Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada Will Not Operate YVR-MIA  
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4970 posts, RR: 51
Posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3445 times:

Air Canada wont be flying YVR-mIA this summer... the flights have been put on "R" status. In other words, the flight is cut.. not sure if it will be back for winter 03'

This again, baffles me! The flight was always full, and MIA is such a lucrative destination. But Uncle Milty will have you believe that his A319's are better on YYZ-DFW or YYZ-IAH than YVR-MIA... go figure..

Sorry MAH4546  Sad

Mark

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3361 times:

I thought that YVR-MIA was quite profitable for them last summer!??!

User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3362 times:

Donder10,

I never heard otherwise.... if you cant make YVR-MIA route work, I wonder what can then work???

MIA is such a high-demand destination from centres all over the world.....

To YYZ717, what do you make of this? Im interested as to what you will say  Smile

Rgds,
Mark


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3350 times:

Seems that AC is more content on market share than making a profit most of the time!

User currently offlineSunbird From Canada, joined Mar 2002, 285 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3345 times:

Welcome to The New Air Canada
personaly I think there new title should be

"We'll screw you every time!"

Just this morning I was listening to CBC Radio 1 and A lady sent in an e mail saying that she had called and resivered a seat for her 12 yo daughter to fly, AC even asked if she would be flying alone and the lady had said yes. About 4 hours before the flight as the day before the lady called to make shure everything was still ok (like most people do) everything was fine. Her daughter got to the airport got a boarding pass @ the ticket counter after her mother left the little girl went to the boarding area waited an extra 2 hours due to a delay and was then booted. AC left this young girl in an airport by herself, ofering no help at all.
What the hell does that say about OUR national airline? Thank god for Westjet or canada would be in a bigger mess than it is now..........just my 2 cents worth


User currently offlineRedraider From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 531 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3335 times:

It's all the French judge's fault.


My wife can't wrestle, but you should see her box.
User currently offlineJonPaulGeoRngo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

Seems to this casual observer (who happens to be in Houston) that you deploy your assets (A319s) where you have the opportunity sell the highest priced tickets. Both DFW and IAH have the business market to justify their service (or types of a/c used on the service) over a thin routing to a predominantly leisure destination.

I know, I know Mah4546, Miami has x population, x Fortune 500 companies, etc, etc...



User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3323 times:

Maybe AC should become Air Toronto?

User currently offlineSpyderz From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 651 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3290 times:

Being a Westerner, it's sad to see this happen, but since this was a leisure route for cruise passengers, planes would have to be quite full in order for a profit to be made. This probably was quite difficult with Air Canada screwing around with the schedule and flying on Fri and Sat only, for everybody likes a bit of flexibily. Also, this could do with AA re-starting Miami-Seattle service which was no-existent when the Vancouver route started. Like many AC decisions it sounds crazy, trying to shed some light on the reason (maybe?).

User currently offlineSlawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3799 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3288 times:

GIVE IT UP ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Air Canada is loosing a Billion dollars a year, and you will sit there and tell me that Milton, and his people will drop a western route because it does not originate in Toronto even if it makes more money then a possible YYZ route??? You must be on crack!, Stop bitching about how your city is underserved, THERE IS NO SUCH THING!!!!!!!!! They are served according to the market predictions, and demographics that companies spend millions of dollars on each year. I still dont understand how you people think that airlines avoid your city because you are not YYZ, that is simply insane! The airlines serve the cities that they can make money in, and thats IT!!!!! If they do not see a summer time market for a route then they will drop it, and use the airplane and crews on a route that will make money.....


"Clive Beddoe says he favours competition, but his actions do not support that idea." Robert Milton - CEO Air Canada
User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 10, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Oh well. I hope it comes back in the future. We'll see what happens. This baffles me though, especially because first class was always going out full from the loads I saw. Miami-Vancouver is a big leisure market, but also connected two Star Alliance hubs.


a.
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3288 times:

! The airlines serve the cities that they can make money in, and thats IT!!!!!
And AC cant make money!


User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3271 times:

FLYYUL, the flight is no longer bookable at aircanada.com for the summer, but is bookable for winter 2002 (the date I put in was 30Nov02). I don't know how far they update thier schedule or how AC updates thier schedules, but if they were ending the flight completely, wouldn't they have wiped it out of the schedule completely (that's how American Airlines does it)? So can this be considered, for now, a suspension?

Spyderz, where did you read AA is bring back MIA-SEA? There were some articles in the Herald that said the flights may be back this fall. Tomorrow or Friday AA will probably realese the summer changes at Miami (most of which I've already seen; 19 new dailies; three new destinations), and, so far, SEA is not in the cards for the summer.



a.
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

Hmmmm ok....

Look at this stat, YYZ-DFW load factor for november 01' was 43%, and 44% in 00' ...... you need to sell 80% high-yield of those 44% load factor achieved....

There are MANY markets that AC can exploit that are underserved, and we should stop being all naive, and thinking that AC knows more than us, it must know whats its doing. Tell me this much, how does a MONOPOLY carrier lose 1.25 billipon a year, then have the balls to tell investors that they are in better shape than American carriers. American Carriers are all beating each other up for market share, while AC's has got the whole country in a holding pattern.......

I, for one second, dont give them an inch of credibility. You know what, YVR-MIA is leisure, but its all business. Miami is still a huge business centre, with TOP-DOllar tourists.... Dont tell me Houston or Dallas will attract higher-yield, I dont believe it for a second... Miami is an international destination...

Mark


User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 14, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

FLYYUL is right. Also, from what I heard, a large amount of MIA-YVR traffic was Miami-originating going on towards Asian destinations, which is why the flight downgraded to weekend service for the winter. And trade between Miami and Canada is huge, probably just as big, if not bigger, than trade between all of Texas and Canada. Air Canada sends 767s on the Miami-Toronto route and has no problem filling up all classes. And it's not just MIA-YVR. AC does this all the time.


a.
User currently offlineSlawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3799 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3237 times:

"Tell me this much, how does a MONOPOLY carrier lose 1.25 billipon a year, "
I'll tell you why they are a monopoly and are still loosing money like you say, its because they are strong armed by the government, and blowhards who cry and bitch about how their town with a population of 50 000 people doesnt have enough heavy jet service. If this were the US, and AC was a US airline they would be serving half the cities that they do now on domestic routes. If you know so much more then air canada execs then why dont you have their job? Go take over from uncle mitly and see how long you lst flying routes out of places that have no need for thos routes, just because you want to see a 747-400 in Montreal, or Winnipeg.

"I, for one second, dont give them an inch of credibility. You know what, YVR-MIA is leisure, but its all business. Miami is still a huge business centre, with TOP-DOllar tourists.... Dont tell me Houston or Dallas will attract higher-yield, I dont believe it for a second... Miami is an international destination... "

Oh yeah that right, the home base of American Airlines is not a major international destination....and neither Houston or Dallas have anthing worth doing business with, its not like they have oil companies down there or anhything...I'm sure a little old couple going on a cruise will make more money for AC, then a few oil execs.

The reason Air Canada is in the STAR Alliance is because they want to maximize the use and earning potential of all their planes and all their routes, If that means that you have to make a stop in ORD on your way to MIA from YVR then thats your problem, AC is still getting a share of the money you paid for the ticket, and they didnt need to use their own plane on the route.....



"Clive Beddoe says he favours competition, but his actions do not support that idea." Robert Milton - CEO Air Canada
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 16, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3231 times:

Houston is most DEFINATELY a bigger business destination than Miami. As for Dallas, it's questionable. I'd say its a tie.

Houston is one of the top business destinations of the world. Not only does it have the most Fortune 500 companies in the US (21 I think), but it is of course the heart of Oil business in the US which is the #1 import in the US.

Miami is a big business destination, but not nearly as big as Houston. I don't think any city in the US can compare with Houston in terms of business..........

Anyways, it's a shame that Air Canada is dropping YVR-MIA. I'm not surprised though, Air Canada always does some strange decisions by dropping routes....

However, it's not a huge loss. Passengers can connect in Dallas (DFW) if they want to go to Vancouver (YVR).

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 17, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3231 times:

There is no doubting Houston is a bigger business destination than Miami, but not from Canada. As for Miami, few people know that the biggest industry in Miami is banking and finance, not tourism.


a.
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 18, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3217 times:

Mah4546,

Houston is a larger international destination from nearly every part of the world except for South America and the Caribbean which of course Miami is the leader of.

Houston is a city smaller than Dallas, yet they have so much more international service. Emirates has mentioned that they plan to serve IAH in the near future.

Houston is a big destination from just about anywhere.

I am sure MIA-YVR did great, but when you are saying MIA-YVR is more important than IAH, well that is just wrong.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3184 times:

Ha ok!....

I mentionned the fact that AC ran a 45% load factor to DFW and a 43% to IAH in nov 00'.... so you tell me exactly how important to destinationsare to AC's nucleus... YYZ-IAH is a business route, with virtually no possible feed beyond IAH with AC..

Meanwhile, you've got two star alliance hubs YVR and MIA, important connections to HUGE latin american destinations can be made with AC/UA only.... we are not talking about YVR-IAH with AC, im speaking about moving the A319 from an ailing destination like IAH or DFW, or moving it out of Air Toronto, I mean AIr Canada..

Slawko, your reason why AC is losing 1.25 billion is pure BS. These little towns are now WestJet towns in the west, and soon to be in the East. They can pull out of tere if they want, they've done it in Quebec. Im sure that 1 B1900 going from Montreal to Sept-Iles is the reason why AC is losing money (BTW, that flight is always full, so at least they should break-even with an efficient aircraft like that)...

If MIA was a sucgh a low-yield place, why would it now be the No.1 International traffic city in the USA and North America. Major European airlines, Latin American, Carribean, African and North American airlines all conglomerate into this huge area, which is a WORLD-CLASS city.... im not saying IAH or DFW are not HUGe buesiness centres, they are, but they arent WORLD-CLASS cities, and some of the most succesful people on this earth, reside in the South Florida area....

If your Air Canada, and you want to expand your 3 main hubs; YYZ, YVR and YUL, and you cant make what seems to be BASIC routes like YVR-MIA or YUL-DEN, then whats the point? But I believe that they were working, they achieved high-load factors (cant confirm the yields), but its inconceivable to me these flights are worth to be suspended...... it makes me angry that despite market trends (there are many underserved LARGE O&D combinations from YVR, YYC and YUL), AC has the balls to chop these routes, ever so quietly....... with the public not noticing..

YVR-MIA is a lucrative route: two star alliance hubs, two business centres, two huge tourist centres, cruise hubs, and world-class cities... I, for one, dont believe that this route wasnt profitable for AC.... its too hard to imagine it being...

Mark





User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 20, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3194 times:

BA, myth #1: Miami's international community is exclusively from Latin American and the Caribbean. That is a huge misconception. Miami's links with Europe (and Miami has one of America's largest European national populations, much larger than Houston's; #4 in the US I believe) are huge, much bigger than Houston's links with Europe. Miami also has very strong links to Africa (notably South Africa; and Air Namibia's proposed Houston route would go via MIA), the Middle East (namely Saudi Arabia and Israel, and MIA has been mentioned as an EK destination as well), and Asia (namely Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand). I'm not going to go into a whole spiel, but Miami's international links go far beyond Latin America. International banking dominates the City of Miami's economy.


a.
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

Coming from international communities we experience in Montreal and Toronto, I would definitely agree that of the many major US urban areas, New York, LA, Miami and Boston are the most multicultured!

mark


User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 22, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3188 times:

And BA, what do you mean by so much more international service at IAH than DFW?


Long-Haul international services:

IAH:
CO to LGW 12x a week (soon 14x)
BA to LGW 7x a week
BA to LHR via IAD 7x a week (end of Apr)
LH to FRA 5x a week (soon 7x)
CO to FRA 7x a week
CO to CDG 7x a week
AF to CDG 7x a week
KL to AMS 7x a week
CO to AMS 7x a week (soon)
CO to NRT 7x a week (that flight actually orginates at MIA)
+GRU, LIM, GIG, UIO
+World Airways 1x a week to Angola

DFW:
AA to LGW 14x a week
AA to CDG 7x a week
AA to FRA 7x a week
AA to zRH 7x a week
BA to LGW 7x a week
LH to FRA 5x a week (soon 7x)
KE to ICN 3x a week
AA to NRT 11x a week
+GRU, SCL, LIM
(before 9.11 Sabena to BRU, Air France to CDG, JAL to NRT, AA to KIX)

IAH does have more long-haul flights, but it's not a big difference. IAH wins thanks to the effects of 9.11. Both have pretty weak compeitition on trans-Atlantic/Pacific flights. DFW with only 2 European carriers and one Asian carrier (it was 4/2 before 9.11) and IAH with only 4 European and no Asian carriers.



a.
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 23, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3177 times:

Slawko & JonPaulGeoRingo are correct.

There are many factors that go into a route profitability. ONLY the AC insiders know route profitability though, not us. High load factors do not imply profitability. Traffic feed from MIA to Asia thru YVR (even business traffic) is not necessarily high yielding on the MIA-YVR leg since the fare is usually based on the entire trip. YYZ-DFW/IAH routings are usually point-to-point with no feed so I can see them as very high yielding and profitable with only 45% loads. MIA is a mixed business/leisure destination in general....but from YVR, it may have been more leisure (and hence less business)...who knows? Not us.

An A319 committed to YVR-MIA would be a 12-13 hour vv operation...in other words, an ENTIRE day's A319 flying...perhaps that A319 was better deployed on 4 daily YVR-YYC vv or 3 daily YYZ-BOS flights.

AC would have fairly sophisticated revenue mgmt and route profitability modeling...perhaps the YVR-MIA just didn't make money on a fully-allocated basis. Perhaps there were crewing or scheduling issues. We'll never know.








Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineMah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 24, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3166 times:

We'll never know why MIA-YVR was suspended, though it is my understanding that A LOT of the Miami-originating passengers went on to Asia from an article that apperaed in Miami New Today. None the less, it is bookable at aircanada.com for the fall. I don't know if this is an error or not, however.


a.
25 Crj-900 : I never thought I would see the day. I could not agree more with what Slawko and yyz717 have said. All Air Canada’s financial information is not
26 Lymanm : "I, for one, dont believe that this route wasnt profitable for AC.... its too hard to imagine it being... " Why must you insist that AC has a dark and
27 FLYYUL : So if it isnt reliable, then tis off by +- 5% ...... that gives either 40% or 50% load factor.. who are you kidding? Lymanm, if AC is in cost cutting
28 Mah4546 : Well, there might be a silver lining, because just very, very recently I was able to speak to a friend that works for AA as an MIA-based FA and today
29 Slawko : "Lymanm, if AC is in cost cutting mode, what's all this trans-atlantic expansion to lower yield markets.... " Because they have seen a need, or demand
30 Mah4546 : Nobody knows if MIA-YVR made money or not. I'm not saying it did, I am not saying it didn't, but profitable flights are dropped. Maybe the A319 was be
31 Mah4546 : USAirways is resuming non-stop service between Pittsburgh and Paris (767) and Pittsburgh and London Gatwick at the end of this month. Good news for PI
32 Mah4546 : Sorry, ignore the above post.
33 Yyz717 : CRJ-900: "I never thought I would see the day. I could not agree more with what Slawko and yyz717 have said." Thanks! I think.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
RAF Will NOT Operate New British Govt Jets. posted Thu Jun 22 2006 13:50:14 by ZE701
Air Canada To Increase SAN-YVR To 2x Daily posted Mon Mar 20 2006 11:19:47 by Trvlr
Air Canada Seeks To Operate Some USAirways Flights posted Mon Oct 10 2005 19:52:02 by KarlB737
Air Canada. Why Not To MAD Again? posted Fri Sep 9 2005 21:55:47 by Anxebla
Air Canada 001 Rerouted To YVR On A Regular Basis? posted Sat Feb 19 2005 02:40:43 by Ktachiya
AC Will NOT Fly YVR-TPE Summer 2004 posted Thu Dec 25 2003 21:39:51 by FLYYUL
Air Canada May Not Take New Aircraft posted Tue Apr 8 2003 03:22:46 by BOEING747-700
Air Canada Slashes YYC-YXX/YVR Fares posted Fri Nov 23 2001 20:15:49 by YKA
Air Canada A340 Or United 777(Mia-Gru) In Econ. posted Sat Jul 8 2000 03:28:35 by Lantern88
YVR-MIA Non-stop Air Canada A319!? posted Sat Dec 15 2001 08:13:19 by Twa902fly