Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
777-100X Revived To Counter A330 At SQ  
User currently offlinePandora From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (16 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

Remember the 777-100X???

Well, Boeing have introduced it again to Singpaore Airlines to counter the a possible order forr A330s!!

My bet will go to Boeing, since there will be no commonality with the entire SQ fleet once the A340-300 goes, but then, after a few years time, the A340-500 joins the fleet, so i see the A330 and 7771X, two competiting types are equally attrative.

but anyone has any general data on the 777-100X???

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1556 times:

Visit My site in a few days,


User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

Do you guys think Boeing is getting a little bit confused here, competition have wierd effects I guess: the 771 is supposed to carry 250 passengers....what was than the point of producing the B767-400???? Boeing is litterally going to create competition in itself. The A330-200 is perfect for SQ's need, it gives a slight capacity increase over the A310s, creates communality with the A340-300 whose pilots can easily switch to the type and tides well with the upcoming A345. I have the impression that the 771 will be a little heavy for its purpose and thus prove to be uneconomical.

User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1536 times:

But the A330 doesn't have 4 engines does it?? The 777-100 has two engines slightly underrated from the -200, but also has two emergency engines in the rear that take the place of an APU. These pop out of the fuselage when ordered and can create up to 15,000 lbs or thrust. SQ hasn't liked the A-340 and recent problems with the A-340-500 & -600 development are likely to push the delivery date back.

User currently offlineAirbus A3XX From Australia, joined May 1999, 510 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1534 times:

But about the fleet communality, do you remember that SQ had got orders for 77 777 aircrafts? That's is even more common!

User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1532 times:

It's not really competing with itself, as both aircraft are designed for different purposes. The 777-X has an ENORMOUSLY long range, while the 767-400 can fly 10-11 hr. flights, and that's the max.

To put it into perspective: Boeing makes the 757-200 seating 188 pax. Boeing also makes the MD-11C which also seats 188 pax.--there's no competition there...


User currently offlineRavi From Singapore, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1527 times:

The B771X has "two emergency engines that take the place of the APU"...

Fot the wuck?

GoA340 is (almost) right - the B771X is too heavy for an A310 replacement, but obviously SIA doesn't just want an A310 replacement - it wants to fly the airplane on long intercontinental routes.

The A330-200 also isn't the perfect airplane for SIA. If it was the airline would have ordered it by now. It is not happy with either the A330-200 or B767-400ER. And, the reasons why SIA isn't happy with these two airplanes is probably the same reasons why it won't like the B771X, either, even though the airline has been pushing for this airframe since 1996.

User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (16 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1521 times:

Than there is some confusion here....some of you are right to say that the 771 and 332 are not competing because of their range but I thought SQ was shopping for a A310 replacement. You can bet they wont by the 763 and will only do so if a new 763 is produced by shrinking the 764 and thus getting similar avionics to the 777. I think eventually SQ will buy yhe 332 just because it is the most comfortable 250 seater out thereand the most natural A310 replacement. In any case I think SQ is just behaving as if they are the most precious think in the airline industry. If they dont like the 771 or the 332, that is fine, other people will buy these planes anyway! (AA for example which would love the idea of having frequent 771 flights to ultra long haul destinations.)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Happened To The 777-100X? posted Thu Sep 11 2003 01:50:30 by Lehpron
New NWA A330 At MSP, But How To Catch A Glimpse? posted Sat Jul 12 2003 02:17:15 by Pilottim747
UAL 934 777-200 LAX To Heathrow At MSP? posted Sun May 11 2003 06:44:00 by Mnsourcer
Airbus Looks At Long Term Options To Counter 7E7 posted Thu Mar 13 2003 00:41:59 by AvObserver
Fiji Military To Enforce Plans At 12am - Aviation? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 06:24:06 by Planemanofnz
CO 777 From DEL To EWR posted Thu Nov 23 2006 20:31:13 by Pcolley17
FAA To Delay Actions At FLL posted Tue Nov 21 2006 23:34:58 by KarlB737
Rnwys 31L/R In Use Due To High Winds At DFW posted Wed Nov 15 2006 23:21:47 by N659AA
Converting 777 From Pax To Cargo posted Thu Nov 9 2006 05:30:45 by UAEflyer
Jetstar A330 At MEL (Full Livery) posted Sat Nov 4 2006 01:11:39 by Bakestar