGs or A340NGs, at almost give-away prices.

While these big mamas cost a fortune to operate, the prices paid for them were pretty sweet under the deals Wolf & Greenwald negotiated, and they are mostly paid off.

Parking them seems the best solution until traffic picks up. Simply put, if it costs ANYTHING (even a dime) for United to replace the 747-400s, it will NOT do it. United is cutting back ALL potential expenses, even new pilot bunks in the 777, and redirected all funds to AVOLAR  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

  • SFO

  • User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2147 posts, RR: 10
    Reply 9, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3485 times:

    Yeah...let's redirect all our funds to "Avolard" while we have 20% of our workforce on unemployment....good move UA...well..at least they are consistant.

    User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 10, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3481 times:

    cause Avolar is instant income  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

    United hasn't grounded 1/2 of their 747s. There are no immediate plans to ground the fleet as they don't have a sizeable operation to cover the route decreases. They have, however, put a few in maintenance and have a few sitting around airports longer than normal. Their average flying time per day has dropped, but not to the point they are grounding the birds, which most are owned!!!

    -nate


    User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8017 posts, RR: 5
    Reply 11, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3455 times:

    Why on Earth will UA sell off their 747-400 fleet? The planes are mostly paid for anyway and UA will just temporarily lower their utilization until the economy picks up.

    Besides, the UA 744's will probably by 2005 get 777-style interiors and probably next-generation jet engines to extend their life to at least 2015-2016.


    User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
    Reply 12, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

    How about ETOPS? Flying through the middle of the Atlantic, there is no airport for thousand of miles.  Confused
    Better learn to swim Big thumbs up



    Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
    User currently offlineSerge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 2
    Reply 13, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3426 times:

    I don't believe this will ever happen, or maybe its that I don't want to believe it could happen.  Big grin

    This would really be awful considering the routes they fly as well, SFO-DEN and ORD - DEN and vice versa of course.... My brother is flying home tomorrow and he'll be on the following UA aircraft in order: 747-400, EMB-120 Brasilia, Dornier 328, 777 Big grin And I will be lucky enough to fly same routes in February to see him  Smile

    ...Serge


    User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 14, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3404 times:

    What if 744 are gone. How do fly non stop ORD-HKG, SFO-SYD, LAX-SYD and JFK-NRT? United's B777 can't fly non stop SFO-SYD and ORD-HKG. If United buy B777-200 "LR" would be fine using long range non stop. I don't know about ORD-Delhi soon.

    Big777jet

    PS - I hate to see go away 744. I wish UAL should keep some of 744 fleet.



    User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2147 posts, RR: 10
    Reply 15, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3392 times:

    UA no longer flies the 744 ORD-DEN-ORD. They downgraded it to a 757. Makes about as much sense as everything else they've been doing lately.

    User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
    Reply 16, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3345 times:

    With the current Economic Situation, their second hand B 744s worth nothing...... And if they sell all 44 B 747-400s, the most number of B 777-300ERs they can get is about 10.........

    UAL will not sell any of their B 747-400s. They simply need them. They are cashcows for UAL and some of them will be PARKED for the time being until the Economy Picks up.

    They may consider the B 747-400ER in the future..... Only time will tell. However, United has been a B 747 operator for a very long time.


    User currently onlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5331 posts, RR: 11
    Reply 17, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3309 times:

    Very Unlikely just at the moment!

    BA where on Earth did you here that.
    They are still flying routes like LAX-AKL, LAX-SYD, SFO-SYD, ORD-HKG plus a tonne of flights to Narita!  Smile


    User currently offlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6568 posts, RR: 55
    Reply 18, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3305 times:

    UA currently has FOUR 747-400s parked, N173UA, N183UA, N184UA and N186UA, according to Skynet, United's internal intranet. UA will possibly park more 744s as a few more 777s are delivered but I think that the 744s will be back in service by summer when traffic might pick up and routes are restarted. The777Man


    Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
    User currently offlineIAHERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 677 posts, RR: 7
    Reply 19, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3219 times:

    Any airline that would retire an expensive fleet type due to labor costs on the aircraft should never have operated that type in the first place. United Airlines management has not made the best decisions over the last few years but I've got to believe this is completely a unfounded rumor. Anyone who believes the salaries of the pilots flying a 747 are percentage wise a major factor in operating the aircraft needs some lessons in airline economics. It would cost 10 times more to train the 747 pilots (The most senior on average) on the 777 (which is where most would go), and retire the fleet. Then you train the mechanics and try to get rid of the spare parts inventory etc. etc. I just doesn't make sense. Retiring a fleet type is something done to save real money in the long run. Pilot salaries just don't add up enough to warrant a decision like this.


    Actually flown: EMB-120 EMB-145 B717 B737 B757 B767
    User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
    Reply 20, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3223 times:

    Big777Jet wrote:
    What if 744 are gone. How do fly non stop ORD-HKG, SFO-SYD, LAX-SYD and JFK-NRT? United's B777 can't fly non stop SFO-SYD and ORD-HKG. If United buy B777-200 "LR" would be fine using long range non stop. I don't know about ORD-Delhi soon.



    May I remind you that the 777-200ER actually has more range than the 747, so all of those routes which you stated can be flown with a 777. JFK-NRT already went to a 777 earlier this year, as well as several other Pacific routes. One of the longest 777 Pacific route is ORD-PEK.

    In responce to ETOPS, a 777 can fly from the west coast to SYD/AKL. It would fly on the same path as a 747 with out ETOPS restrictions. I've put a link to a map for the great circle mapper, showing the routing on SFO-SYD, LAX-SYD, LAX-AKL with ETOPS 180, and with out.

    ETOPS 180
    http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=SFO-SYD%0D%0ALAX-SYD%0D%0ALAX-AKL&RANGE=&PATH-COLOR=&PATH-UNITS=mi&RANGE-STYLE=best&RANGE-COLOR=&MAP-STYLE=&ETOPS=180

    Non-ETOPS routes:
    http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=SFO-SYD%0D%0ALAX-SYD%0D%0ALAX-AKL%0D%0A&RANGE=&PATH-COLOR=red&PATH-UNITS=mi&RANGE-STYLE=best&RANGE-COLOR=navy&MAP-STYLE=

    The only route that would remotly be a problem on the south pacific runs would be LAX-AKL, and that is hardly a problem.

    United Airline wrote:
    With the current Economic Situation, their second hand B 744s worth nothing...... And if they sell all 44 B 747-400s, the most number of B 777-300ERs they can get is about 10.........

    UAL will not sell any of their B 747-400s. They simply need them. They are cashcows for UAL and some of them will be PARKED for the time being until the Economy Picks up.

    They may consider the B 747-400ER in the future..... Only time will tell. However, United has been a B 747 operator for a very long time.


    Just because United has been a long time operator of the 747 doesnt mean that they will always be an operator of them. If you call United Services and request it, you could actually lease a 747, or a 747 engine. I guess now they are bringing in some money for United, being spare parts for others.

    RayChuang Wrote:
    Why on Earth will UA sell off their 747-400 fleet? The planes are mostly paid for anyway and UA will just temporarily lower their utilization until the economy picks up.

    Besides, the UA 744's will probably by 2005 get 777-style interiors and probably next-generation jet engines to extend their life to at least 2015-2016.


    By 2005, the 747s will not have the new 777 interior. Why should they put it in? There is no logic behind your statement at all. United has other things to spend their money on then your beloved 777 interiors.

    With the engines, the 747s have the same engines as the 763. Those engines are just a smaller version of the engines on the 777. So, if you think that getting new engines on the 747s makes sence, with your logic we should re-engine the entire widebody fleet.

    FLY777UAL wrote:
    As to why the would retire the 747 due to pilot costs, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. So they retire the 747's to quit paying for the "exorbinant" 747 pilot salaries, yet they continue to pay the exorbinant 777 pilot salaries...yeah...real bright move.

    Exactly! You hit the nail on the head!

    I L U V 7 6 7


    User currently offlineBaxter From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 6 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 21, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

    With the current Economic Situation, their second hand B 744s worth nothing

    I'd hardly consider approx. $120mil each to be "nothing". Yes, market value is below blue book value right now, but that doesn't mean they are worth "nothing".

    A 777 can fly from the west coast to SYD/AKL. It would fly on the same path as a 747 with out ETOPS restriction

    You just keep telling yourself that. Sadly reality is much different.


    User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 22, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3175 times:

    serge,

    your brother flying via Sioux Falls, SD??? an Embraer Brasilia connecting to a DoDo prop?? only city that I can think of that gets Skywest EM2s and AWAC DoDos is Lincoln Nebraska or Sioux Falls..

    David,

    The 777 can't track properly along the route to Australia from LAX. You'd burn too much fuel trying to get to a 180 min radial for ETOPs... it would be like flying a path similar to Pee Wee Herman's Connect-The-Dots thing from PeeWee's Play House (you have to remember that show!)

    -nate


    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    AS To Get Rid Of Free Meals On Mid-Cons posted Mon Jul 17 2006 06:10:12 by RwSEA
    NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s? posted Tue Jun 27 2006 17:13:54 by Flying Belgian
    Why Did Silkway Airlines Get Rid Of Their DC8s? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 11:12:51 by Airevents
    When Will EgyptAir Get Rid Of Their 737-500's? posted Tue Jan 24 2006 23:44:49 by RichM
    DL To Get Rid Of It's 767-200s And 737-200s? posted Sun Nov 7 2004 18:57:31 by CLT18R
    Biman Wants To Get Rid Of F-28 - Month Old posted Sun Jul 25 2004 18:32:09 by GF-A330
    Why Did SAA Get Rid Of Their A320's? posted Fri Jan 3 2003 19:34:13 by American 767
    Gulf Air Future Plans - To Get Rid Of Widebodies posted Sun Mar 24 2002 18:04:12 by GF-A330
    AA To Get Rid Of TWA 717's By End Of The Year? posted Wed Jan 30 2002 05:04:26 by Westjet_8
    Gulf Air To Get Rid Of A340s And A320s posted Sat Dec 1 2001 01:43:34 by GF-A330