Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Future Of BA NCL-LHR And NCL-LGW  
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2104 times:

I have noticed that recently BA have reverted back to the 6 Daily frequency of the summer. With Go having started NCL-STN flights (and doing brilliantly), this is bound to have an effect on BA pax to LHR AND LGW, so what do you think the future holds for NCL-LHR and NCL-LGW???
Will freq remain the same? Will the routes be dropped and be taken over??? What do you think?


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGive it a GO From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2042 times:

Well, it's also worth remembering that the STN-NCL rotation isn't new. Before Go started operating it, Gill did.

User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 2014 times:

Yup, but Go are using 3 a day 148 seat 737-300s on the route, instead of the 3 70 seat ATR72s. And with the news about BA axing lots more staff and 10 more routes, will NCL be one of these???
I guess it wont because it is a good performing route, with services now 4 757s, an A319 and a 734 a day on the LHR route, and LGW-NCL 4 RJ100s and a 733.



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineEg777er From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 1836 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 18 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

I think NCL-LHR's future is assured - in the 18 months since I have started regularly flying the route the equipment has grown from A319s mostly to 757s mostly.

I have yet to go on a service that is less than 75% full - at any time of day or week.

Gatwick - haven't flown it as much but loads seem to average about 50% whether you're on the RJ or the 737.

I wouldn't count them out yet - BA have a lot of connecting pax on the route and with the continued mess on the Railways, they wouldn't be as stupid as to give it up.


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 17 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

Oh, wouldn't they?

The NCL-LGW route is a heavy lossmaker, and if BA continue their withdrawal from both transatlantic and European flights from LGW, then the rationale behind retaining domestics starts to look a bit thin. After all, feed traffic was the justification behind continuing with lossmaking routes such as this.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineBilly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2000, 895 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 17 hours ago) and read 1972 times:

Note that BA is shifting a load of ARJ's to MAN and BHX. If NCL struggles to fill the LGW service (especially with some decent yield) then they either chop it. I have also heard that the rotue might become part of the new pricing initiative at LGW. Lower, but not low cost.

But then who knows at the moment.


User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 16 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

So NCL-LHR should/will be safe but NCL-LGW...Uncertain future....
Bring back the ATRs! Big grin



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 16 hours ago) and read 1952 times:

Billy, the RJ's were on Newcastle before as they were part of the CityFlyer fleet. Now that the EOG and CFE fleets have merged, they can be redeployed elsewhere on the BA network.

I have to laugh at your comment about the new pricing initiative at LGW though. I mean, here's an idea: how about using a subsidiary's low cost base at LGW to make the routes profitable. Oh, I forgot, they had one of those in the shape of CityFlyer, and they shut it down. The idiots behind that idea should be sacked.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineBilly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2000, 895 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 16 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

They also had a low cost airline. BA has a knack of discovering things then dumping them.

Will there be enough RJ's left at LGW to operate NCL, amongst otheres was my question. Especially as A319s and 735s from BHX and MAN are being sent to LGW.


User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 16 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

Question is, if BA Gatwick dump NCL, will easyJet take over or will Go increase freq to NCL from STN?! Or could the LHR route go all 757?!


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineBilly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2000, 895 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

Just read that all 16 ARJs to be transferred to MAN/BHX. All ATRs are to be retired. The short and long haul cuts are at LGW but no clues as to the routes to go yet.

Interestingly, the MANX brand will die and will be rolled into BA CitiExpress.


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (12 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Where did you hear that from, Billy?


She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (12 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1933 times:

Damn, thats a near certainty that NCL-LGW will be cut I think. I dont think NCL-LGW could survive on 737s, well not at current frequency anyway. (maybe 2-3 daily)


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineBilly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2000, 895 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (12 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

Air Transport Intelligence

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 14, posted (12 years 5 months 15 hours ago) and read 1917 times:

I've always wondered what the City's reaction would be if the so called expert brokers really knew anything about aviation.

Some of the decisions BA make...well. Every time they announce a new strategy which will deliver £X million cost savings it has the opposite effect, and everyone in the airline industry knows it.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24899 posts, RR: 56
Reply 15, posted (12 years 5 months 14 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

 Sad


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future Of BA @ LGW If Open Skies Goes Ahead? posted Wed Oct 26 2005 02:10:07 by Englandair
The Future Of BA Connect posted Mon Jun 26 2006 20:58:55 by Sam1987
Future Of BA Under Walsh posted Wed Mar 9 2005 07:41:37 by Scotron11
Future Of Service Between Brussels And Asia posted Wed Nov 10 2004 10:54:41 by BrightCedars
The Future Of The A340-500 And 777-200LR posted Fri May 18 2001 15:30:51 by Godbless
Future Of BA's Fleet posted Fri Oct 13 2000 06:36:19 by Mr.BA
The Future Of NCL Airport? posted Wed Mar 9 2005 12:34:42 by Ready4Pushback
What To Expect- BA SFO-LHR, FD LHR-NCL? posted Fri Jul 12 2002 16:30:17 by Tripleseven
BA Or Virgin And LGW Or Lhr? posted Tue May 28 2002 23:26:29 by Alitalia777
Regional Airlines RFPs And The Future Of Them posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:39:34 by Apodino