Slawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3803 posts, RR: 8 Posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2022 times:
Just thought I would share a bit of Aviation History with all of you.....
The AVRO Jetliner - When we use the term Jetliner today we us it as a general term to describe virtually any commercial passenger aircraft. But in 1949, this term was a name rather then a description. The AVRO Jetliner was the trade mark name of North Americans FIRST, and the Worlds Second Jet passenger aircraft. On August 10th 1949 the AVRO Jetliner made it's first flight. It was developed out of a requirement for a 30 passenger 1,200NM range aircraft from Trans Canada Airlines. The airplane had to cruse at 400MPH and be able to operate from existing 4000 ft runways.
Initial plans called for the airplane to be powered by powered by two new powerful Rolls-Royce AJ65 Engines, but the British Authorities were not willing to release these new powerful engines to a civilian airliner, especially one built outside of England. The decision was made to replace the two engines with four less powerful engines. Unfortunately this decision was not approved of by TCA, and they pulled out of the program. Nevertheless AVRO continued on with its plan to build the jet. Two years after it's inception the airplane was making it's first taxi tests, and on August 10th the aircraft took to the skies for the first time. This was a full five years before the Boeing 707 was completed. At the time Canada was still under the British Empire, and as such the British authorities did not want one of their commonwealth nations beating them in aviation history, as such the AVRO plane was delayed by 14 days so that the DeHavilland Comet could be the worlds first passenger jet aircraft. The Jetliner would go on to make a few "Firsts", on April 18th 1950 the jetliner mad the worlds first ever "jetmail" service between Toronto, and New York, it also set a record for the shortest flight between the two cities, at a mere 58 minutes, as opposed to the usual 1 hour 45 mins. Even though TCA was not interested in the airplane, several American airlines, as well as the Canadian and American air forces were interested in this new plane. Howard Hughes had the airplane flown to his plant in California where he test flew the airplane, and indicated that he would like a few for his airlines, TWA and National. The increasing Korean war, and the threat of a Soviet Attack of North America meant that the project was scrapped, in favour of increased CF-100 production. IN 1953 the project was almost restarted, but in the end the aircraft met the fate of many of AVRO's aircraft and was cut up into pieces and sold for scrap. Today the only part that remains of the aircraft is a section of the nose, currently at the Canadian Aeronautical Collection in Ottawa.
Fallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1945 times:
It's a real shame how the Canadian government screwed over Avro on so many projects. They were so far ahead of their time, Arrow, Jetliner, they were even proposing a mach 3 Arrow. Some say the performance of the Arrow still isn't matched today.
Gmonney From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2160 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1922 times:
It is a shame, That Avro was and could have been a landmark aircraft. I know that this informatiion is out there....but where did you get it.????? Some of this stuff I didn't know....Oh great site, i will have to read more about it!!!
GDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13457 posts, RR: 77
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1866 times:
Ironic that the UK goverment helped to screw a Canadian project, they usually just do that sort of thing to British industry.
The engine excuse is pure BS. A few years earlier the same goverment sold R/R Nene jet engines to the USSR.
Without the Nene, the Mig-15 would have been like the original P-51's, before they got the Merlin engine.
As soon as they allowed this sale in 1946, they went on to cancel the Miles M.52 research aircraft, then nearing completion.
This aircraft could have broken the sound barrier months before Yeager in the Bell X-1.
And the M.52 was a proper jet aircraft, not a rocket-vehicle carried by a B-29 bomber.
A few of my colleauges in BA Concorde engineering started their working lives on the TSR2 project at Vickers, or in the RAF. Despite happily working on Concorde at BA for 25-35 years, they are still angry about the axeing of the TSR2 in 1965.
Some engineers from the Jetliner and later CF-105 programmes, joined NASA.
No pics of the M.52 in the photo index.
L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 30148 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1784 times:
Actually you can partially count two British contributions to dead Canadian airplane projects.
The Arrow was originally going to be flown with Rolls Royce engines. But that engine project was cancelled. This forced Avro to design their own engine. The development of this engine pushed the Arrow project back.
Acutally the cancellation of the Arrow did help one country's aircraft engine program. The French government had orders for the Irqouis(spl?) engine from Canada. The engine project was cancelled with the Arrow and the French where forced to develop their highly successfull ATAR engine family, which was used in their Mirage fighters.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
CV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1777 times:
Everytime someone talks about this I have a pain in my heart!!!! Politics it's the worth think we have in our world. The Jetliner and the Arrow ended because of pure politics, nothing else, and when these things happen we must always take a lesson! My aplause go to all the workers of Avro that one day had a dream and a bunch of politics ended that like a nightmare!
Slawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3803 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1752 times:
At least the industry in Canada has been able to come back and make great aircraft once again....Although can you imagine where our insudtry would be today had Avro been able to continue?? Hats off to all the people of Bombardier who keep Canada a vital player in the worlds aviation marketplace.!!
Captaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1720 times:
Canada trully has a wonderful industry, but unfortunately, much like everything else that is Canadian, there is a lot of modesty to go with it. We as Canadians just don't show the pride that other nations often show, and that's such a shame! We are trully capable of many wonderful things in this country, and Bombardier is just one example of what we can accomplish!
So let's hope that in the future, we can show the world even more of what we are capable of. The Canadian Aviation Museum in Ottawa is a great example of what we've done, and it shall grow as we do more in the future! The Toronto Aviation Enthusiasts website is a way for us to celebrate Canadian aviation and get like minded people together for some good times!
"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
Slawko From Canada, joined May 1999, 3803 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (13 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1668 times:
The Dash-7 was developed by DHC, then Boeing bought them and the Dash-8 was developed, the only thing is when beoing was in charge the program was a bit of a dud, and they could not make the regional airplane market move. It was after boeing sold DHC that the airplane line really took off, and all of the other variants of the 8 were built....not to mention the global express!
"Clive Beddoe says he favours competition, but his actions do not support that idea." Robert Milton - CEO Air Canada