Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747-400 "lite"?  
User currently offlineAT From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1044 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

I have noticed that on the flights from London to the US East Coast , British Airways usually uses its Boeing 747-400 aircraft with the G-BNLA through Z registrations.
Therefore, I had assumed, these must be the "lite"-designated aircraft which are used for shorter flights that do not require so much fuel.

Yet, in pictures on this website, I have seen pictures of the G BNL series aircraft in cities such as Sydney and Hong Kong, which are much longer routes, suggesting that these aircraft are NOT the "lite" aircraft.

Does any one have any information? Or is my information wrong and all the BA 747-400s have the identical range and fuel capacity?

Thanks

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1059 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

Lite is a newer version of the aircraft with weight-saving measures in plaace to enable a very slightly more efficient fuel consumption and a very slightly increased range.
BA has 10 such 747-400 Lites, and im trying to figure which ones they are... i think they are the late G-CIV* models... as G-BNL aircaft were first to be delivered.
I know City of London (G-BNLA) was first to be delivered.
I do see a lot of G-BYG* aircraft in Sydney and i got a G-CIV to Singapore so maybe some of the BYG and CIV are the lites... i will look into it...


User currently offlineB-HOP From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2000, 637 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1355 times:

I think is CIVD/E/F/G


Live life to max!!!
User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1301 times:

Good question. I have seen the 'lite' designation and have wondered about it also.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
747-400 "lite"? posted Mon Mar 11 2002 17:02:14 by AT
747-400 "Sin Bin" posted Tue Jun 12 2001 01:23:19 by Jet-A gasguy
Will The 747-400 "stretch" Be A Match For The A3XX posted Sun Jun 25 2000 01:01:39 by Continental
747-400 "lite" posted Sun Mar 21 1999 13:35:40 by Alan
Randy's Blog: 747 Is The "Shape Of The Future" posted Sat Dec 9 2006 09:25:32 by Leelaw
Fate Of SAA 747-300 "Ndizani" posted Fri Apr 22 2005 09:48:14 by Euclid
News On VS 747-219 "Classic" Disposal posted Sat Jan 15 2005 14:11:47 by Intheknow
KLM 747 On "Alias" posted Mon Oct 11 2004 07:08:53 by SoBe
"You Can't Make A Bad Landing In A 747"? posted Sun Mar 23 2003 13:56:34 by Cedarjet
Lufthansa 747-200 "Bremen" posted Tue Sep 17 2002 20:12:33 by B737-700