Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas Or United To Sydney?  
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 50
Posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2476 times:

I may be fortunate enough to visit Australia upon my graduation in two months, so I was wondering what is the better airline to take to Sydney....QF or UA? I will be flying out of New Orleans, so a connection in LAX or SFO would be required. I have never been on a 747, so I'm excited regardless of the airline. I have a feeling that QF would be a better choice. Your opinions and insight would be greatly appreciated.


Thanks!


Stephen in New Orleans

45 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAirNewZealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2542 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2340 times:

How bout AirNZ?? They have the best Economy and Flight attendants on this route..(THough QF can be close in FA's!!)

They have a direct flight to SYD....arriving in the morning SYD time.

But if you really want to choose from those two, then QF is the better, in my opinion!! All though i have only compared them on the AKL-MEL route....it was QF who topped it off!!

Cheers
mikey


User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2335 times:

Stephen,

I have flown SYD-LAX countless times, with NZ, QF & UA. However only in biz, so I can't comment on the back of the bus.

All three airlines in biz were fine, with NZ having the upper hand in the service stake and UA/QF being more modern.

From reading many trip reports I would have to suggest that NZ as having the best economy product - but if you want PTV's I beleive UA has them fitted on some of the 744's.

Now, if you like a few drinks (alcohol) then go with QF or NZ as both airlines are happy to ply you with alcohol.

Cheers,

mb


User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5520 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

I tout AirNZ, but I'm a little bit piqued with them over the whole Ansett thing. If you're flying economy, NZ's the hot ticket.

It is de rigeur to hold out QF as the flawless paragon of airline virtue (see, Rainman), but some frequent commuters 'twixt Oz and US with whom I've been acquainted (and they're Australian) prefer U.

Bottom line: all three are fine carriers.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39886 posts, RR: 74
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2296 times:

QUANTAS!

Haven't you seen the movie Rain Man? Big grin


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Glenn Alderton




Seriously though, when I fly to another country I prefer to fly that country's national carrier to get the full in your case 'Aussie experience'. You can fly United anywhare anytime here in the US.
How many opportunites will you have flying to Sydney?




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Frank Schaefer




Bring back the Concorde
User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39886 posts, RR: 74
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

Ooooops! Embarrassment

Sorry for the typo! Embarrassment

I meant Qantas!  Smile



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineKaiTakFan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1588 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2281 times:

Hahaha good correction superfly! I was about to say...
Anyways I dont think UAL has PTVs in Economy class yet. Everytime I fly down to SYD its in Biz class and I have never once seen PTVs in Y class when I take a walk down the aisle's mid flight. Although I am a die hard UAL fan and fly them all the time non-rev, I will say fly ANZ... I really enjoyed their seats on the 747-400! Have fun and drink heaps of VB while your there!

Cheers!
Brian


User currently offlineCap'n Dan From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2270 times:

I flew UA LAX-SYD in Biz, and SYD-LAX in Econ back in 1997. I was not particularly impressed with either. Business class was not much better than domestic biz (i.e. no ptvs, poor recline), and econ was, well, pretty standard. FAs were rude and bitchy. I can't speak for Qantas, though...

User currently offlineMurf From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

good quick save superfly, There's people on this forum who'll tear you a new asshole for mis-spelling qantas.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

I like UA and Air NZ. Air NZ's coach seats have foot rests too. An added bonus


murf


User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39886 posts, RR: 74
Reply 9, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

Thanks for the warning guys!

I better thank my lucky stars!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6293 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2223 times:

There is no U in Qantas! Sorry, just had to do it.

I do agree with you. I always fly the national carrier when I vist another country. Not just for the cultural experience. To me, it is a matter of politeness. I also don't go to McDonalds or Burger King in another country. This is not being polite, I just hate them both.



Damn, this website is getting worse daily.
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5111 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

Qantas gets my vote



Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32782 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

UA does not have PTVs on thier 744s and I don't think we'll be seeing them anytime soon. However, if you fly Qantas, some of thier 744s (and eventually all, but right now a very small number) have PTVs. Don't know about AirNZ.


a.
User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7190 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2204 times:

KaiTakfan,
I didn't think that many NSWers drank VB (Victoria Bitter)...thought it was more of the Tooheys/Fosters state... Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39886 posts, RR: 74
Reply 14, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

Don't worry about PTVs.
They are over-rated anyway. There is less legroom with a PTV anyway because of the mechanism below the seat in front of you.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineCrosscheck From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2194 times:

Qantas only has PTV's fitted on 2 747-400's at this stage, with a third due online January 2002. VH-OJR is one of the aircraft fitted with PTV's, and this aircraft is config'd for Pacific flying, and often operates the SYD-LAX sector. VH-0JE and soon to be VH-OJC are both config'd for European operations, and are unlikely to be seen in the USA. My suggestion is to fly Qantas.

User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2192 times:

Mah4545 wrote:
UA does not have PTVs on thier 744s and I don't think we'll be seeing them anytime soon. However, if you fly Qantas, some of thier 744s (and eventually all, but right now a very small number) have PTVs. Don't know about AirNZ.

Actually, all of UA's 747s have PTVs...just not in coach. I know, its sad, but, it is an evening flight, and most passengers choose to sleep when flying south. All of the business class seats, as well as flight suites have PTVs.

United features Economy Plus giving passengers additional room.

I L U V 7 6 7


User currently offlineKaiTakFan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1588 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week ago) and read 2153 times:

Well Aero... I know that VB is all over Australia on tap and not to many other beers can claim to that! But fosters... hmm dont think anyone drinks fosters down there! only seen it happen once!! VB all the way!

User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 18, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2125 times:

I have never flown UAL so I guess I am in no position to compare Qantas and UAL. Flew Qantas before and I must say they are excellent. Give Qantas a try. I think no matter what flight you choose, you will still feel good........................... because you are flying in a B747-400!  Smile

Not to forget a trip report for us!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

alvin



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineTrentis From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

For service in Y I'd definitely recommend NZ across the Pacific

User currently offlineB20XX From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2094 times:

I flew UA twice to SYD, once in Y on once in Y+. The extra few inches in economy plus make a lot of difference on a 14-15 hours flight. Anbody knows the seat pitch on QF or NZ?
BTW, I've never seen PTVs on UA 744.


User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5085 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2094 times:

Qantas.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Marlo Plate




Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineE7plnr From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 103 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

Have flown both UA and QF LAX-SYD during the last two years.
Both have similar service in Y.
I would have to agree with the analogy of flying with the National airline. It's just a better experience!

Fly QF!!!!!


User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3504 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

Well, I haven't flown either airline between LAX-SYD (actually I've never been to OZ). But I will be flying UA LAX-SYD in First in February, and QF domestically during that trip (SYD-CNS), so I'll post a report in March!

One thing to consider: If you sign up with the UA frequent flyer program, and take United (or NZ for that matter), you'll get about 15,000 frequent flyer miles, which is more than half-way towards a free domestic ticket in the US.

Alternately, if you are an AA flyer, I believe you get AA miles when flying Qantas (although I'm not sure about that).

Just something to think about: With which airline do you want the ff miles?


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

I agree with the national airline angle.
In the past I've flown SQ to Singapore, TG to Thailand, VN to Viet Nam, QV to Laos, BA to the UK, KL to the Netherlands etc etc. It gives a wider perspective and a chance to experience and airline you can't fly from the US to anywhere else!


25 Jupiter2 : Personally I would chose QF, but also remember that all the QF flights to Australia from the states are code shares with AA, so technically you could
26 Vafi88 : My friend went to Sydney on Monday. I say go with Qantas because that is an international airline and you'll get the Australian experience of flying.
27 MSYtristar : Thanks for the input everyone. If I do get the chance to go, Qantas will most likely be my airline of choice. They have some good connections out of M
28 Ben88 : It's not going to make much difference. It's going to be almost 15 hours of dark, cramped, agony no matter what airline you take, so pick the cheapest
29 Rmenon : My 2 cents. I have done SFO/LAXSYD/MEL many times on all 3 carriers. If you are in Biz - take either QF, UA, NZ - not much difference. If you are trav
30 Post contains images Aerorobnz : Fly whichever airline flies New Orleans to LAX & then take Air Tahiti Nui from LAX....via PPT & AKL then fly onto SYD from AKL with QF on their AC 763
31 USAFHummer : MSY, I took Air NZ from LAX-SYD-LAX in Y class this summer, and I highly enjoyed the flights. I can give you a completely unbiased opinion on Air NZ i
32 Post contains images SegmentKing : go with united. You'll have enough miles for a one way north america upgrade when you get back. Don't forget Economy Plus... you can't reserve it in a
33 Pilottim747 : You've got to go QANTAS or Air NZ! Their service is way out of the league for Airlines in the U.S. Great food and nice legroom (34" on NZ). Between th
34 Pblaketas : Tasmanian Premium beers are becoming very popular in the money. Both James Boag and Cascade are truly excellent beers, though about $5 a pop. James Bo
35 Post contains images Marara : Nah, you mob stuff the beer, Bundy's the REAL THING ! QF gets my vote with NZ a very close second
36 Ryanb741 : If QF have upgraded the 744 cabin on the flight you take then go with them, otherwise I recommend UA.
37 QANTASforever : Either one really. I agree with whoever said that it will be 14 hours of cramped dark agony whatever carrier you are on. Personally, If i was going Y,
38 QantasAirways : Now, out of those choices, I would definately say QANTAS!!!!! I would say that this is one chance to experience Qantas - as said, you can experience U
39 Doug_or : never flew quantas, but between ANZ and UAL, definately ANZ, just make sure its not a UAL jet w/ a ANZ codeshare.
40 QANTASforever : This post was referring to three airlines, Qantas, United Airlines, and also Air New Zealand. I dont believe I have ever heared of an airline called q
41 Post contains images AlexG : Hi! Last february, I was taken to Sydney on British Airways 744 (G-CIVZ, #28854) and went back to LHR on Qantas 744 (VH-OJF, #24483), both on most ine
42 Japanguy : My vote is for Qantas. I took them to get to SYD and back 2 years ago and it was the softest landing I have ever had in a 747! It was very interesting
43 Boeing777/747 : I think the best of the worse would be Qantas. The flight is too long to enjoy.
44 QantasAirways : Well said, Qantasforever, I indeed would like some information about this airline "Quantas" also. Mind you, last time I checked, www.quantas.com goes
45 VirginA340 : Qantas is the better airline. Don't waste your hard earned $$$$ on UAL. Qantas is way better in service.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas & United To Keep Trans-Pacific Duopoly posted Wed Jun 15 2005 17:26:45 by Oakmad
United To Sydney,Melbourne & Auckland. posted Sun Sep 23 2001 11:57:53 by ZK-NBT
Qantas Or Cathay In F Class To Sydney? posted Tue Dec 4 2001 01:12:44 by Djcrooks
United To MTY Or GDL In Mexico? posted Fri Dec 2 2005 00:09:51 by Pzurita1
United Or TED To MDW? posted Mon Nov 24 2003 04:36:29 by GalvanAir777
Brisbane-Sydney... Qantas Or Ansett? posted Tue May 22 2001 07:42:52 by QantasAirways
Qantas Increases Flights To San Francisco . posted Mon Dec 18 2006 15:29:15 by Juventus
Female CEOs 1:5. Optimistic Or Correct To Mention? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 12:24:29 by Boeing777/747
Why No EWR Or IAH To BUR On CO? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 03:28:19 by COEWRNJ
United To Increase Mainline BIL - DEN posted Sat Nov 11 2006 23:30:07 by Stapleton