Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Environmentalists & [the Problem With] The SST  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1460 times:

Noise/chemical pollution and the sonic boom is what environmentalists hate about SST's, if someone could get rid of one of these major stumbling blocks, would they gain the trust of those who hate SST's?

Or is this just a pipe-dream, huh?


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJustplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

IMAO, most of the vocal environmentalists will find anything to complain about, especially with regards to technological advances. Of course, they make their objections known thru e-mail, computer-generated flyers, and making cell-phone calls to the media. There are probably some environemntal groups and even more individuals that are more genuine in their concern about our stewardship of the Lord's creation, but they do not get the headlines that the radicals do.


"So many planes; so little time..."
User currently offlineGerardo From Spain, joined May 2000, 3481 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

It will be hard to convince them, in my opinion.

If Boeing really manages to produce an aircraft will less pollution, above all regarding engine noise and chemical pollution, then I'm sure, the environmentalists will have less to oppose.

BUT: On the other hand, if new technologies are developped to make the SST environmental-friendlier, why not apply the same technic to a "conventional" aircraft, and make this one even better?

Gerardo



dominguez(dash)online(dot)ch ... Pushing the limits of my equipment
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1382 times:

Hardcore environmentalists will not stop at anything short of the complete dismantling of the technological society and the return to their idylic life "in harmony with nature" (but without hunting or farming as those obviously damage the environment).


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

Probably airliners.net is not the best place to defend "hardcore environmentalists"

however

Those extremely loud, polluting, smoking and fuel sucking DC8's, 707's, BAC1-11, etc.

I think we must be glad that they are banned now ... and it wasn't the spotters / aircraft enthousiasts that were behind this improvement !

I still like to see a howling smoking DC8 however ..


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Steve Williams




User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

No one will ever thank a "enviromentalist" when a 757 or A320 flys over and you can barely hear it. Have you seen all the Canadian Geese that are back ? its was those damn "enviromentalists" baning DDT use ... now our nose cowls and fan blades are takeing a beating... yeah the world would be better off if the "enviromentalists" would just let corporate greed run un-checked....


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4696 posts, RR: 42
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

The point is that environmentalists are not so much concerned about noise or pollution levels of some aircraft types. Their main argument is that there is a lot of "unnecessary" air traffic going on.

Of course, these exact people still want to use the latest computer hardware, eat exotic fruit and take part in fancy self-experience tours, visiting the Himalaya.

OK, I am simplifying the problem a bit, but you get my point. If you're enjoying the positive sides of our "modern world", you gotta accept some of the negative side-effects.

On an interesting side-note, a poll amongst German voters has demonstrated that people voting for the Green Party are likely to go on vacation more frequently and to more distant places than voters of "ecology-unfriendly" parties.

Hmm...  Yeah sure




Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13253 posts, RR: 77
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1326 times:

Just in case that an unforseen technological advance did manage to get around the emissions problem, Friends Of The Earth made it quite clear in the early 1990's that they would campaign against the 'possible' effects of a large fleet of SST's sonic-booms on marine life. They clearly thought that any new SST would like Concorde, be restricted to overwater supercruise.
Indeed that was both Boeing and BAe/Aerospatiales thinking then, try to make an efficent SST in both subsonic and supersonic flight.
Never mind that there is no evidence, and no research has been done, into any possible effect of frequent booms on marine life.
But there is no technical panecea for the SST's problems.
SST is a hate word to many.
As much as I love Concorde, I live near enough LHR to be glad that the originally projected 200-400 aircraft were not built.


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Let's say that in a couple decades at the most, there came an aircraft that does not harm the environment in any way, yet is still efficient enough to be economical -- for the sake of argument -- what could they possibly whine about?

There is absolutly nothing to whine about, it is perfect, it is a dream...  Love



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1314 times:

I dream about not needing oil anymore ... just think about all the human lifes that would be saved if we didn't need oil ??? we can make an aircraft thats solar or hydrogen powered... thats where the future should be ....


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1295 times:

I dream about not needing oil anymore

What are you saying ?! What will happen to Emirates, Saudi & Gulf Air ?

And who will buy those beautiful BBJ ´s for their sons & friends to go shopping in London & New York ?!

Man, you have to weigh your words !!

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy

keesje


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Environmentalists & [the Problem With] The SST posted Mon Mar 11 2002 01:39:58 by Lehpron
The Problem With The Majors posted Wed Jun 2 2004 21:56:28 by N6376m
What Was The Problem With Air Chinas 767 At ARN? posted Fri May 21 2004 17:57:35 by Leviticus
Problem With The A380 posted Sun May 16 2004 23:51:06 by AirEMS
Whats The Problem With Iberia? posted Wed Oct 29 2003 02:55:10 by Dtwrunner
What's The Problem With Lax? posted Thu Jan 17 2002 09:51:09 by Varig md-11
What Is Delta Doing About The 757 Problem? posted Sat Jul 7 2001 04:15:38 by Delta777-XXX
ONE BIG Problem With The 757-300 IN The U.S posted Wed Feb 28 2001 23:13:14 by ATA L1011
What's The Problem With Slow Climbers? posted Wed Feb 14 2001 22:06:33 by SAA-SAL
What´s The Problem With Delta? posted Fri Jun 16 2000 00:11:09 by Dellatorre