MSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6387 posts, RR: 50 Posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2391 times:
I may be fortunate enough to visit Australia upon my graduation in two months, so I was wondering what is the better airline to take to Sydney....QF or UA? I will be flying out of New Orleans, so a connection in LAX or SFO would be required. I have never been on a 747, so I'm excited regardless of the airline. I have a feeling that QF would be a better choice. Your opinions and insight would be greatly appreciated.
Stephen in New Orleans
Next trip 6/12 - 6/15: MSY-SEA on AS, SEA-LAX on VX, LAX-N.O on Amtrak
Seriously though, when I fly to another country I prefer to fly that country's national carrier to get the full in your case 'Aussie experience'. You can fly United anywhare anytime here in the US.
How many opportunites will you have flying to Sydney?
KaiTakFan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1587 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2196 times:
Hahaha good correction superfly! I was about to say...
Anyways I dont think UAL has PTVs in Economy class yet. Everytime I fly down to SYD its in Biz class and I have never once seen PTVs in Y class when I take a walk down the aisle's mid flight. Although I am a die hard UAL fan and fly them all the time non-rev, I will say fly ANZ... I really enjoyed their seats on the 747-400! Have fun and drink heaps of VB while your there!
Cap'n Dan From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2185 times:
I flew UA LAX-SYD in Biz, and SYD-LAX in Econ back in 1997. I was not particularly impressed with either. Business class was not much better than domestic biz (i.e. no ptvs, poor recline), and econ was, well, pretty standard. FAs were rude and bitchy. I can't speak for Qantas, though...
IMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6252 posts, RR: 35
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2138 times:
There is no U in Qantas! Sorry, just had to do it.
I do agree with you. I always fly the national carrier when I vist another country. Not just for the cultural experience. To me, it is a matter of politeness. I also don't go to McDonalds or Burger King in another country. This is not being polite, I just hate them both.
Is grammar no longer taught is schools? Saying "me and her" or some such implies illiteracy.
Mah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32012 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2120 times:
UA does not have PTVs on thier 744s and I don't think we'll be seeing them anytime soon. However, if you fly Qantas, some of thier 744s (and eventually all, but right now a very small number) have PTVs. Don't know about AirNZ.
Crosscheck From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2109 times:
Qantas only has PTV's fitted on 2 747-400's at this stage, with a third due online January 2002. VH-OJR is one of the aircraft fitted with PTV's, and this aircraft is config'd for Pacific flying, and often operates the SYD-LAX sector. VH-0JE and soon to be VH-OJC are both config'd for European operations, and are unlikely to be seen in the USA. My suggestion is to fly Qantas.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2107 times:
Mah4545 wrote: UA does not have PTVs on thier 744s and I don't think we'll be seeing them anytime soon. However, if you fly Qantas, some of thier 744s (and eventually all, but right now a very small number) have PTVs. Don't know about AirNZ.
Actually, all of UA's 747s have PTVs...just not in coach. I know, its sad, but, it is an evening flight, and most passengers choose to sleep when flying south. All of the business class seats, as well as flight suites have PTVs.
United features Economy Plus giving passengers additional room.
KaiTakFan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1587 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2068 times:
Well Aero... I know that VB is all over Australia on tap and not to many other beers can claim to that! But fosters... hmm dont think anyone drinks fosters down there! only seen it happen once!! VB all the way!
Mr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2040 times:
I have never flown UAL so I guess I am in no position to compare Qantas and UAL. Flew Qantas before and I must say they are excellent. Give Qantas a try. I think no matter what flight you choose, you will still feel good........................... because you are flying in a B747-400!
B20XX From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2009 times:
I flew UA twice to SYD, once in Y on once in Y+. The extra few inches in economy plus make a lot of difference on a 14-15 hours flight. Anbody knows the seat pitch on QF or NZ?
BTW, I've never seen PTVs on UA 744.
Travelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1977 times:
Well, I haven't flown either airline between LAX-SYD (actually I've never been to OZ). But I will be flying UA LAX-SYD in First in February, and QF domestically during that trip (SYD-CNS), so I'll post a report in March!
One thing to consider: If you sign up with the UA frequent flyer program, and take United (or NZ for that matter), you'll get about 15,000 frequent flyer miles, which is more than half-way towards a free domestic ticket in the US.
Alternately, if you are an AA flyer, I believe you get AA miles when flying Qantas (although I'm not sure about that).
Just something to think about: With which airline do you want the ff miles?
AJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2381 posts, RR: 25
Reply 24, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1939 times:
I agree with the national airline angle.
In the past I've flown SQ to Singapore, TG to Thailand, VN to Viet Nam, QV to Laos, BA to the UK, KL to the Netherlands etc etc. It gives a wider perspective and a chance to experience and airline you can't fly from the US to anywhere else!
: Personally I would chose QF, but also remember that all the QF flights to Australia from the states are code shares with AA, so technically you could
: My friend went to Sydney on Monday. I say go with Qantas because that is an international airline and you'll get the Australian experience of flying.
: Thanks for the input everyone. If I do get the chance to go, Qantas will most likely be my airline of choice. They have some good connections out of M
: It's not going to make much difference. It's going to be almost 15 hours of dark, cramped, agony no matter what airline you take, so pick the cheapest
: My 2 cents. I have done SFO/LAXSYD/MEL many times on all 3 carriers. If you are in Biz - take either QF, UA, NZ - not much difference. If you are trav
: Fly whichever airline flies New Orleans to LAX & then take Air Tahiti Nui from LAX....via PPT & AKL then fly onto SYD from AKL with QF on their AC 763
: MSY, I took Air NZ from LAX-SYD-LAX in Y class this summer, and I highly enjoyed the flights. I can give you a completely unbiased opinion on Air NZ i
: go with united. You'll have enough miles for a one way north america upgrade when you get back. Don't forget Economy Plus... you can't reserve it in a
: You've got to go QANTAS or Air NZ! Their service is way out of the league for Airlines in the U.S. Great food and nice legroom (34" on NZ). Between th
: Tasmanian Premium beers are becoming very popular in the money. Both James Boag and Cascade are truly excellent beers, though about $5 a pop. James Bo
: Nah, you mob stuff the beer, Bundy's the REAL THING ! QF gets my vote with NZ a very close second
: If QF have upgraded the 744 cabin on the flight you take then go with them, otherwise I recommend UA.
: Either one really. I agree with whoever said that it will be 14 hours of cramped dark agony whatever carrier you are on. Personally, If i was going Y,
: Now, out of those choices, I would definately say QANTAS!!!!! I would say that this is one chance to experience Qantas - as said, you can experience U
: never flew quantas, but between ANZ and UAL, definately ANZ, just make sure its not a UAL jet w/ a ANZ codeshare.
: This post was referring to three airlines, Qantas, United Airlines, and also Air New Zealand. I dont believe I have ever heared of an airline called q
: Hi! Last february, I was taken to Sydney on British Airways 744 (G-CIVZ, #28854) and went back to LHR on Qantas 744 (VH-OJF, #24483), both on most ine
: My vote is for Qantas. I took them to get to SYD and back 2 years ago and it was the softest landing I have ever had in a 747! It was very interesting
: I think the best of the worse would be Qantas. The flight is too long to enjoy.
: Well said, Qantasforever, I indeed would like some information about this airline "Quantas" also. Mind you, last time I checked, www.quantas.com goes
: Qantas is the better airline. Don't waste your hard earned $$$$ on UAL. Qantas is way better in service.