Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Ditching Asia?  
User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2939 posts, RR: 6
Posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 971 times:

I (as many may know) was (initially) disappointed with BA for withdrawing its LHR-Kuala Lumpur service last year. It was however a blessing in disguise for me, as after 20 years of flying BA on the route - I gained very few FFPs but just liked them for their efficient, professional service. Since then, I have binned my Silver BA Exec. Club card and quickly gained Silver membership with KLM/Malaysia and Air France (Blue) instead - but best of all - I had come to realise that although BA's service is professional, it lacked the flair and charm of MAS and Air France. So all in all a bit of a double bonus for me - I suddenly enjoy flying again!

Does anyone living in Taiwan, Philippines and also Malaysia feel much like me that after many years of BA loyalty - BA is just deserting its passengers by withdrawing services completely instead of trimming them appropriately in these hard times?

Will BA ever regain its regal status in Asia as a good European carrier as it continues to cut its passenger base in Asia?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 937 times:

Where's the problem when you connect through HKG on flights from TPE or MNL? Stopover in a BA aircraft or changing from a CX aircraft to BA is almost the same. And CX's service is probably much better than BA's...
Other European carriers also withdrew from several airports in Asia. Who else flies to KUL? KLM? And? Who else flies to TPE?
Alliance connections can easily replace unprofitable direct flights and it seems that's the way of the future.


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 901 times:

That's right, and as Rod put it in similar words, BA can no longer be regarded as an extension of the British Foreign Office, flying here, there and everywhere just for the hell of seeing a little piece of Britain a long way from home.

I don't know why KUL was dropped, but similar has happened in other areas of the world, where it makes more sense to transfer pax on to other airlines.

BA is a business, rather than a state-owned public service, therefore it pursues routes where the demands are 'right'.

Plenty of people may want a LHR-KUL flight, but for one reason or the other, BA is not prepared to provide such a service-maybe they've made a big mistake, maybe not.

I have to say that it nevertheless does surprise me that KUL is not served by BA...


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Was The Reason For BA Ditching GE90? posted Sat Apr 6 2002 02:14:10 by The Coachman
BA Ditching Asia? posted Tue Jan 22 2002 13:13:18 by Mas777
Swissair Asia, Air France Asie, BA Asia, KLM Asia? posted Mon Nov 22 2004 04:19:45 by Ual747
BA Long Haul Services To Asia posted Mon Oct 25 2004 17:50:07 by Wheelsatc
BA 777-200ER To Asia? posted Sun Jan 5 2003 11:38:24 by United777
BA Routes To Asia? posted Mon Nov 18 2002 20:30:32 by Qantas777
Does BA Fly Its 'Asia' Planes Only To Taiwan? posted Sat Jan 19 2002 15:41:12 by Hkg_clk
BA Asia Running Transatlantic Routes posted Thu Jun 28 2001 07:54:28 by USflt1778
BA, Swissair, KLM Asia Etc Etc posted Tue May 29 2001 13:48:44 by Shamrock105
BA Asia Airways posted Sun Mar 25 2001 11:53:59 by Erela