Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WN In ATL  
User currently offlineDrupyUSE From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 66 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 11 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

Can anyone tell me why Southwest doesn't go into ATL? With all their expansion and growth in the past few years it seems that they would want to at least have a few flights into such a large market. Is it simply a matter of gate space at Hartsfield or is their some other reason?

Drupy

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyer732 From Namibia, joined Nov 1999, 1368 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1439 times:

Because they aren't stupid.
They wouldn't survive in ATL with Delta and AirTran.


User currently offlineN202PA From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1562 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1425 times:

Delays, delays, delays.

Southwest, as a rule, avoids large airports where traffic delays would foul up their nationwide operations. Atlanta, being one of the busiest airports in the nation (or *the* busiest, depending on who you believe), is particularly prone to this, as evidenced by the recent Atlanta snow/ice storm that screwed up operations for airlines across the country.

There has been some noise about Southwest going to Peachtree or DeKalb, but as Flyer732 mentioned, why would they bother with putting their resources towards the ATL market when they'll have to compete with one of the Big Three, *and* another discount carrier? There are plenty of virgin markets getting assaulted by the majors with less competition, and these are the markets that WN is going to put their resources towards developing. It only makes sense that they do this.

Perhaps in 10 years, after WN has maxed-out the medium-tier markets, they'll be ready to start a serious, all-out assault on the fortress hubs. At the rate they're going now, it could take even less time than that. But just look at the long-term strategy: become the strongest you can be serving your bread-and-butter markets, all the while taking traffic away from the majors and weakening them, *then* start cutting into their markets when their weak profit margins can't sustain attempts to run you out of business. Simply brilliant.


User currently offlineJonPaulGeoRngo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1379 times:

I agree that Atlanta is not in Southwest's vision.

Although, I think its safe to say that no one except the folks in Dallas know -->for certain<-- where Southwest is headed and the timeline they'll use to get there.

Predictions that Southwest would never alter the livery and never dump the plastic boarding cards - essentially two of things that make Southwest, well Southwest, have both been shelved for newer approaches.

Delta, United, Northwest & Company all realize that Southwest may not always fly under their radar and seek secondary airports. Southwest has the muscle to shove aside any of these airlines if they so choose. Nothing would surprise me.


User currently offlineScottb From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6826 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1344 times:

As others have said, Southwest avoids congested hub airports because they find it easier to make money at less-congested, smaller airports. Airplanes make money in the air, not by being twentieth in line for takeoff behind a slew of Delta and AirTran planes. Moreover, it just isn't as profitable for Southwest to go up against a large network major carrier at its hub. The incumbent carrier has the advantage of a frequent flyer base and the ability to set fares to meet or beat Southwest's. While it's likely that Southwest could make money even in that sort of scenario, they can make EVEN MORE money by adding service to underserved, high-fare markets. Essentially, they can continue to grow most profitably by going after the lowest-hanging fruit.

I agree that Southwest will go after the major hubs once they've exhausted the possibilities available in small-to-medium-size markets. My gut instinct is that they'd go after weaker hubs like MEM, PIT, etc. first.


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8913 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1284 times:

And remember Herb's line:

"It'll be a cold day in hell before we serve Atlanta"

Jeff


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4528 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1285 times:

Bingo Scottb....ATL does not make sense for Southwest. If, say, PDK were something along the line of Midway--an air-carrier-ready airport with a vacant terminal-- (and not located near Buckhead SuperNIMBY's) Atlanta might be a possibility. But the existing situation where only busy DL- and FL-dominated ATL is really an option, makes that market unattractive to WN.

Yes, Atlanta has a very large O & D base, and if another airport were available, Southwest might consider it. But there's way, way too much fruit out there that hangs much lower, as someone else already noted.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2903 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1246 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

For further discussion, I'd suggest doing a search. We've had a number of thorough discussions on ATL's suitability for Southwest in the past.

User currently offlineZrb2 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 899 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

Off topic a little- but when I lived in Atlanta there was talk about Briscoe Field in Gwinnett county possibly positioning themselves for some limited commercial service in the future. It would be great for the people in the Northern suburbs. Anything ever come of this?

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8036 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

I really doubt that WN will serve ATL due to the heavily entrenched competition between Delta and AirTran.

Now, if Atlanta, GA had a second airport with commercial service it wouldn't take long before WN shows up.  Smile


User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2614 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1179 times:

Briscoe Field- No commercial service allowed by airport charter.
Rumor, from a good source says. SW pumped a bunch of money into this airport through some back channels to get the runway lengthed so a 737 could land there. The runway got built and news leaked about SW possibly starting service there. Ofcourse the Nimbys jumped in with a little help from Delta's friends in government the airport charter was changed. PDK has the same restiction I believe.


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4528 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (12 years 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1163 times:

It's amazing what different responses Southwest elicits in different cities. Most cities would move heaven and earth to get Southwest, and their low fares and economic-development potential. They have this strange idea that low fares improve quality of life, and help businesses to better connect with their partners or offices elsewhere.

The response around Briscoe Field sounds a lot like the response around Trenton-Mercer airport in New Jersey, where Southwest has also shown interest. Rich NIMBY's around West Trenton and Ewing Township have blocked plans to lengthen TTN's runway to handle fully loaded 737's. One TTN-area NIMBY leader even recently waved around a letter from WN demurring on service for now, as if this was some kind of trophy.

One might as well wave one's bloody nose around as a trophy after having hacked it off of one's face, but some people have very distorted priorities.

And shame on the local government for allowing Delta to get the charter changed!

Jim




Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 11 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

Actually Briscoe Field and PDK aren't the only airports in the Metro Atlanta area to be the base of proposed scheduled ops. FTY was being proposed back during the 80s but the NIMBYs and Delta and Eastern raised holy hell. Tara Field, south of ATL was even being touted, but the NIMBYs sruck again. If WN was to enter GA, SAV and AGS would be the most likely cities. And somebody beat me to the punch on Herb's line....

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flashback:DL 727 In ATL. posted Thu Jan 25 2007 01:57:40 by United_Fan
Ice In ATL posted Wed Jan 17 2007 04:23:00 by DeltaL1011man
Stuck In ATL Overnight...anyone Else? posted Wed Jan 3 2007 06:44:31 by IAD51FL
Who Handle's US Air's Baggage In ATL posted Mon Jan 1 2007 03:33:56 by AtlBill
Spirit Of Delta Museum Dedicated In ATL posted Sat Dec 16 2006 01:21:15 by OttoPylit
Midwest Start Date In ATL posted Wed Dec 13 2006 15:34:28 by 767-332ER
WN In SEA posted Tue Nov 28 2006 21:44:13 by Nwray
New Gates For Airtran In ATL posted Wed Nov 1 2006 17:56:57 by Quickmover
What's Going On In ATL Right Now? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 01:58:55 by DLX737200
What's Happening In ATL Right Now With ATC? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 22:02:21 by FSPilot747