Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Korean Air That Was Downed  
User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1432 times:

Why was a korean 747 shot down over siberia a few decades ago? Did the russians see a commercial airliner with pax as a threat or was it because they just didn't like them?


Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1326 times:

The Korean Air flight wasn't supposed to go over Sibera, but did to save time. There were two Soviet fighters that questioned the plane if it was a friend or foe. The 747 did not answer and it was shot down. The plane was unknown to the fighters and they wasn't sure what it was.


Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1313 times:

Where was that flight going? Comming to the US? Don't most aircraft fly over russia on their way to asia?


Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offline747buff From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 742 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1307 times:

This happened at the height of the Cold War in the early 80s. Korean #007 had taken off from New York JFK, headed for Seoul, on August 31, 1983. On board were 269 people, including a U.S. Congressman from Georgia. The flight stopped to refuel at Anchorage shortly before dawn on September 1. 10 minutes after leaving ANC, the aircraft began a course that would take it over forbidden airspace of Siberia. Korean Air's flights out of ANC often did this to reduce flight time. A Russian fighter pilot later spotted the 747 and signaled the IFF (identification friend or foe) code to the pilot. When he received no answer, he fired two missiles, one of which struck the aircraft. The pilot radioed a distress call to Tokyo air traffic controllers, reporting cabin decompression and that he was beginning a descent.
Approximately 15 minutes later, the aircraft disappeared, presumably crashing into the Sea of Japan, with no survivors. (For more on what possibly happened after the crash, please see my other thread on this subject.)



At Eastern, we earn our wings every day!
User currently offlineSquad55 From Canada, joined Nov 2001, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1302 times:

They were also flying with no nav lights on. The Russians thought because of 007 it was a spy plane.

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1288 times:

747Buff - I think you will find the Height of the cold war was about 20 years earlier (though admittedly the Early 80's weren't all that great either).

Squad 55 - The Russians thought because of 007 it was a spy plane. lol!!!

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1270 times:

There was a USAF RC-135 Rivet Joint in the area at the time, the Soviets said they thought KL007 was it.

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1263 times:

Put it this way, the yanks had a great deal to do with this but we will never know the truth.

User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1251 times:

There was recently a history of that in one of major Lithuanian magazines (8 pages), "World Disasters" section (also short interview with Soviet general, who ordered to shoot down plane). So, I have to correct everything:

-Korean plane wasn't cutting flight time. Pilot forgot to turn on some system (GPS I believe) and plane didn't followed the predefined course, instead, he taken shortest course from Anchoridge to Seul.
-Plane flew with nav lights on. The pilots first didn't shot down plane because of that (they though it may be An124 I believe). However, when plane didn't responded for half an hour and Soviet civil flights control (twice asked) answered that there should be no civil flights in region, general ordered to shoot down the plane.
-747 was in Japanese frequency, because they had to flew over Japan at a time.
-One 747 a year ago also was ordered to land by Soviets, but they somehow heard that (or just seen fighters on tale) and landed on iced lake in Syberia.
-USA is also responsible for the incident, because 747 flew over US base and US pilots definately seen it. USA didn't told that to 747 because they wanted to see, how Soviets will react, etc. Such trying was important in cold war. Also, later they could use the shot down flight as propaganda.
-Soviet General who ordered to shot down plane said, that he would do the same now if the same reasons would arise. I believe he still works in military.
-After missile aircraft remained airporn for few minutes, but it only could take-off (nose up), not land (because of damaged hydraulic by the heat-reacting missile). It reached height limit and exploded.
-There is a movie made about this tragedy
-This was not the only shot down plane. US ship also shot down Iran Air A300, Ukrainians shot down Syberia Tu-154, some people believe that TWA 747 back in 1994 was also shot down.


User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1225 times:

Sonic - some of your points need some clarification:

- It wasn't GPS, it was INS. This is Inertial Navigation System, which works on accelerometers, and is used to navigate close to the poles. If it is not calibrated correctly from startup, it will give false readings.

- It was a 707 that was forced to land in a lake in Siberia. It wasn't the year before, but over 5 years, on April 20 1978. It was on a flight from Paris. A Japanese and a South Korean were killed when the fighter straffed the aircraft, and 13 others were wounded.

- The 747 didn't climb and explode after the missile hit, it lost altitude until it disapeared of radar and crashed.

- TWA800 Crashed in 1996, not 1994.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineHoffa From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1217 times:

Put it this way, the yanks had a great deal to do with this but we will never know the truth.

Translation: I'd like to accuse America here but I don't really have any thing to back up my nonsense so I'll just make a really vague sounding post.

I'd ask you to elaborate, but its clear you have no idea what you're talking about.


User currently offlineHoffa From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1214 times:

USA is also responsible for the incident, because 747 flew over US base and US pilots definately seen it. USA didn't told that to 747 because they wanted to see, how Soviets will react, etc. Such trying was important in cold war. Also, later they could use the shot down flight as propaganda.

Do you have any proof of this? How about a link?


User currently offline764er From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

Sonic and Hkgspotter1. You guys are hilarious.

As a reasonable person, it is quite obvious who is responsible for this. Not the US (as some of you love to blame for EVERYTHING  Insane ), not the pilot, not the Japan radar operators... Let's give credit where credit is due and not try to spin everything against a country you don't like. HOW ABOUT BLAMING THE SOVIETS? After all, they were the ones who shot the plane down. But it's so easy to overlook that when you're blind.  Insane


User currently offlineSixStarAnsett From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1184 times:

Possible the airspace rules will be somewhat the same as the ones that applied to #007, but, just out of interest, are the rules for overflying North Korea?

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1115 times:

764er - I wouldnt be so quick to take some of those things out of the equation. Of course, the Soviet Air Force has to take main responsibility for the fact it shot down a comercial airliner which obviously shows that a positive visual identification was not made. However, there are other things that come into question. If the pilot had have operated the INS correctly or followed the correct path or whatever it was that he did wrong that caused the aircraft to end up in a dangerous spot, the accident would most likely have neer happened. If the traffic controlers had have realised what was going on (which I don't believe they did at the time), then they could have warned the crew. Which raises the question of how closely a control centre should be following a transiting aircraft. IF (and this is a very big IF) the Americans had have been using KE007 as a baiting operation, how was it that this was allowed to happen.

Its very easy to lay blame in an accident, but laying blame isn't the most important thing. The most important thing is correctly identifying what usually are a raft of failures and breakdowns that led to the accident, and remedying them so it wont happen again. We won't make aviation any safer by pointing fingers, and making a scapegoat of one thing. This may appeal to viewers of CNN or BBC who want everything to fit into neat 5 minute articles, but the nuts and bolts of it is we will only make it safer by looking at the whole picture, and identifying and fixing all the problems. This may be complex, and time consuming, but it is necessary.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1105 times:


Hi!

For me all that was said here is relevant, my only problem is why they have to use inocent people to work diferent purposes? Tomorrow you are in a civil airliner flying from airport A to airport B and suddenly you're hit by a missile or something deadly like that, it's not fare! Remember the ITAVIA DC-9? Yes it was hit by a missile, anyone assume the guilty on that too? The Iran Air A300?
Regards


User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 31
Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1086 times:

CV990,

It's cruel, but that's life. There were many examples in history, where innocent people were misused. Add to your list the WTC attacks, or any hijacking, or many other examples.

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1083 times:

It is belived that Rivit Joint was operating up near Petroplavesk(spl?) at the time of the shoot down...

Several hundred miles north of the sea of Japan.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1062 times:

764er

The Soviets should be held responsible? But was it not the South Koreans who entered Soviet airspace illegally. If the crew knew they were acting illegally, which they would have known via onboard equipment, they have knowingly put the lives of their passengers in danger.

The Soviets are responsible for shooting down the aircraft in the sense that it was their fighters who shot it down, but they can not be blamed for the lunacy of the crew on that flight.

Also, someone mentioned the Iran Air A300 which was shot down by the USS Vincennes in 1988. KAL007 and IR655 can not be compared, as each was a unique incident with varying degrees of facts which led to the result of an aircraft being shot down.


User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2732 posts, RR: 8
Reply 19, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1065 times:

DPRK airspace was cleared (amongst great hoopla in this part of the world) for KE, Korea to Nth America/Nth Japan flights in 1998 or so.

Have been on many of those flights and they don't fly over DPRK so don't know what happened about it all.



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1050 times:

Hoffa, as I said, I read about this crash in Lithuanian magazine and I written what I read... I don't know any sites about it in the net, but you may search and I believe you'd find.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
? About Iran Air A300 That Was Shot Down.... posted Wed Dec 15 2004 03:45:02 by Pilotaydin
Korean Air Interview's Minor Excerpt posted Wed Dec 13 2006 19:17:38 by Jimyvr
Korean Air's Economy Product posted Wed Dec 6 2006 10:28:35 by Bimmerkid19
Korean Air/nwa Northwest Expands Codeshare Flight posted Tue Dec 5 2006 17:26:07 by Jimyvr
Korean Air 744 At MSP Due To Blizzards posted Sat Dec 2 2006 00:13:42 by Af773atmsp
GE Engine Orders From Korean Air posted Wed Nov 22 2006 18:15:13 by Justloveplanes
It Looks Like It's Goodbye To Korean Air's Pas 747 posted Wed Nov 22 2006 15:47:45 by KE086
Korean Air Order 25 Boeings posted Tue Nov 21 2006 03:12:57 by PanAm_DC10
Korean Air Next Week DFW/ICN, New Cabin? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 02:34:45 by MaverickM11
Korean Air Announces 2 Year A380 Delay To 2010 posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:01:32 by Singapore_Air