Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
737 Undercarriage Drag  
User currently offline737-800NG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 812 times:


Hi,
Can anyone tell me if the the drag on the 737 is any greater than aircraft with main undercarriage doors?
If no how is it accomplished.
Thanks.


737-800NG

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 731 times:

Conjecture: I would think there is increased drag, especially considering the slight nose up attitude of all jets in cruise. However, the wheels fit quite snuggly in their opening and the outer side of the wheel has "hub caps".

So all in all, the increase in drag is probably more than compensated for by the reduced weight and engineering of wheel well doors.

Perhaps there are other explanations...

Best Regards,

Buff


User currently offlineRavi From Singapore, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 724 times:

The B737 doors do entail greater drag. The B737-100 didn't have doors to save weight and also because there wasn't much room. Over a short-haul sector the benefits of low weight are more than low drag. The B737NG has the same arrangement to save weight and to give commonality with older models.

Basically, there is no real disadvantage for short-to-medium haul sectors for an airplane with no gear doors due to saved weight. It also reduces maintenance costs, though some suggest that there is increased damage from FOD.

Either way it is a minor issue. If it were a better system, however, I daresay that more airplanes would have this arrangement.


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 708 times:

Doors were not put on the original 737-100 in order to save on weight and cost. They have been kept this way for commonality. You can either have the extra weight of the doors or the slight increase in drag. Basically they are equal to one another. Plus without the door it is easier to get in their and work on something.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6819 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (14 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 693 times:

Don't 737's (some of them, anyway) have some sort of donut that inflates after the gear is in and halfway seals the gap around the tire?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways 737 Seats Question posted Sun Jun 28 2009 18:05:37 by Soxfan
Why Is Aeromexico Retiring 737-700s? posted Mon Jun 22 2009 10:44:01 by AF022
Status B-737-300 CP 2313 "Paititi" / LB posted Fri Jun 19 2009 12:03:09 by 123
Is A 737-700ER Cost Effective In Transatlantic Service? posted Fri Jun 19 2009 06:11:58 by LPSHobby
Delta 737-800 In PHL posted Thu Jun 11 2009 05:54:06 by BrickyardPHL
Where Did N301SW (737-300) Go? posted Mon Jun 8 2009 11:02:50 by N471WN
1st 737-700 Mauritania Aw : Picture posted Mon Jun 8 2009 08:20:28 by FCKC
Former NG 737 At SBN posted Wed Jun 3 2009 19:27:49 by VANGUARD737
Aerogal 737-300 Now Serving MIA? posted Wed Jun 3 2009 16:28:01 by PRAirbus
Delta 737-800 At YYZ? posted Tue Jun 2 2009 16:38:18 by HOONS90