Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qualiflyer Group Is Gone…time For New Alliances?  
User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 948 posts, RR: 1
Posted (14 years 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

Accordingly to an Airwise article the members of the Qualiflyer Group decided to formally disband their lucrative alliance. All former members are now free to seek and join other alliances on individual basis.
I see Swiss being invited in Oneworld due to their extensive European network. This is like a ..must have for Oneworld!

Any other ideas, rumors or speculations on who might join whom are welcome on this thread…
Take a look at the other members by visiting for the last time maybe http://www.qualiflyer.com

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2809 times:

Looks like LOT is talking to STAR and Lufthansa at this moment and might join them. Of not they will do oneworld through its AA and BA connections and shareholdings.

User currently offlineSlawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3804 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2802 times:

Let the airlines stay alive and revocer from Spet 11th and the failure of other airlines/alliances, then they can think about going on to new alliances.

"Clive Beddoe says he favours competition, but his actions do not support that idea." Robert Milton - CEO Air Canada
User currently offlineNorthwest_guy From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 218 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2773 times:

I'd like to see some of them team up with Northwest so they can get the Wings alliance off the ground again, but i REALLY doubt that this will happen.

User currently offlineLionel From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 391 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (14 years 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2722 times:

In swiss newspapers you can read today that Qualiflyer will exist in future. So it is possible to collect miles!

User currently offlineLoadcontroller From Switzerland, joined Feb 2002, 85 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (14 years 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2724 times:

I really think that Oneworld would be the best option for ZRH airport. But still as it is not absolutely shure how the new airline (Swiss) is going to develop, AA and BA hesitate what I somehow understand. You don't want a partner who might be gone in a couple of months again...

Besides ZRH would be a great opportunity for LHR and BA to have a hub in central europe.


User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2709 times:

Swiss : Oneworld (logical, Middle S Europe Hub)
Volare : "Wings" (announced, Italy feeder)
Lot : Star (LH dominance in Europe)
TAP : Skyteam (S America Hub)
DAT : Skyteam (used to government deals)



User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3564 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2701 times:

Well if these deals do get off the ground, look for mergers of some sort.


LH and OS are said to be in talks about a future merger, LOT joining them would also seem to be logical and future SK merger into the fold....


Swiss should join this alliance as it is a logical step to strengthen this struggling alliance. ZRH would be a strong base airport for a continental European section of the alliance.


DAT would appear to be too closely geograpically located to Paris to become a partner. By this I mean that their plans do not seem to suit a deal with AF as it would interfere with the CDG hub. TAP well could be in the same situation actually but as a feeder / South American focus carrier could be strong.

' WINGS ' ?

Volare will be a strong feeder, and it could be a very successful match. The south european partner will help build up its network, especially after the farce that occured with the Alitalia partnership. Possibly a KLM Italia???

IMO these will also see a consolidation of carriers into new groupings and ultimately 3 or 4 carriers surviving.


User currently offlineLumumba From Belgium, joined Mar 2001, 369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (14 years 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2672 times:

Hi indianicworld i'm not so sure about you vision on BRU and CDG.
Because there are so close they can be complementary.
Don't forget BRU will never go more than 30.000.000 passengers and they are gooing to construct an AIRport in the middle of BRU and CDG.
If you conect this tree point's with T.G.V than you will have somthing strong?

User currently offlineGaut From Belgium, joined Dec 2001, 344 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (14 years 2 days ago) and read 2635 times:

First Qualiflyer is NOT gone but partners can leave to another alliance if they want.

Can you explain me why OneWorld needs another european partner with a strong partner as BA is?


«Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae.»
User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 948 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (14 years 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2626 times:

In January 2002 British Airways announced that they were working on a restructuring plan that may include a drop on at least 15 unprofitable European destinations. There were few speculations even on this forum as to what those destinations might be…If that's still in the works at BA then Swiss with its existent network could be an attractive partner for Oneworld.

User currently offlineDelta777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (14 years 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2602 times:

Hey anyone got any news about Wings? I really want them to officially start it!

D E L T A 7 7 7

User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 948 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (14 years 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2576 times:

There you have it Volare Airlines is going under... Wings and so Italy is covered by two different alliances.

User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2552 times:

I think Volare is in a better position then ever before.

It will be linked to a powerfull network of healthy carriers and I hope they take the opportunity to expand internationally.

Perhaps there will be a S European "Wings" Hub with its own international connection in the future ...

User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2538 times:

I don't think Volare is still a so strong partner for KLM in the Italian domestic market.
They have to stop all their Sardinia flights from next week.And they want to focus better on the charter market that it's where they get money.
More details here:http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/735959/

User currently offlineHoffa From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 day ago) and read 2524 times:

Swiss tabloids say Swiss Air Lines is currently in talks with Air France about joining Skyteam.

User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (14 years 23 hours ago) and read 2516 times:

Airblue I think phocus wouldn't be Sardinia but the rich North & bigger city's in middle / southern Italy.


User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 948 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (14 years 14 hours ago) and read 2488 times:

It appears to me that Wings Alliance through KLM is set to step firmly on the Italian market and beyond onto the South-Eastern European region. Their immediate target seem to be the Milan-Malpensa Airport as a funneling hub to AMS and beyond. Here is where Volare is well established and fits perfectly the bill by drawing in a lot of domestic traffic.

But get this… a new "Italian" paper-airline is brewing out of Pescara (150 km East of Rome) which is going to be managed and cared for by … MALEV ITALY.

Now MALEV is a… KLM/NW partner! (Is that just a simple coincidence?!)

This brand new airline is called AIR ITALICA and is said to be targeting Sarajevo, Pristina, Sofia, Zagreb, Timisoara, Bucharest.It is understood that the airline is contemplating a fleet of CRJ 700 and that initially will start flying …Pescara-Milan route.

So while Oneworld faces internal unrest and perhaps a lot of incertitude the Wings are well underway and focused on carrying out quietly their new long-term business plan.

Skyteam on the other hand is holding talks with Swiss. Iberia is clearly unhappy with the way things are progressing inside the Oneworld and is looking over the fence as well. BA is restructuring its business- wonder if June 2002 it's not a little to late... So we have more than clear indications that the "world alliances soup" is simmering again but is far from being cooked!!!

User currently offlineTraveler_7 From Estonia, joined May 2000, 542 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (14 years 9 hours ago) and read 2460 times:

Is it possible for LOT to stay out of alliances? Or at least out of ONEWORLD and STAR?

User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (14 years 9 hours ago) and read 2464 times:

Just to say that Volare moved from MXP to LIN 50% of its domestic flights since spring 2001.
Also from next week Volare will reduce domestic flights by 20%.
I don't think you can call Volare as "a strong partner for KLM in South-Europe".

User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 8444 posts, RR: 57
Reply 20, posted (14 years 5 hours ago) and read 2444 times:

In the days before the QF agreement took place Swissair was a member of the Atlantic Excellence grouping alongside DL.

DL and Swissair match each other quite well, and would still be good partners.

The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineDaV From Italy, joined Jun 2001, 669 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (14 years 1 hour ago) and read 2425 times:

About Volare/KLM debacle:
Volare is surely in a stronger situation than ever before, but just because they moved main scheduled operations from MXP to LIN. MXP is simply too far to be attractive for businessman heading from/to Milan who needs fast connections and nearness to the city. LIN can't handle big aircraft nor cannot be expanded (rwys, new bigger terminals, etc) due to its positioning, close to the city but also sorrounded by houses and MORE IMPORTANT by the Idroscalo, the '20 waterport for idros wich today is our "sea". MXP was needed due to the pressure for interncontinental connection (especially with North America), and during the '80 Alitalia sought after it a major possibility to develop a strong intercontinental and profitable network (remember that the big part of intercont flights to FCO are full of tourist from Asia and N America who hardly fill business/first class seats). MXP proved to be uncomfortable for both passenger and airlines (45 minutes away while LIN is only 15' from downtown, and situation is worst for people who lives in the eastern zone of Milan and nearby towns), even if its quite simple to go through the inside (only 1 terminal for scheduled flights simplify everything, and the layout is almost OK) and it's not that crap everyone who's not been there believe. But money are more important for airlines than anything else, so Volare moved to LIN because they mainly serve Italian routes, for wich having a close-to-the-city airport is more suited than a 45km-away hub (from LIN with 1 you can get to downtown, while from MXP you need about 7). But LIN has been banned to serve connection routes towards internation hubs (FRA, AMS, CDG, LHR and so on) to keep MXP free of a deadly concurrent (many prefer actually to fly with LH, KL, AF from LIN and get to other hub rather than go till MXP and fly AZ). The moral? Volare is satisfied of LIN operations and hardly will change to an all-MXP service to feed for KLM or someone else, when other airlines can caught up the vacuum they left in LIN. If they'll have the possibility to offer feeder routes from LIN they'll be happy to do that, otherwise I think they'll leave things the way they are, and KLM will seek for other partners. If they decide to turn ops to MXP, well, best of luck, they'll remain anyway my fav Italian carrier. Anyway seems that KLM has almost the deal...

Just my thought, and sorry if I went a bit off-topic



Two monologues do not make a dialogue
User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 948 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (13 years 12 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2395 times:

DaV thanks for the latest info from Milan! Well… given the existent setup and local regulations, it appears that the easiest fix for KLM would be to move its operations from Malpensa to Linate, et voila...
I bet Swiss would love Skyteam's tranquility right now...but of course they are not anymore what they use to be...
The BA/AA Alliance application with USDOT has been pulled out today and the two airlines will continue to work together just as "marketing partners". Looks like Oneworld members will meet next week in order to assess their past performance and future direction. Anything is possible here…hopefully every member has its own "plan B"(Iberia is got one…)

User currently offlineDaV From Italy, joined Jun 2001, 669 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (13 years 12 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2374 times:

Connector4you, it's not that simple moving from MXP to LIN: there's an Italian law, the Bersani Act, wich bans airlines to plant feeder routes from LIN to European hubs, except the "shuttle" LIN-FCO; that's why European airlines hates Malpensa: if it's law to go anyway to MXP, take Alitalia and don't waste time (at least was the intention...). If you see the timetable of any European airlines, you'll see the flight to/from LIN are usually limited to 3/4 per day. Before this decree, LIN+MXP counted +/- 15milion pax per year, last data (dec 2001) talks of 25mil pax per year, many of them are caught by AZ in Malpensa.

For the rest of the post, I think that Swiss will go for Oneworld (or what will be left of them Big grin) and not for SkyTeam, too competition with MXP wich is too near, while LOT will go for LH. And qualiflyer won't last more than some months...



Two monologues do not make a dialogue
User currently offlineSdate747 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 272 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (13 years 12 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2335 times:

This alliance was not really that great to begin with. To be successful an alliance needs to be truly global.
The member airlines in Qualiflyer were mostly European and Eastern European with only a select few offering truly global service. When Swissair came tumbling down
( the enron comparable to the European economy) this alliance was doomed.

I think Star Alliance is the best. Their lounges are amazing, their systemwide integration is superb. Go to ORD, FRA, SIN and you will see what I am talking about.

Also .... What alliance is JAL in?

25 DaV : If I'm not wrong, JAL shouldn't be in none of the current alliance... I hope they enter SkyTeam! Rgds DaV
26 Vtual : And where will go our miles ? We have 80.000+ miles on our QualiFlyer card, and we've better to use them the fastest as possible ! -- Vincent
27 DeltAirlines : I think that there is a good chance that Swiss would go into SkyTeam. It seems that they are the most stable of the alliances out there (I think AF ma
28 Connector4you : It should be clear by now to everyone that "low-cost piranhas" are here to stay and take more and more away from "full-service big hungry sharks" on p
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
9W - Time For A New Livery...? posted Mon Dec 19 2005 17:53:44 by Gr8Circle
Time For New UA Music! posted Mon Dec 19 2005 16:28:17 by Dc10s4ever
AA: Time For A New Paint Scheme? posted Tue Aug 23 2005 17:15:33 by QuestAir
When Is It Time For A 732 To Retire? posted Sun Aug 7 2005 02:21:22 by Fpofllflyboi
Time For New Control Tower At BHX? posted Thu Feb 17 2005 01:15:04 by BALandorLivery
Qantas - Time For A New Theme Song? posted Tue Jul 1 2003 06:59:37 by Bd1959
Airlines Realize It's Time For A New Flight Plan posted Mon Dec 9 2002 16:05:42 by 762er
LUFTHANSA, Is It Ready For New Low Cost Carriers? posted Mon Oct 14 2002 10:38:18 by Keesje
AA- Time For New Colors? posted Thu Nov 23 2000 16:48:23 by Bigo747
Is It Time For The 757NG And 767NG? posted Sat Feb 19 2000 13:55:29 by Jet Setter