Website About 757 Into The Pentagon — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Website About 757 Into The Pentagon

Flyinghighboy From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 744 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 927 times:

I am not sure if this has been posted before but I find this site quite appaling.
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

6 replies: All unread, jump to last

UAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2130 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 835 times:

For someone who finds this site appaling, you sure did a good job of publicizing it to everyone.

AirT85 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 823 times:

If this man doesn't believe American Airlines flight 77 was crashed into the Pentagon, where does he think it went? There is no doubt American Airlines flight 77 crashed, and American Airlines had a 757 go missing, so if it didn't crash into the Pentagon, I'd like to know where he thinks it went. >=(
Tony

Avilitigator From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 214 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 815 times:

Take the website with a grain of salt (OK, maybe a bulldozer full). Typical conspiracy theorist website, so I wouldn't believe too much of the editorial. For a less biased story and photo, check out the www.airdisaster.com website, which shows a photo taken by a Pentagon surveillance camera right after the 757 hit. I believe....

Da man From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 887 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 792 times:

That was definitly not an aircraft of any type or size!
Why would the DOD put out something like the story it told?
da man

War Eagle!

Jonathan L From United States of America, joined May 2001, 169 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 769 times:

The author of the conspiracy website fails to mention that this wedge of the building was recently renovated. This is the most likely reason as to why the building withstood the impact without sustaining more damage.

The website also incorrectly states that the aircraft penetrated only the outside ring. This CNN article states that it penetrated three of the rings.

Serge From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1989 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 756 times:

Here is the exact photo taken from airdisaster.com:

I wonder who didn't do their job making sure the date was set right? Jeeeez... "Officials could not immediately explain why the date typed near the bottom of each photograph is Sept. 12 and the time is written as 5:37 p.m. The attack happened at about 9:37 a.m. on Sept. 11. Officials said it was possible that the date and time were added the day after the attack when they may have been catalogued for investigative purposes."

Here are the rest of the 5 photos if you care to see:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/720851.asp?cp1=1

...Serge

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: