Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SIA Receives More Then Recognition  
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 819 times:

I heard SQ is a state owned company and that new aircraft are sponsored indirectly by the government as are other costs by means of tax cuts, low contributions to (state owned) infrastructure etc.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Craig Murray

Is this right ? That would place them in the group Air France, Iberia & Malaysian and give to total new perspective to the (very good) service they provide ...

Folks, am I too hard on them now (christmas time)?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 13265 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 791 times:

No, although there is an element of state ownership, SIA does not receive state aid and has always been self financing. It is actually one of the world's most profitable airlines.

User currently offlineCarmy From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 627 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 787 times:

The airline is about 54% owned by Temasek Holdings, which is the investment arm of the Ministry of Finance in Singapore. The airline however works independent of the government, and it is taxed accordingly as required by Singapore law.

There are no government subsidies in the workings of the airline, and the Singaporean government has stated more than once that it does not interfere in the running of the airline. One example I can think of now, is the recent AN-NZ-SQ saga. Apparently, SIA had asked the Singaporean government for help in communicating with the Aussie and Kiwi governments, but the government flatly refused to. It felt that SIA, as a publicly listed company, should be responsible for its own actions, and the government had no intention of asking the Aussie or Kiwi government for any help at all.

State money is NOT used by SIA to buy new planes. If you don't already know, SIA has one of the healthiest balance sheets in the entire aviaion industry, and has never announced a loss since its inception in 1972. The only other airline that can equal this feat is Southwest, and that airline is catering to a budget market, completely different from the market SIA targets. The airline has absolutely no need to ask for help from the Singapore government.

You are not being too hard on the airline. You have made a number of false assumptions, that simply because the airline is state owned, the government subsidises everything. You obviously have an extremely gross misunderstanding as to how Singapore and her companies work.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus: A320 Firm Orders, More Then 5000 posted Wed Jan 24 2007 15:19:05 by Manni
A320 With More Then 40,000lbs Of Fuel posted Tue Aug 23 2005 17:50:58 by Jetblue15
Paris Air Show: More Then A Lot Of Hot Air posted Mon Jun 13 2005 20:52:15 by BCAInfoSys
SIA Wants More A380s - Or 747 Advanced posted Sat Jun 11 2005 16:39:45 by NA
LH Will Not Allow Res More Then 90 Days In Star? posted Fri Sep 24 2004 16:21:28 by TonyBurr
Boeing Receives More 737NG Orders posted Fri Sep 10 2004 01:20:32 by Kalakaua
Varig Receives 1 More MD-11 posted Mon Apr 12 2004 03:53:36 by GUGA
Airports With More Then 2 Towers posted Mon Aug 11 2003 17:12:04 by Lamyl_hhlco
National Airlines Receives More Aircraft! posted Mon Apr 22 2002 07:37:07 by National_757
Alitalia Posts Record Loss Of More Then 900 Mln. E posted Thu Mar 28 2002 15:28:07 by Emile