CX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4385 posts, RR: 5 Posted (13 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 842 times:
I was looking at how Air France's load factors across the atlantic have really increased. They have redeployed several 747-400s to the Atlantic pond. They definately need capacity. They seem to be a launch customer for the 777-300X could they also purchase some 747-400Xs when they are launched possibly this fiscal quarter?
"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
AFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 28 Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 732 times:
Yes, AF is very likely to become the launch customer of the 777-300X.
Anyway, they'll order a sizeable fleet of 777 in the coming years.
But, no they won't order the 747-400X. Their aim is to phase the 747-200 out. The aircrafts operating on leisure routes (Antilla, Indian Ocean), which have a special layout, will be replaced by the 747-400.
The 747-400 will be replaced on the "main" network by the 777-300X, and 777-200ER.
AF said it won't order the A3XX neither. They want to play the fragmentation as much as possible.
Why do they operate more 747-400 on Atlantic so ? It's because you need less a/c to operate a daily flight on that market, than you need to operate on Asia (routes are shorter, and the a/c can come back to CDG the same day).
That way they make 747-400 available for convertion into full passenger configuration. All 744 registred with a "S" is a combi (the other were 100% pax from the beginning).
That conversion is made in the view of operating the 744 on leisure routes which don't need such a cargo capacity.
BTW, the undiscloed order for 2 GE-powered 777-200ER is very likely to be for AF.
The 777 is reported to be very reliable and to please to AF operating staff, crews and customers. So they'll make to 777 their main a/c for long haul ops.
They should be one of the launch customer of the 777F as well.
Wingman From Trinidad and Tobago, joined May 1999, 1836 posts, RR: 5 Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 719 times:
I think if AF orders the 777X as the launch customer, they would then seal the GE exclusivity deal with Boeing. Isn't there a "time limit" to secure the first orders before the deal becomes void. I sincerely hope for Boeing's sake that AF holds off and RR is allowed back in the game. And P&W for that matter. To me it seems that airlines are negotiating prices with Boeing and engine manufacturers separately whenever a plane has a choice of engines. Thus, I just don't understand why Boeing made this decision. The burden of development and profit-making appears to rest squarely on the shoulders of the engine builders. The 340 will kill them if they go with GE alone.
TWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3048 posts, RR: 4 Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 690 times:
I do not know about the load increase. Two years ago, Air France used to fly two daily CDG-ORD-CDG flights, one with a 747-400, and the other an A340-300. Now they decreased it to two daily 767-300ER flights. That seems like a decrease to me.
life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
Johnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2469 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 685 times:
I really think that Air France is strongly marketing CDG airport as THE European transit airport. Therefore they seem to be increasing capacity in key markets and coordinating incoming and outbound flights to Europe, Africa, etc.
The sad reality is that French workers seem to be capitalizing on this by creating work stoppages that disrupt CDG's flight operations. Why would anyone want to transit CDG when there's even a small chance that their flight plans will go awry? There's plenty of other airports where workers don't seem to revel in disrupting everyday operations......sorry to have to say that, because I think CDG is a fabulous airport with great potential.
AFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 28 Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 678 times:
I think,you're wrong TWA : until last summer AF operated one daily flight. First with an A343, then a moment with a 777.
Last summer they upgraded to two daily flights with 763ER, then this winter one daily 763ER and a daily A343.
This summer they'll operate two daily A343.
If you don't call that growth...
BTW, the workers usually work every day, like anywhere in the world. They don't go on strike more than in ORD, or LAX.
That's a legend I think...
This certainly makes a lot of sense from a commonality point of view. I'm assuming, of course, that the 735 will be replaced by the A318/319, but being a relatively new type, they probably won't be in too much of a hurry to get rid of it.
Finally, a340-300, what are Air France flight crews like? Are they fairly decent about cockpit visits and jump seats? I've only ever flown AF once, from LHR - CDG on an A310 (GEMF), back in 1992, and was allowed up front, but never got to ask about the j/s. By all accounts it has got its act together, and I'd certainly like to fly with them again.