Kcle From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 686 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 912 times:
If I was to upload this pic to this website, it would be instantly rejected, even though it is the first pic of a 737-900 at CLE.
It's nice to see something so big that fills the void the 757's left when they were pulled out, and the 737-900 will hopefully keep all of us CLE spotters intrigued until the CLE-LGW flight is re-instated.
CcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2204 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 856 times:
Yeah I know how that is. They don't care what the picture is about they want it to look good and what did you take that with? If you get a picture of a Co 757-300 let me know I have some ATA 757-300 pictures too.
"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
Kcle From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 686 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 798 times:
I blew the pic up to 400 % of the original size, and reduce it down to 1024 x whatever, and I'll see what it looks like. I use Ulead PhotoImpact 6 to edit my photos, but I can't sharpen the pic, because my chinsy scanner turns the dark areas into colors. If I sharpen, the black parts become very bright and colorful. You can even see that in the pic above, look fwd. of the engine, and the shadowed area is all nasty purple and red. I'm not even going to bother posting the new one, because it looks worse. All over the new one there are colored areas that are supposed to be dark, so I just deleted it. I do not have a choice of dpi, but I know it's got to be low. My scanner is an HP 2100C ScanJet.
777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 20 Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 781 times:
Hate to spoil the fun, but that ain't no 737-900!
Can't quite make out the full reg, but I do see a "2" rather clearly in there, which would make the aircraft ship 2**, and all aircraft with the last three digits of the reg starting with 2 in our fleet are 737-800s. If I'm not mistaken, the 737-900s are all in the 400s. Perhaps somebody in the company more familiar with that can bail me out.
Here's a picture of a real -924 just for verification: