Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
USA-LCY  
User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 910 times:

Ok, I was thinking that rather than flying to Heathrow or Gatwick, if you needed to get to central London, wouldn't it be nice to be able to fly straight to London City Airport? Although it is possible, you have to first fly to Holland, France or Germany which is a little out of the way. So where would be the perfect place to stop? Ireland! Aer Lingus offers flights from Dublin to LCY and has flights from Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and New York. However none of the flights match up and it is impossible to connect.

So... do you think it would be succesfull to Aer Lingus to put their in sync with eachother and make this nice smooth connection. I do. And it wouldn't take much change at all. Either have departure from US an hour earlier or an hour later from Ireland. No biggie.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © James Reppucci



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © AirNikon



What do y'all think?

-aio86



11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 883 times:

LCY is too darn short runway! Impossible to fly widebody jets to serve London City. It will never happen in the future.

Big777jet



User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 875 times:

No I'm not saying direct flights from USA-LCY I'm saying have Aer Lingus put the USA and LCY flights in sync so that passengers can connect. Or maybe BA/BD do the same at Manchester.

-me


User currently offlineRacers22 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 871 times:

I don't think that Aio86 is saying that Aer Lingus should fly widebodies into LCY. He is saying that they should move their time of departure an hour earlier or later so as to make the connection between the flight from the USA and the flight to London City possible. Personally I do not believe that many people would be willing to stop somewhere else in Europe to be able to connect to a flight into LCY. The extra time that they spend making the connection in most cases would probably be more than the time it would take you to get to London from Heathrow or Gatwick. Just my two cents.

User currently offlineTombezza From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 863 times:

Surely the time wasted connecting would outweigh the benefits of arriving closer to the city centre - it would be quicker to travel into London from LHR or LGW than to transfer to LCY. Besides, LCY doesn't even have a tube / DLR station - LHR is only 35 - 45 minutes from central London on the underground.

User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 860 times:

What, BA with their dozens of trans-atlantic flights from MAN?  Insane

User currently offlineParra From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 854 times:

I'm flying SFO-AMS-LCY on Wednesday. Taking into consideration the time it takes to get from LHR to the East End of London it makes sense for me. The flight from AMS to LCY is faster than the London Underground journey from Heathrow underground station to the East End. Also on the return LCY-AMS-SFO flight I'll be able to check in only 30 minutes before departure rather than the usual 2 to 3 hours.

User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 840 times:

Sorry about that I didn't read carefully. OK? Parden me please.

Big777jet



User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 813 times:

Big777jet,

no worries, you are officially pardoned.

-aio86

ps. thanks for all your responses


User currently offlineNG737PSR From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 812 times:

Parra, totally agree with you. I live in Wapping- East London, the benefit of a 15 min taxi ride and 30 min check in certainly sways my decisions on any European/Long Haul flights- some international flights at AMS/FRA only require a 90min connection. For anyone who has to get to LHR from East London you are looking at a 1h 45m Tube ride plus 3hr check in, plus the inherrent stress of LHR being too large and busy. The relaxing atmosphere and quick check in times at LCY just have to be worth considering, for anyone who has not experienced it yet, it's more like an hotel than an airport in terms of ambience.

User currently offlineParra From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 800 times:

I only have a 50 minute transfer:

London (LCY) to Amsterdam (AMS)
Flight: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 2224 (Operated by: KLM UK -- UK2224)
Departure: 8:20 AM (LCY)
Arrival: 10:40 AM (AMS)

Amsterdam (AMS) to San Francisco (SFO)
Flight: Northwest Airlines 8605 (Operated by: KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES -- KL605)
Departure: 11:30 AM (AMS)
Arrival: 1:40 PM (SFO)


User currently offlineJaseWGTN From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 785 times:

Do they still have the leather seats in the departure lounges at LCY? When I flew from LCY to CDG in 1991 on Brymon I am sure the waiting lounge was leather seats...

It was so quiet and laid back (not good for spotters) but great for the traveller


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Can We Book New BA Cityflyer Routes From LCY? posted Tue Jan 1 2008 04:44:51 by 8herveg
USA Today On EAS Program Costs & Benefits posted Mon Dec 31 2007 09:35:08 by VictorKilo
How Is Austrian Doing From LCY? posted Fri Dec 28 2007 12:00:05 by SeansasLCY
Airline Fleet Size - AA Then FedEx In The USA? posted Sun Dec 23 2007 19:35:27 by SM92
Northeast Brasil To The USA: Any News? posted Fri Dec 21 2007 03:57:45 by Sampa737
SQ Routes To USA Pre-747-400 posted Sat Dec 15 2007 23:56:38 by Mozart
USA 3000 At ILM? posted Wed Dec 12 2007 07:55:32 by B757capt
Any News On Shaheen Air's - Pakistan To UK/USA? posted Sun Dec 9 2007 14:59:19 by Gilesdavies
A318: LCY Here We Go...maybe posted Mon Nov 26 2007 09:14:49 by Breiz
Where Will The A380 Be Next In The USA? posted Sun Nov 11 2007 20:07:20 by Tomascubero