Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Was Wrong With The 747-300?  
User currently offlineAirplanetire From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1809 posts, RR: 2
Posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

What was wrong with the 747-300? I believe only 80 some were made adn that's not very many. What didn't airlines like about it?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2645 times:

The -300 was followed almost immediately(in aircraft years) by the -400. I don't have the numbers, but I would imagine that the capabilities of the -400 far outweighed the additional cost.

I do know that TWA tried to replace it's -100's and -200's with ex-Saudia -300's and couldn't because the upper deck emergency exits did not conform to FAA requirements. Shame, 1996(the last year TWA really had a chance) might have gone very differently.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16307 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

The 743 entered service in 1983 while the 744 entered service in 1990.....so the 7-year gap was significant. The 743 was not immediately superceded by the 744.

The 742 was well-established & airlines found it easier to keep adding the 742 to their fleet than stepping up to the 743. The 743 also had less range than the 742.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineBacardi182 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2566 times:

the -300 also had a 3 man crew instead of the -400's 2 man flight crew.

User currently offlineAamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1061 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2552 times:

It was mainly down to the fact the -300 was way off the range of the -200, i trhink about 1000nm with a full load, and that made it a little more expensive over longer routes.
The fact that a more advanced version was in the works, BA did consider 300s, but was told by boeing one year that a more advanced one was on the way, so they waited. im not sure about other airlines and why they didnt commit, if they did or didnt hear that news.


User currently onlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1385 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2518 times:

Yyz actually the 744 entered service in 1989 with NWA airlines.


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1995 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2494 times:

On its own, the 743 isn't a bad aircraft. However, it doesn't always compare favorably with its predecessor (the 742) or its successor (the 744).

The 743's range is inferior to that of the 742, a problem for airlines operating the aircraft on very long-haul routes. The 743 is less well suited for carrying cargo because of the additional lower ceiling behind the forward hump (as compared to the 742). That's why dedicated 744 freighters have the 742's short hump.

The 744's advanced-technology engines offer much better fuel economy over those on the 742, which adds to a lot of fuel on a long flight. The 744's two-crew cockpit's advantages over the three-crew examples found on the classics are self-evident.



The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2433 times:

Wonder if anyone could help me here too. Are the landing gears on the B743 exactly the same as the B744 or are the 44s' are strengthened? And the fuselage, are they the same?

thanks very much.



Boeing747 万岁!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Went Wrong With The 747-300? posted Thu Apr 13 2000 07:30:04 by 747-600X
What Was Wrong With The A342? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 03:11:55 by YULWinterSkies
What Was Wrong With DL 116? posted Mon Sep 4 2006 09:41:11 by JMO-777
What Went Wrong With The Unducted Fan Engine? posted Mon Jan 16 2006 22:24:47 by 1337Delta764
What Went Wrong With The Engine Markings? posted Mon May 31 2004 04:26:37 by Arcano
CN-235: What Was Wrong With It? posted Thu Apr 22 2004 07:07:22 by LVZXV
What Is Wrong With The SQ Website posted Wed Apr 3 2002 11:47:12 by Ryanb741
PIA Back In BHX With The 747-300? posted Wed Dec 26 2001 13:37:41 by Airmale
What Is Wrong With The MD11? posted Wed Jul 11 2001 22:24:23 by SK A340
What Is Wrong With The 767 posted Sun Apr 22 2001 22:40:55 by Critter592