IndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3069 posts, RR: 0 Posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2293 times:
Im wondering why Singapore is such a large airport? I know its a hub, but mainly only for SQ and QF/BA. I ask this as I see tat so many airlines fly to this small country, yet they dont have the same feed traffic as an SQ in this instance. I dont see how the demand is there for all these carriers. Can anyone explain please...
Airpearl From Malaysia, joined May 2001, 963 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2126 times:
Changi is the entry point not only for Singapore; for many, it is also the natural hub for those heading for neighbouring countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia. These three countries alone have a population base of some 200 million people.
Andreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2114 times:
Well, great infrastructure, Changi is one airport that actually works efficiently. I'ver tried that 20 minutes rule from landing to jump into a taxi: It works perfectly well, even during "rushhours". If they work like that behind the stage, too, well...I would use SIN as a hub anytime, and for quite some time there have been no other comparable airports around.
BKK Don Muang is far from being efficient (but I love it!!), maybe the new one..? KUL Sepang: Possibly quite good but wasn't around when Changi grew to be a hub, CLK is too far away, but obviously becoming a hub, too (Those Kaitak memories...).
As a stopover destination SIN is quite lovely...
Lots of good reasons, but what it comes down to: I guess they were there with a workable concept when such a concept was needed for South East Asia. Perfect timing and good execution of a good concept.
IndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3069 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2092 times:
good points there Andreas, but I just wonder how they seem to attract so many carriers from all over the world. With a population of only 3 million it just is strange how big it is. Also SQ is an airline i see falling from grace soon. Its business is mainly transit, and that is a very volitile position to operate in in a depressesd environment. Somehow I just cant see how the demand is driven for airlines like THY, Indian Airlines and Emirates that dont get feed through the city.
Andreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2074 times:
SIN is and has always been geographically in a very good position: Right in the middle (well not exactly) between Europe and Australia, a route that is currently not flown non-stop (and it will stay that way at least for the next 10 years, probably longer), so it's basically a connecting hub to Europe, Australia, East Asia, and you don't need a big city for that, just enough capacity and infrastructure, and they obviously have that. The inhabitants of SIN are, so to speak, a nice add-on in terms of turnover, especially since there are many business people that travel a lot, probably many leisure travellers (living standard is quite high in SIN).
Business travel btw seems to be generally important, as these guys pay a lot of money when travelling.
I guess Dubai/Emirates is currently trying to follow the same strategy, and it might work: Good infrastructure, well-reputed local carrier, good connecting point for the whole Middle East, though even less people living there, (and at least Sharjah and Abu Dhabi have airports of their own), steeply growing tourism, that all travel by air (seems to be a very important point for the Emir of Dubai).
I don't think SINs position is that volatile, they have their position, SQ is tightly bound into Star Alliance, that brings at least StAl carriers to use SIN as a hub, as I said, there are not many airports like SIN close to SIN, and in order to achieve such a position you have to take away customers from SIN, and why should they go, if SIN works efficiently? Competitive pricing? Yes maybe, but SIN will not just sit there and do nothing if, say KUL, uses dumping prices.
Many good reasons I guess, that prove you don't really need a strong domestic market to succeed, though I'll gladly admit, it helps a lot!
Spk From Thailand, joined Jun 2001, 458 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2061 times:
SIN is being used as Star Alliance hub for SE Asia. Lots and lots of transit passengers and far fewer O/D passengers. The design of the airport reflects this by giving a very good facilities for transit passengers.
If you look at the map you'll find that Bangkok is more appropriate hub in terms of its geography but the infrastructure is not there to accommodate transit passengers. I would have gone mad if I were stuck at BKK's transit lounge for more than 3 hours while at SIN there's so many things to do.
And because of the airport, SQ benefits greatly because it receive tons of feeds from many carriers.
The Thai government has expedited the construction of the new Bangkok airport which is supposed to be world-class (unlike the ghetto atmostsphere at Don Muang). If Thailand can win back the airlines it'll in turn benefit Thai Airways which lose a major number of customers because of the airlines' decision to move their hubs to Singapore.
After 30 years of political struggling, the new Bangkok airport is being built at the fastest pace possible. It'll open in 2004-2005.
Flying-b773 From Singapore, joined Apr 2001, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2049 times:
i agree with indianic world that SIN is too big. basically, i dont think SIN needs 2 terminals, let to say the 3rd one.. ok, to be fair, the 2 terminals work pretty well, but the capacity is kinda not very efficiently used. Terminal 1 is busy in the morning, evening, and night. the afternoon is very quiet. As for terminal 2, more take offs/arrivals, but i hope there r more traffic. if the 2 terminals were to combine, i think it would still work quite well..
but just wondering, why is it that the traffic volume is so low in the afternoon, and no traffic during graveyard hours?
Docpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1975 times:
Many many Singaporeans travel at least once a year. Qantas can actually function as Singapore's second national carrier, judging by the number of places to fly to ex SIN. London, Paris, Frankfurt, Rome, Hong Kong, Jakarta, Bombay and all major cities in Australia.
anyway most people flying into SIN never get out of the airport....... On average, only 15% of people on any given SIA flight is Singaporean.
and SQ has the same feed traffic as the rest of the carriers flying into SIN-just the 4 million population base of Singapore. There are no domestic networks to feed into SQ's international network.
Mark_D. From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 1447 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1965 times:
SIN in the years to come I think probably is going to decline in importance, in its 'fuel stopover for European<-->Southeast Asia and Australasia' role, as even more long-range jets come out that bypass that need entirely.Just like Dubai now has to rely much more on its 'regional superhub' status than the fuel-stop-for-longhauls role, that it once had as well.
But, also like Dubai in its own region, SIN still wins out in the infrastructure and also political stability and even also local economic prosperity departments, relative to anything else nearby, even considering major and really quite impressive in their own right upgrades nearby, like KUL recently. And BKK soon, as mentioned above.
So who knows, maybe indeed SIN will experience traffic dropoffs ten or even five years hence, but me I don't expect them to be precipitous, not with air transport numbers still expected to grow generally and worldwide, year by year, even after such shocks as the Sept. 11 attacks and the added concerns passengers now have to face.
SQ772 From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 1807 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
SIN does not have a domestic market to feed it like all the other airports have (except CLK). The bulk of SQ's customers are also NOT singaporeans. Singapore's market is just too small to support a massive airline like SQ. SQ realises this and does not heavily depend on local support to be profitable. If you ask any singaporean, few will tell u that they fly SQ all the time. Most singaporeans (holiday makers etc) will fly any other carriers and not SQ. The reason, SQ is too pricey and singaporeans are spoilt for choice when it comes to carriers flying into and out of singapore.
Most singaporeans would love to fly SQ and are proud of the achievements of SQ, but we are just too price conscious to be paying hard earned money for SQ.
Both Changi airport and SQ use singapore as a hub. The hub and spokes concept is clear here. SQ feeds changi with international traffic and transfers them to the rest of the region. As correctly pointed out by Andreas, SIN is a transit point for the region, and will continue to be so if the region pulls its economic and political act together.
As for why there are so many airlines operating into SIN, well, the answer is pretty clear...Singapore is one of the leading financial and business centres in the region, together with HKG, TYO and now China. Business traffic is heavy and that's why there are so many premium passengers coming here.
No airline will consider operating into SIN if there is no demand. Basically, demand and supply. The reason why THY operates to SIN is simply because there is demand...I don't see why it is so difficult to understand that?
Why does SIN need 3 terminals, you ask. Well, we project and anticipate air travel to grow within the next few years. We plan ahead. SIN will lose its competitiveness if we wait till the airport is over congested before deciding to build another terminal.
GuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1938 times:
Actually SIN is expanding. Land is being reclaimed nearby targeting 2 new runways and a possible 4th and 5th terminal to be built within 20 years. Terminal 3 is currently being constructed and will be completed by 2006. The subway is also being constructed and will link the city to the airport by the end of the year.
Why is SIN so successful? Because it works and it has been planned since its inception in 1981.
As the majority of you who have commented here have not been to Singapore, it is pointless to argue why this city state's airport is so important to the region. Until you've been there, then you'll understand why SIN succeeds as it has been nominated the best airport in the world by numerous publications for the past 20 years.
Andrew From Singapore, joined Dec 1999, 369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1894 times:
The Changi Airport line is an extension of the East-West line, meaning that you do not have to change trains at all to get to the city centre (City Hall or Raffles Place stations). Queenstown, as you mentioned, is about 4-5 stations west of the city centre. It is a residential suburb, and not part of the 'city' as your comment would suggest.
BarfBag From India, joined Mar 2001, 2308 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1805 times:
Andrew: True... my mistake - its not exactly downtown/CBD. I usually get down between Tiong Bahru and Queenstown to go to where I usually stay at Singapore (with my relations). Its good to know the subway will be up and running soon. No more taking cabs from Changi
BarfBag From India, joined Mar 2001, 2308 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1723 times:
Guybetsy: Is a rollaboard too much to carry on the MRT ? I have personally never done so; I take the cab to/from Changi every time. MRT/buses are mainly for traveling between relations' places. Considering I usually arrive in SIN on the midday arrival from SFO/LAX I don't think the MRT would be too crowded then. The only place where I see any hindrance is at the turnstiles. But then the MRT is not the best thing I remember about Singapore All I really recollect (despite my most recent visit being Dec.2001) is the irritating twittering sound before the doors close.