Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is BA Not Willing To Give Up LHR Slots?  
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3009 times:

I'm wondering that how come BA is not willing to give up their slots in LHR in order to receive the permission for BA/AA alliance plan?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3077 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2972 times:


User currently offlineBmi330 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 1450 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

cause of money and how showed they LHR is there home base plus has any other airline in the world been asked 2 do this so they could have an aliance whith another airline a dont thinks plus whats the big deal anyways?

User currently onlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2916 times:

BA has more flights to the US from Heathrow than does any other airline, at any European airport. Heathrow has by far the biggest pax volume to the US of any European airport. BA and AA have 65 percent of that yummy haul right now as it is. They don't want to give any of it up in order to get their massive alliance approved.

Why haven't other airlines--NW/KL, DL/AF, UA/LH--been asked to give up slots in order to get their alliances approved? Because they don't need to. Every USA Cartel carrier that wants can fly to Paris-CDG, Amsterdam-Schiphol, and Frankfurt-Main. There is plenty of competition available to the alliances at those airports. Also, none of those alliances comes anywhere near BA-AA in size.

Only Heathrow, which has the fewest active runways of any major European airport (2) is closed to a limited number of transatlantic carriers (BA, VS, AA, UA). CDG has four runways, Schiphol 5, and Frankfurt 3. The alliances at these airports can be held accountable by competitors if they tried to gouge passengers.

Fortunately, the US Department of Transportation, which finally grew balls and stopped being the floosie of major airlines, told BA and AA they'd have to give up slots at LHR if they wanted approval.

Unless *every* USA Cartel carrier can get access to Heathrow, like they have access to CDG, SPL, and FRA, *NO* BA/ AA! For now, there won't be. But BA and AA will probably try again sometime.


Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineBmi330 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 1450 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2864 times:

why they not just let all us carriers in and bmi then u would have compition

User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6562 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2851 times:


Suggest you use capital letters, punctuation, and spell check to make your messages more readable and understandable

User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5487 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2803 times:

The US airlines have absolutely no right to complain. Every airline had a chance at buying those slots, but they didn't. American bought the slots. Delta, Northwest, and US Airways had a chance to buy those, but they didn't.


Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently onlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 33
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2780 times:

Ummm....Blink, the Bermuda II treaty only permits 2 USA carriers and 2 British carriers to serve LHR. Just how could have the other 4 USA Cartel carriers have bid on them, since UA and AA bought them from Pan Am and TWA as a whole?

Bermuda II must go. All four USA Cartel carriers and BMI must be given the opportunity to buy the slots they need to meaningfully serve LHR, or *NO* BA/AA. The 16 daily roundtrips required by the US DOT would allow a healthy dose of competition.

The Cartel carriers and BMI, of course, couldn't just wholesale move out of LGW on 16 daily roundtrips, and some of them might opt not to purchase slots if they had to split their London operations between the two airports. But they'd have a fair chance. That's about as much as can reasonably be expected.

In the meantime, since the screaming-orc NIMBY's aren't going to allow another runway at Heathrow, BAA ought to work on getting not just express trains but TGV-style bullet trains from LGW to downtown London.


Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2770 times:

For the USA cartel airlines to buy slots at LHR, I have reservations on that idea. No, repeat, o foreign airline has ever paid as much as 1 cent for any slots at any USA airport. Likewise no US carrier has ever had to pay any money for any slot at a european airport. This complicates the situation at LHR even more. If the US carriers had tp pay for slots at LHR, leguslation in the US would probably be enacted pronto for BA to pay for slots at a USA airport. Think about it.

User currently offlineFlyVS007 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 186 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (13 years 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2734 times:

ITs not just a matter of giving up slots - its who they give them up to.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is The Concorde Next To A Runway At LHR? posted Tue Jul 20 2004 16:11:17 by 22right
Qantas Prepared To Give Up Sydney Slots posted Mon May 7 2001 10:53:43 by United Airline
Why Is BA Reducing LHR-Alexandria Flights? posted Thu Mar 17 2005 01:05:26 by Horus
JetBlue To Give Up 5 Slots At LGB/ 3 To AA/2 To AS posted Tue Feb 4 2003 16:44:03 by FATFlyer
Why Do BA Not Fly LHR-DUB? posted Tue Dec 26 2000 17:17:34 by GKirk
Why Is Gatwick Not On The Skyservice Website? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 11:25:41 by 8herveg
Why Is BMed Not Selling Freetown Flights? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 18:28:11 by ZuluTime
Why Is 'IFE' So Important To Pax? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 20:49:26 by Jetpixx
WN Offers To Give Up Gates At Love posted Fri Jun 2 2006 02:16:51 by Barney Captain
Why Is SK Not More Succesful? posted Wed May 17 2006 15:54:05 by Skyhigh