Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SQ6 Report Due In Mid-February  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Yahoo Extract
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/020105/5/singapore16803.html

SQ006 crash final report to be out mid-Feb

Investigations into the crash of Singapore Airlines flight SQ 006 in Taipei about 14 months ago are complete and a report on the findings is likely to be released by the middle of next month.
Isnin Sohot, one of 13 surviving crew member aboard the plane, returned to the skies last May but not without some trepidation.

Isnin, an in-flight supervisor, said: "I did my first solo flight, if I'm not mistaken, to Brisbane. It departed from Singapore. It was at night and it was raining...but once airborne... it (fear) slowly subsided and back to normal."

Another SQ006 crew who has been given the green light to return to flying is Amir Husin.

He'll fly to Perth in Western Australia next week in his first flight since the crash in October 2000.

For the leading steward, it was never a question of whether he'd return to work, but when.

His family, however, doesn't share his enthusiasm.

He said: "At first they were very very against my intention to fly but as time can heal the wound.... I talked to them.....I said that all this is fate, and they started to realise that all I said are true."

But flight stewardess Charlynn Chua isn't so confident.

She said: "I feel a bit more pessimistic in life. I used to feel that accidents won't happen to me, like what everybody thinks. But now it's different. Actually it does happen to me so I'll get more pessimistic, like being afraid of accidents and things like that."

In fact, Charlynn is so afraid of loud noises and vibrations that she doesn't even take the MRT.

She hasn't decided if she'll return to flying or opt for a ground job with SIA.

In the meantime, she's pursuing a long-distance MBA at an Australian university.

SIA is supporting her financially.


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1902 times:

Straits Times:

SQ 006 crew get on with their lives

Of the 13 who survived Taipei crash, one plans to do her MBA while another will join the two who have returned to work

By Krist Boo

FOURTEEN months after SQ 006 crashed on take-off in Taiwan, more of the 13 Singapore Airlines (SIA) crew who survived the tragedy are getting on with their lives.

One is taking up a Masters in Business Administration course, while another will join two other colleagues who have already returned to work.

The airline would not say how much it is spending to help the crew, but it is understood that for 19-year-old stewardess Farzana Abdul Razak alone, the carrier is picking up the US$150,000 tab (S$278,000) for her treatment at an American hospital.

Of the survivors, she was the most seriously hurt, with 45-per-cent burns.

SIA, it is understood, will also pay for her stay there and for a family member to remain with her for several months while she is treated.

It will also pay $16,000 for the two-year MBA course in Australia that former stewardess Charlynn Chua, 23, is pursuing, and will have a job for her when she finishes.

Leading steward Amir Husin, 35, will report next week for his first working flight - to Perth. SQ 006's chief steward Isnin Mohamed Sohot, 47, has since been promoted to inflight supervisor, and steward Shahrin Shah Kamarshah, 25, got back to work several months ago.

Mr Isnin, who has been with the airline for 22 years, was the first to ask to return to duty. 'Hopefully, my action will give inspiration to my other colleagues,' he said.

Four SIA cabin-crew members were among the 83 people who died as a result of the Oct 31, 2000 accident, when flight SQ 006, a Boeing 747-400, burst into flames after ploughing into construction equipment on a partly-closed runway in Taipei.

The surviving crew's unhappiness with SIA's move to stop paying them their allowances, which can come to 70 per cent of their total pay, made headlines last year.

SIA has since reinstated these allowances and, yesterday, said that the other crew still recuperating would continue to get their pay.

Monthly gatherings have helped the survivors deal with the trauma, but some still have nightmares. Said Miss Chua: 'I dream that I'm on a plane, and the plane is taking off; and I wake up very tense.'



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

I assume the report will try to say it was all the airport in Taipei's fault ??

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1883 times:

If you have prior information HKGSpotter1, please do share it with us.


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineSenatorto From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1881 times:

To Hkgspotter1

I would like to ask you that under what assumption(s) that make u believe the blame goes to the airport, not the airlines.

Would you share us with the facts that you known regarding the accident, or any expertise or qualification that you have in judging the casue of the accident. At least, i want to know you objective, as well as, subjective beliefs in aviation accident investigation.

Just a little test on yourself: Would you result in the same conclusion of your own if the accident happened in HKG.?


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

Just a side note, it was due for December last year. Does anyone know why it's delayed?

Senatorto: I agree.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineJesseycy From New Zealand, joined Aug 2001, 343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1842 times:

I just want to make this clear once and for all, so please give me a fair answer, don't be prejudiced.

I heard on BBC, one evidence was the flight recorder, Air traffic control telling SQ to go on the runway 23L (I think I'm wrong with the number), but the pilots mistook it for 23R (I am wrong again, I'm sure, abt the runway numbers). So if the pilot misheard the runway numbers, when it's clear from air traffic control, doesn't the blame lie mainly with the pilot?

Any previous report I can read from? By the way, sorry about the runway numbers, I have a real short memory.


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

ATC told the Flight Commander to use runway 05L. However for some reason the plane went onto 05R.

There are many other factors, however I think that is the answer you wanted.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineCarmy From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 627 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

Jesseycy: I don't remember the inccident you mentioned, but what I do remember is that the Captain had mistakenly gone to 02R when the instructions from the ATC was to go to 02L. Now we've got to put the inccident into context, which is that weather was terrible at the time of the accident and that the Captain had almost no way of knowing if he was going onto the correct runway or not, since visibility was poor. (Not too sure if the correct runway is L or R, relying on memory now)

So the Captain goes into the runway which he mistakenly thinks is 02L. Why did he make such a mistake? There're several reasons for this. Firstly, the Taiwanese airport authorities in their infinite wisdom left the runway lights on. So basically what you've got are two runways which both look open to the pilot. And of course there was a China Airlines pilot who witnessed the entire fiasco but made absolutely zero, nilch attempt to contact the ATC. Why did the Taiwanese airport authorities leave the runway lights on? Didn't they know that it would confuse the pilot?

Secondly, when a runway is closed, the airport is supposed to put a huge sign with a cross on it so that the plane cannot possibly enter the runway, unless of course the pilot hits the sign down. Again, our wise Taiwanese airport authorities didn't do that. They jolly well knew that there was construction debris on the runway, but they didn't bother to close it.

Thirdly, despite TPE being prone to heavy storms and bad weather, the Taiwanese haven't got any sort of ground radar in their airports. I remember reading in The Straits Times that the air traffic controllers sometimes cannot even see the runway when visibility is poor, and the only way they can know what is happening on the ground is through communication with the pilot.

And remember how the Taiwanese refused to release the pilots? How the pilots were kept under arrest? And they even threatened to charge the three pilots with manslaughter. And remember how they only grudgingly released the pilots when some international pilots' association threatened to boycott TPE. Their high handed way of handling the entire affair, IMHO, was simply just disgusting.

The pilots cannot be completely void of any sort of responsibility, but the airport authorities have to shoulder much of the responsibility in this entire affair.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SIN Not Allowed To Participate In SQ6's Report posted Mon Mar 18 2002 16:56:44 by Carmy
QR Retires A300's In Mid-2008 posted Sat Jun 16 2007 10:57:53 by QatarA340
A380 F-WXXL Will Visit DownUnder In Mid June... posted Fri May 4 2007 06:02:12 by EK413
John Travolta In Mid-air Engine Failure posted Wed Apr 4 2007 09:40:58 by Brenintw
TWA Routes In Mid 90s posted Sat Feb 10 2007 18:40:16 by LongHaul67
Route Map: US Big 6 Domestic In Mid-90s posted Mon Dec 11 2006 05:40:25 by Jimyvr
UPS MD11 Due In To BFI 3:30 posted Tue Sep 26 2006 21:41:44 by Clickhappy
Ousted Thai Pm Due In London This Afternoon posted Wed Sep 20 2006 14:53:58 by Joshdean
Remembering Madrid Barajas Airport In Mid 90's posted Tue Jul 4 2006 20:06:35 by RAFVC10
Same Thing Diffrent Day At MAN.anthing New Due In? posted Wed May 24 2006 22:40:21 by BradWray