Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Old Topic I Know-Next WN Cities?  
User currently offlineSEA nw DC10 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 491 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2103 times:

What do you all think? Where do you predict WN opening up. They have a record of opening a new station each year. What'll it be?

SEA nw DC10

63 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineThomacf From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 542 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

I don't understand why they haven't started service into CVG and TOL.

User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6287 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

CVG is easy. WN does not attack the other hubs head on. TOL probably doesn't have enough traffic to attract them either. Too close to CLE and PIT I think.

Of course considering their 15% increase in staff, they certainly have something huge in mind. Time will tell.



Damn, this website is getting worse daily.
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1860 times:

They've been talking about COS for the past 2 years...........


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineTravellin'man From United States of America, joined May 2001, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

Portland, Maine...please!!!!


It is not enough to be rude; one must also be incorrect.
User currently offlineRooinc From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 123 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

I am rooting for CLT!!!

--TJ


User currently offlineSkyway1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1822 times:

I would always hear rumors WN was going into MKE, but nobody wanted them, especially Midwest Express. MKE is probably too close to the MDW hub anyway.

Chris


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1818 times:

Telluride, CO Big grin

User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

Given WN's success at ISP, I wouldn't be surprised to see them move into another New York-area airport. ABE and SWF are probably the most likely candidates.


"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5803 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

Unless there is a major implosion of a competitor, I believe WN will continue its current pattern and add regions with a MSA population of roughly 1 to 1.5 million people. I think the short list looks like this:
Milwaukee, Charlotte, Greensboro, Rochester, Grand Rapids, Richmond, Greenville-Spartanburg, Dayton, Fresno, Syracuse.

That's about 3 or 4 years of growth. Others such as COS or ICT will come after that.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

Actually, FATFlyer, it's likely that there will be an implosion of a major competitor in the next two years...US Airways. Their cash and ability to sell and lease back a/c will hold them for at least this year, but US probably won't survive 2003.

The articles about their hiring 4,000 people indicate that they want to put most of these people at BWI, MDW, and OAK. Around OAK, WN already serves most airports in areas of 1-1.5 million people or more; they're probably just beefing up their service and adding semi-transcons to MDW. (Who knows, maybe FAT will get lucky.  Big grin )

So expansion will probably be into cities around MDW and BWI. All the cities you listed sound like reasonable candidates to me. I'm personally praying (and writing letters for) Rochester. Fortunately, we have very assertive local officials who have successfully lured JetBlue and AirTran; maybe WN will be next.

There have been threads to death about NYC airports for WN...I agree with the suggestion above about SWF and/or ABE. TTN's runway is too short and wealthy super-NIMBY's have the county (the airport operator) in their pocket. HPN, similarly, is surrounded by wealthy super-NIMBY's who would go ape at the thought of a low-fare airline bringing hoi polloi and noise into their airport. ABE's more likely, in my view, because it could draw from Philly too.

But as I said, my prayers are for Rochester.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineAfitch7881 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 816 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1752 times:

I believe its going to be ROC. In the last anoucnement of Norfolk, didnt they say Richmond was going to be within the next year or 2?

ABE would be a good choice along with ROC or possibly SYR.


Eric



User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 12, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

Please Please Please!!!

Come to Anchorage.....We can't stand the Alaska Lower 48 Monopoly...IT SUCKS!!!! Pissed



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4113 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1708 times:

sometime in the future Portland, Maine may be added. But right now, PWM is so very seasonal and hardly has a metro area to draw from (like Manchester does). In fact, MHT's served area includes the southern coast of Maine, so that further constrains the market for PWM. Southwest isn't likely to canibalize one station (esp. one as successful as MHT) by setting up shop only 100 miles away at another. With my folks living in Kennebunkport and me living in southern NH, I see the fortunes of both airports. I remember in the mid-1980s when PWM had DL 757s several times a day, People Express 737s to EWR, and all sorts of action. By comparison, Manchester had a few turbo-props a day to LGA and EWR. Now look at both airports...incredible to see the reversals in fortunes.

User currently offlineWoodsboy From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1031 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1698 times:

L-188 is RIGHT ON TARGET!
Anchorage would be a great move for Southwest, I hope someone at WN is reading the forums. Seattle Airlines, err, I mean Alaska Airlines monopoly in Anchorage SUX!!! We would welcome Southwest in Alaska. Maybe even if they did like Reno did, do Anchorage AND Fairbanks. We are absolutely in a strangelhold in Fairbanks with Alaska as our only choice since Delta retreated in November and now only serve Anchorage.

I know most of you out there read this and think- Anchorage?? What the hell?? Does anybody even live in Alaska?? Its okay, we are use to being totally ignored and forgotten not to mention sadly misunderstood!


User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5803 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

DCA-ROC,

US is one but don't forget that UA and AWA are still struggling also. IF, one of them was to implode, I would not be surprised to see a Federal Govt. bailout along the lines of the Chrysler move. The industry is not in a financial position for others to quickly replace the service lost in an implosion. The voter outcry would be hard for Congress to ignore. But that is a discussion for another thread.

Looking at media reports across the country about the 4000 new employees, it appears that there will be 5-10% increases in employees at most existing stations. Some is due to new security changes, but some may be due to additional service in existing cities. Some examples: 9 employees in Birmingham, 10 in Austin.
http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2002/02/18/daily14.html
http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2002/02/18/daily12.html

The articles also mention 250 pilots which someone more familiar with scheduling can tell us how many aircraft that indicates.

I would be surprised to see a bold move against a competitor this year. The only possibility would be ABE. More likely we will a new city we already expect such as RIC.

Like ROC, FAT has been aggressive in pursuing service. The recent media mentions of FAT by CO for future service with the new 145XR, HA for future FAT service to the islands, and F9 for future JetExpress service indicate a lot of growth in the next 2 years. WN is the big fish. With area growth since they closed the FAT Morris Air station in the merger along with taking care of WN's terminal concerns (new expanded parking, new freeway access, 4 new jetway equipped gates, and a major terminal remodel will be complete this summer) I look for WN to add FAT in 2003 or 2004.




"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineMjzair From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 398 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1694 times:

Newburgh (SWF) NEEDS WN in a bad way. Airfares are ridiculous, and there isn't enough service since Midway went bust.

User currently offlineJsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2030 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1692 times:

I for one was very surprised a few years ago when WN added Jackson, Mississippi. I never in a million years expected to see that city on their route map.

With that in mind, I'd say just about any sizeable city on the east coast or in the southeast is fair game. I'd put my money on one of the Redneck Riviera cities on the Gulf of Mexico (either Pensacola, Mobile, or Gulfport/Biloxi) to capture the vacation traffic to those cities.

CLT has the US Airways hub, which seems too entrenched for Southwest. Greensboro seems like a logical choice, although it's fairly close to RDU, and Continental Lite really struggled there back in the mid-90s.

Southwest has also been talking about Wichita, Kansas for years... they've always wanted to add service from Love Field, but the Wright Amendment was always a restriction. Now that the Shelby Amendment has opened up Kansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, I wouldn't be too surprised to see a DAL-ICT route, along with of course of MDW-ICT, STL-ICT, PHX-ICT, and the like.

As soon as the Midway airport expansion is complete I expect Southwest to add quite a few cities from there. Right now they're shoehorned into about 12 or 13 gates, but when the construction is complete they'll have 19. Knowing Southwest, they'll be able to stretch those extra 5 or 6 gates quite a long way.


User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1665 times:



If they wanted to fill a hole in the midwest, CID - Cedar Rapids or MLI - Quad Cities are both far from MDW, STL, MCI, and OMA.

I don't know if these areas have the sort of population numbers WN would look for though.


User currently offlineAeroGlobeAir7 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 586 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1659 times:

ICT services won't happen, not anytime in the next decade. You can bet on it. Even though there is a high demand for SWA's services there, Wichita cannot support a high frequency of flights, which is what Southwest's low fares survive on. There isn't a city in the US that Wichita could support 8 daily flights to, or more, and we all know Southwest would fly to more than one city if they came to ICT, the fares are too high, and Southwest wouldn't instantly make the prices rock bottom. I think it will be some time before Wichita gains Southwest's services.

User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3166 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1652 times:

Worcester
Honolulu



14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
User currently offlineBUFjets From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1638 times:

I read once that WN doesn't like to enter a market unless it can fill at least 5 daily flights. I can't see Western New York supporting this many WN flights from both ROC and BUF.

I've flown them 5 times this year out of BUF and I've never had a full one. On my last flight, the guy next to me was from Rochester. Obviously, people make the easy 50 minute drive from Rochester to Buffalo to fly Southwest. WN uses this same philosophy by serving BWI and not DCA or Dulles. They know most people won't mind driving a few miles to save $.

So just as DCA-ROC guy is hoping for WN in ROC, I'm hoping against it. I'd be worried that in the end, WN might pull out of both ROC and BUF.


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 22, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1613 times:

BUFJets: I read once that WN doesn't like to enter a market unless it can fill at least 5 daily flights. I can't see Western New York supporting this many WN flights from both ROC and BUF.

Jim: WN only enters a market if they can fill 10 flights, actually. Typically they fly most of those to their nearest hub city--like the 7 BUF-BWI--and then a few other point-to-point fligts. I could see Rochester, Buffalo, *and* Syracuse all supporting at least 10 flights. See below.

BUFjets: I've flown them 5 times this year out of BUF and I've never had a full one. On my last flight, the guy next to me was from Rochester. Obviously, people make the easy 50 minute drive from Rochester to Buffalo to fly Southwest. WN uses this same philosophy by serving BWI and not DCA or Dulles. They know most people won't mind driving a few miles to save $.

Jim: Southwest, like other airlines, makes their decisions based upon the traffic potential of a destination. WN said last year they want to go to Richmond despite going to ORF too. ORF and RIC are closer than BUF and ROC, and are similar in size. And don't forget the nearby stations in ALB and BDL.

All the WN flights I've taken from BUF have been full, though none have been since 9-11. People in Rochester will drive to save money if we have to, but I can assure you we don't like it. We had to do it for most of People Express' existence, then PE discovered that ROC and BUF could both support stations. We always get the short end of the stick on airline "ROC vs. BUF" decisions and do get tired of that. ROC is a healthy medium-size market. We're not BGM or WPT.

US Airways is ailing, and since 9-11 ailing fast. Both BUF and ROC have suffered big cuts by the Cartel carriers, much bigger than warranted by demand. ROC was up to 80 percent of pre 9/11 traffic by New Year's, but our capacity has been cut 27 percent. As George Bush Sr. might say, "you've got a gap." AirTran has figured this out as you probably know. They should do well at both ROC and BUf at the same time.

As US ails, I would not be surprised to see Southwest enter both ROC and SYR, and seize traffic. BUF will do just fine, and don't forget BUF has big ol' Southern Ontario/ Toronto to draw from. As long as WestJet doesn't cross the border, BUF has plenty of catchment area. They don't need to poach pax from ROC. WN could easily control 30-40 percent of air traffic in Upstate NY five years from now. And that with AirTran and JetBlue flourishing alongside, due to the airlines' different markets and strategies.

BUFjets: So just as DCA-ROC guy is hoping for WN in ROC, I'm hoping against it. I'd be worried that in the end, WN might pull out of both ROC and BUF.

Jim: Keep an eye on the big picture...it favors big low-fare expansion in Upstate NY over the next few years. There will be plenty of market demand for everyone.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineUALPHLCS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

WN's pattern is to go for underserved airport near large population centers. Because they can draw off the people who are willing to travel to a smaller airport for the cheap fare. ABE is the best bet for the mid-atlantic. Very close to EWR and NYC and PHL. AS said in other threads PHL is a 3 hour drive from 25% of the US population. ABE is 90 mins from PHL and EWR, and under served. WN would pull from the same population pool as if it where in PHL or EWR and not contend w' US or CO's hubs. ABE is a great little airport. As for the South GSO is probably the best possiblity. WN wont go head to head in a carriers hub. Look at SFO as an example. Im not as familiar with the west so I won't venture a guess

User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6216 posts, RR: 11
Reply 24, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

This sounds stupid, but I would love to see Southwest fly into DAB . Right now we only have continental connection to Tampa and Delta/asa to ATL and Comair on sats to CVG. But we are to close to MCO.
Chepos



Fly the Flag!!!!
25 N2111J : I agree that Southwest would probably do well in ROC if they were to enter the market, but that's extremely unlikely unless US Air goes under. I belie
26 Jimbobjoe : I've always thought that Dayton was an opportunity for them--not going head on with Delta at CVG, but knowing that many would drive up there for servi
27 Post contains images BA : Don't forget that Colorado Springs is the fastest growing medium-sized city in the US. Currently its population stands at 500,000 and growing VERY fas
28 Post contains images RayChuang : I think WN is preparing for a MAJOR push into Colorado Springs (COS). I believe there is enough gate capacity available (ever since Western Pacific Ai
29 BA : The East Terminal which was built for Western Pacific is still empty. It only has 4 gates, but there are still a couple remaining gates in the main te
30 DCA-ROCguy : Last summer, before 9/11, Rochester's congresswoman had a request in for money in the next aviation trust fund bill, to add several gates to ROC for l
31 Post contains images 5280AGL : My short list: ABE (which is always that the top of the rumor list) COS - Why not? COS itself doesn't have the population base to support WN, but ther
32 RayChuang : I think WN right now is working out the economics of flying into COS. They probably have enough planes to fly to that airport from the airports I ment
33 Johnboy : Re: COS -- I have friends who have moved to the Denver area, and they're always telling me: "It's just as close to get you at Colorado Springs, as it
34 BH346 : AeroGlobeAir7 hit the nail right on the head about Wichita. It wouldn't happen anytime soon. When did Southwest say they were interested in Wichita? M
35 BA : 5280AGL, COS on its own can easily support WN, that's not the issue at all. COS is not a small city, nor a big city. It's a medium-sized city and grow
36 Zrs70 : Worcester Honolulu
37 Post contains images Mikeybien : The true COS question is whether or not WN thinks people will make the drive down from DEN even after F9 and UA match their fares. IMHO, WN has better
38 L-188 : Woodsboy can you come up with say 30 million of startup capitol.. Lets take AS on!!! I suggest starting a once a day run to Hawaii as a seed run then
39 Gsoflyer : Southwest has been at GSO looking around.... And the North Terminal (where I am sure they would be out of) is getting ready to be under major expansio
40 Post contains images 5280AGL : I still disagree...If COS was isolated by itself, without the the influence of Denver, they could not support WN service. COS has virtually no busines
41 KAUSpilot : WN really should serve COS. I remember when me and my family use to fly wn from SAT to Alberquerque every winter. Then we rented a car and made the 8
42 DCA-ROCguy : Regarding COS: Ray, surely you jest about WN facing any danger from a fare war from UA at DEN. WN has whupped United's fanny on on the West Coast, and
43 BA : 5280AGL, Regarding businesses, yes COS is a good sized business traveler market. A survey was conducted recently and a good percentage (about 50%) of
44 Mls515 : I've written off DSM. CID is closer to the population center of the state since Iowa is much more densely populated in the east. DSM is also too clos
45 Post contains images Swa tpa : Anybody think CHS (Charleston SC) has a prayer? Thats all I ask for of my company Start flying to CHS and make my whole family happy! CAE (Columbia SC
46 DCA-ROCguy : SWA tpa, you sound like someone to ask this question: what is the distribution of population in South Carolina? I always figured that if WN entered So
47 N766UA : Dayton (DAY) sounds like a good idea to me.
48 LV : Another point to make the case for CAE, they are only a 50 min drive to southern Charlotte. Augusta, GA is about 45 minutes away. Spartanburg/Greenvil
49 Gsoflyer : SC is a very odd state. There is GSP, CAE and CHS. Charleston would probably boom for Southwest in the summer with the tourist market. But, the rest o
50 Post contains images Swa tpa : Just got this letter in the mail, heres part of it. "As you know, we have recently announced the net addition of two new 737-700 aircraft in February,
51 Post contains images Gsoflyer : Well that sucks. In GSO, they wouldn't need to do much except come in the airport. They already advertise on most of the TV stations because of the o
52 TWA902fly : COS would do great, but the reason that WN can fly to places like LIT, SDF, is because those areas are very densely populated, even outside of city re
53 Lowfareair : >>Colorado Springs is popular for its hiking and biking trails and generally its outdoor activities.
54 PROSA : Worcester Pretty unlikely, I'd say. Most of the people who'd use ORH already are within reasonable distance of MHT, PVD or BDL.
55 Planelover : Hey all, I heard a while ago that the local airport (FAY) is trying to get WN to fly here. All they have now is US Air, Delta, and ASA. That sure woul
56 Post contains images Gsoflyer : But Fayetteville has the same problem as GSO, too close to RDU. Plus FAY serves a MUCH smaller area, and the surrounding area are much smaller, poorer
57 DCA-ROCguy : Spokane, along with Boise, joined the WN system when WN bought Morris Air in 1993. Morris Air was David Neeleman's first airline, and he designed it s
58 Post contains links and images FATFlyer : Here's a recent interview with Gary Kelley where he also says no new cities this year. I guess we'd better watch for 2 or 3 new ones this year still.
59 STT757 : My list: Jacksonville, Pensacola, Richmond, Pittsburgh, Hartford And for a wish list: Atlantic City
60 Post contains images Swa tpa : Thanks FATflyer for the good read I see that paper in our breakroom everyday and somehow we all missed it! By the way, we are the number 1 carrier out
61 PROSA : My list: Jacksonville, Pensacola, Richmond, Pittsburgh, Hartford You can scratch Hartford off the list, as WN already serves BDL.
62 DCA-ROCguy : STT757: My list: Jacksonville, Pensacola, Richmond, Pittsburgh, Hartford Jim: Scratch Jacksonville too--WN serves them as well! Watch for a swift entr
63 PROSA : HPN, similarly, is surrounded by wealthy super-NIMBY's who would go ape at the thought of a low-fare airline bringing hoi polloi and noise into their
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
TSA To Ban Ballpoints Next? WN Divert To TUL. 7/31 posted Tue Aug 1 2006 05:16:40 by Fiveholer
Next WS Cities? posted Thu Jun 8 2006 04:05:52 by Wolsingerjet
Question Re. Old Multi-stop Int'l Routes posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:01:41 by OB1783P
Question Re Old-New TG F Seats (box Behind You) posted Sun Nov 27 2005 05:23:00 by Fuffla
WN Cities Pairs That Have Lost Service posted Fri Oct 28 2005 16:52:15 by PVD757
Anyone Know If WN Has Or Will Consider SEA-PDX-SEA posted Mon Feb 21 2005 01:31:43 by RWA380
Next JetBlue Cities? posted Mon May 21 2001 02:55:13 by Amtran727
It's(Un)Official WN Will Open Two Cities Next Year posted Tue Oct 12 2004 06:02:43 by Jeffinbwi
RE: B6 To Announce 3 New Cities From FLL Later Today posted Thu Aug 23 2007 17:41:23 by MAH4546
Where Will WN Go Next? posted Wed May 30 2007 04:34:17 by FreequentFlier