Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Way To Dodge Foreign Ownership Limits?  
User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1908 times:

Though there has been some loosening of airline ownership rules in recent years, particularly in the European Union and in Australia and New Zealand, foreign ownership limits are still in place in a number of countries, usually set at 25% or 49%.

Is there a way to do an end-run around these restrictions?

Imagine if a foreign company were interested in acquiring a majority stake in an airline, and a majority of shareholders were interested in selling -- but faced with the brick wall of foreign ownership restrictions prohibiting the transaction.

But instead of walking away, the foreign company quietly approached shareholders with an agreement: the shareholders would continue to be the legal owners of their shares, but the foreign company would assume the costs and risks associated with owning those shares if the shareholders agreed to do the foreign company's bidding. The agreement could include a provision allowing the shareholders to keep a percentage of any dividends for themselves, or receive a fee or other benefits for acting as the foreign company's proxy.

Would it work?

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAndreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1888 times:

Basically I don't think so.
1. You'd need an extensive documentation of such a transaction structure, that outlays pretty clearly the economic substance of the whole thing, therefore it could be identified as fraudulent evasion of governing law.
2. There'd be an accounting problem: The foreign company would under several standards (US-GAAP, IAS, even German Trade law) be forced to consolidate the airline, as these standards "look through" the formal structure into the substance (form over substance), and the so-called control concept would have to be applied (if you are the one who takes all chances and all risks, you're considered to be the real owner of the company, formal shareholding notwithstanding).

Of course it would be fun to come up with a structure to evade this, which btw is my job, and I could think of a few things to evade the accounting problem, but there's another problem coming up: Law changes to render my solution ex post worthless.

So, I'd say: No, not before some laws are abolished or at least changed!

I know it's only VfB but I like it!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Status Of Foreign Ownership Limits posted Tue Apr 12 2005 21:37:10 by StevenUhl777
Qantas Fails To Lift Foreign-Ownership Cap posted Tue Aug 13 2002 09:12:33 by Singapore_Air
QF Told To Remain Aussie To Up Foreign Ownership posted Sun Mar 3 2002 23:28:36 by Singapore_Air
Foreign Ownership/Open Skys Bill On Way To Pres posted Thu Jun 8 2006 14:19:39 by Lowecur
USA To Consider Lifting Foreign Ownership To 49% posted Wed May 28 2003 00:14:30 by Singapore_Air
Airline Food - Way To Make Money? posted Tue Dec 5 2006 20:05:29 by Jelle
Lufthansa Foreign Ownership Over 45 % posted Sat Nov 25 2006 09:40:21 by Columba
AK/KL Foreign Ownership Reached 47% posted Wed Nov 15 2006 20:25:42 by Goldorak
What A Way To Trave posted Wed Nov 8 2006 05:17:08 by Fiedman
Any Way To Know Exact Reg Of Specific Flight? posted Tue Oct 31 2006 04:55:03 by VikingA346