HlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1501 times:
In terms of population probably Nashville, San Diego or San Antonio. All three cities have populations over 1,000,000. All three have strong Southwest presence, but not really a hub.
Nashville could be a great hub again since AA pulled out and Southwest increased their presence. Nashville has 4 runways, three of them parallel. A modern terminal complex that is less than 15 years old.
What about Orlando, Boston or Tampa too?
Air Tran no longer has a hub at Orlando. Delta would be the closest thing to a hub, if you count the Comair hub there, but I assume you are talking about majors.
Does Boston really have a hub? I have seen a lot of USAirways aircraft there, and American Airlines has a strong presence, but they aren't really listed as hubs for Boston.
What about Tampa? SW is strong there, but I don't think it is a hub.
You mentioned INDY, but ATA is considered a major and as far as I know they still have somewhat of a hub there even though most of it moved to Midway.
Watewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1358 times:
When you refer to the size of a city, are you looking at metro figures or city limits figures? If it's strictly city population you're looking at, Boston is definitely not the biggest. It only has 600,000+ people or so.
Hurricane From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1444 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1356 times:
Seattle has Alaska Air, and I think Delta has Portland as a hub (may be a focus city, or I might be wrong and they have nothing)...Dont forget Hartford. Once again, I could be wrong, but doesn't the Hartford area have something like 1.5 Million people?
Sllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1341 times:
Silly question: what (other than an airline's say-so) determines what a 'hub' is?
The example I have in mind is Southwest at MCI. While it's not officially a 'hub,' it *is* used extensively for people changing planes coming in on non-stops from either coast. Based on my observation, a whole lot more people pass through MCI than have their final destination there.
JetBlueRules From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1328 times:
Noise: Seattle has Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air and Portland has Delta.
FATFlyer: San Diego is ranked #7, not 17 by the 2000 Census.
OTHER LARGE CITIES WITHOUT HUBS:
9. San Antonio, TX 1,144,646
11. San Jose, CA 894,943
14. Jacksonville, FL 735,617
16. Austin, TX 656,562
22. Nashville, TN 569,891
23. El Paso, TX 563,662
29. Oklahoma City, OK 506,132
(This is as far as I am going to go....)
SMALLEST HUB CITY:
65. Anchorage, AK (Alaska Airlines) 260,283
LARGE METRO AREAS WITHOUT HUBS:
San Diego, CA 2,813,833
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 2,395,997
Sacramento-Yolo, CA 1,796,857
Afitch7881 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 816 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1149 times:
"Once again, I could be wrong, but doesn't the Hartford area have something like 1.5 Million people?"
Hartford as a city is only around 130,000 people, actually a bit smaller since the 2000 stats came out. As a Metro area, Hartford is rather large with a population of over 1.6 million people and this doesnt include lots of areas the airport draws from.
Bradley International which serves Hartford is said to serve between 2-3.5 million people in the service area which is quite large.
Travatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2174 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1111 times:
Airlines always look to the population of the METRO area, not the city population. Look at the VERY sizeable hubs Delta and AirTran (and formerly Eastern) have in Atlanta. The population of the CITY OF ATLANTA is only 416,000 people (of which I'm one). However - in the metro area, there are over 4.1 MILLION people.
DeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8916 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1110 times:
Currently, BOS does not have a hub airline, but three airlines with very close market share: Delta, US Airways, and American. However, Delta is building a new terminal at BOS with 25 gates with service to MXP, CDG, LGW (all exist currently thru mainline or code share), FCO, MAN, DUB, and FRA, as well as additional transcon (SAN, SFO, maybe SEA) and more connection service, which would make BOS a hub (of sorts, similar to AA's SJC) for Delta.
Scottb From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6868 posts, RR: 32
Reply 22, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1088 times:
While Delta, US Airways, and American all have good-sized focus cities at BOS, no one really has a hub in Boston. There are generally very limited connecting opportunities to Northern New England and Atlantic Canada, or Cape Cod, for the most part on turboprops or small (i.e. 328JET/ERJ-135 sized) regional jets. While the population of the city of Boston is indeed surprisingly small at 600,000 (owing in large part to the division of the area into smaller towns and cities), the metropolitan area is the seventh-largest in the U.S. at 5.8 million people. The prime reason for Boston not having a hub is geography; there are very few city-pairs for which a connection in Boston makes sense. You might connect in Boston when flying ATL-YUL, but you certainly wouldn't when flying ATL-PHL. Secondarily, the airport infrastructure at Logan really couldn't handle a large hub operation, given the intersecting runways and frequent bad weather in Boston. The fact that strong northwest winds shut down all but one of Logan's runways would wreak havoc with hub scheduling.
San Diego is the next-largest metro area lacking a hub, and the reasons are similar: geographic unsuitability, lack of terminal gates, and an airfield with a single air carrier runway. Below that, Tampa (former USAir focus city, but low-yield and poor geography), Portland (small Alaska hub and former Delta Pacific gateway with poor geography), Sacramento, Kansas City (Vanguard hub, former Braniff/Eastern hub, USAir mini-hub, large Southwest city), Indianapolis, San Antonio, etc.
Cities on the East and West Coasts generally make for poor hubs unless they have very large populations which will support substantial international service and O&D traffic demand. It's tough to make a hub of any size work in a metro area with a population under 2 million.
Northwest's hub at MEM is small and relies on much more regional flying than most other hubs; daily mainline departures at MEM stand at just 103. Of those, 62 are on DC-9's -- not much larger than a large RJ. The hub at Memphis is helped by its age; it was started in the 1970's by Southern, which became part of Republic, which was merged into Northwest.
SLC works as well as it does (with just over 1.3 million in population) for a number of reasons. It's one of only two reasonably suitable interior West cities (DEN is obviously the other) and is geographically isolated (so driving is less of an option). SkyWest's strength as a regional partner also helps Delta at SLC.
The failure of both American and Midway to establish RDU as a hub speaks to its suitability; the population base is marginal for a hub and it sits in the shadow of larger hubs at ATL, CLT, and IAD. BNA failed for American, though Southwest has made it work as a large focus city by offering low fares. GSO, however, didn't work as Continental Lite's hub.
Hurricane From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1444 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1056 times:
"The failure of both American and Midway to establish RDU as a hub speaks to its suitability"
That is true, Scottb, but Midway and American decided to come to RDU for the Research Triangle Park (Center to many companies, industries), not because of the mainline population or location. Midway was flourishing and growing with all of the business travellers until the economy got bad (horrible.) The RTP suffered greatly because of this, thus Midway's primary customers didn't travel. Midway went bankrupt not because of RDU's bad location and population, but because of bad economy.
25 Travelin man
: The last I heard in the LA Times, United was planning on closing LAX as an official "hub". The number of flights they've slashed from the airport woul
: Padcrasher- The high growth rates in Las Vegas and Phoenix have indeed helped America West; however, PHX and LAS are also Southwest's two largest citi
: I really wouldn't call CLT a small hub for USAir...last year it was their largest in terms of passengers carried, but then again, USAir isn't huge in