Spark From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1972 times:
I would've assumed it was LHR, since thwre seems to be more smaller airlines in Europe than US, and more Asian airlines serve Europe than the USA. I would guess FRA and LHR would take the cake. MIA has a ton, because there are so many Latin Airlines flying to MIA.
BTW, isn't LHR at such a runway slot shortage that it couldn't fit anymore flights.
Ryanb741 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 3222 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (12 years 11 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1925 times:
I can't see how it can be LHR. Remember, you have at least half a dozen US carriers that aren't allowed to fly there and must go to LGW instead, as well as many African carriers who can only get slots at LGW. Also, carriers like Garuda etc.
If you combined LHR and LGW together, that would definitely be number 1, but because of slot restrictions/Bermuda I can't see how it could be LHR.
I used to think the brain is the most fascinating part of my body. But, hey, who is telling me that?
Arsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 19
Reply 17, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1854 times:
LHR is extremely slot constrained, there simply isn't any more space for additional services, the runways are clogged, (only 2 being used, when there's 3) the gates are always full and generally LHR is operating at maximum capacity. LHR needs T5 as quick as possible and a 4th runway.