Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ATA 2nd Hub?  
User currently offlineTimberwolf24 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 576 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1138 times:

Rumor has it that ATA is looking to open a 2nd hub possibly on the west coast spring of 2002. ATA does have alot of new aircraft on order and they all wont go to Midway. Anyone have any thoughts on where the new hub might be and what cities they might serve?


Living in LA, ORD/MDW will always be home!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5239 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1107 times:

being HQ'd in IND, that might be an option. West?
maybe, LAS if they could get their hands on National.



The best IFE: A window seat and a good book.
User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1104 times:

Too much competition in LAS.

Not only is there National, but you have Southwest and America West too that basically have hubs. I know Southwest doesn't really hub, but they have a HUGE presence there.


User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3037 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1094 times:

Wouldnt it be its third hub city? they have Midway , IN and this new one ifd they get one. Or isnt IND classed as a hub city?

User currently offlineFlyChicaga From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

MDW is the only hub at the moment. IND is the HQ, however is not a hub. All flights and transfers go through MDW (hence why Chicago Express is now d/b/a ATA Connection there). Regarding a west coast hub, who knows. Nobody is talking. However, there will be six 757-300s that are being used to fly strictly Cali-Hawaii runs for Pleasant Hawaiian Holidays vacations. Also, some L1011's are being used for the Funjet vacations out of MSP and MKE, and in the future those are expected to be done by 757's and/or 737's. With four added destinations in February, and hopefully a better gate situation in MDW with the new terminal, the number of aircraft we're going to have isn't going to create a need for a west coast hub.

To be honest, we do need a hub there so people can take advantage of ATA without having to always connect through Chicago. Right now, if someone in MYC wants to go to Orlando, ATA isn't the best option. The same is true for someone going from LA to Seattle. If there are hubs out west and east, this will help ATA tremendously in the long run. So would starting a frequent flyer program, but we won't begin on all the things that ATA needs to get it's act together on. For the times as they are now, I say everything is going REAL good here.


User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3037 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1080 times:

Does anyone think that Sacremento , Califorina could become a hub, or a base for the west? It isnt a base for any carrier but has a decent sized market and a good position.

User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1070 times:

Sacremento is too small.

There really aren't any hub cities left. If they were going to do anything in Cali, maybe Oakland would work, but the airport is pretty tight.

AA has a strong lock on SJC, SFO is full, Fresno is like Sacremento, too small, San Diego is too small and full. Ontario isnt developed enough, Orange County is well, too rich, LAX is packed, there is nothing.


User currently offlineAfitch7881 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 816 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1070 times:

Why is SMF too small? The location is pretty good, not much traffic with the relativley new terminal? Didnt they serve over 8 mil in 2000? I dont think anything over 7 mil is considered too small for a airline like ATA to hub at. Look at MDW, not too big in itself.


Eric







User currently offlineBoeing in pdx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1060 times:

How about PDX we have a larged unused terminal.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AirTran 2nd Hub Short List posted Sat Oct 29 2005 06:13:20 by Indy
Airtran To Expand DFW (possible 2nd Hub) posted Wed Jan 26 2005 17:46:11 by Aaflt1871
ATA's New Hub...Toledo? :) posted Wed May 19 2004 04:01:04 by Ouboy79
ATA Southern Hub posted Tue May 4 2004 17:58:26 by ChiGB1973
ATA "hub" At PIE posted Tue Apr 6 2004 15:51:59 by 7E72004
Airlines' International "2nd Hub" posted Tue Nov 4 2003 10:57:49 by Qexonial
ATA PIE Mini-hub Question posted Wed Apr 12 2006 22:54:46 by 7E72004
Status Ryanair's 2nd German Hub posted Mon Mar 11 2002 19:53:10 by TC-MNC
Bali To Become 2nd Garuda Hub posted Thu Nov 29 2001 06:27:54 by Lindy field
ATA Receives 1st & 2nd 757-300 posted Wed Aug 8 2001 23:19:23 by Boeing nut