Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada Refuses To Carry Salman Rushdie  
User currently offlineLayitontheline From Canada, joined Jan 2002, 85 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1699 times:

Air Canada refuses to carry Rushdie


OTTAWA (CP) - Author Salman Rushdie may be free to enter Canada, but not on the country’s biggest airline.
Air Canada refuses to carry him, saying security measures necessary to protect him from assassins would cause unacceptable inconvenience to passengers.

Rushdie is under a death sentence imposed by Iranian religious leaders for his book Satanic Verses, which they claim blasphemes Islam.

An Air Canada e-mail to travel agencies and airport ticket counters this month, obtained by The Canadian Press, states that Rushdie is not to be carried as a passenger.

“Should author Salman Rushdie attempt a reservation or present himself at an airport he is not - repeat not - to be accepted for carriage,” says the memo.

It also says any attempt by Rushdie to travel on the airline is to be immediately reported to Air Canada’s legal department.

Air Canada says a U.S. Federal Aviation Administration directive requires certain security measures be in place if Rushdie is on an airline entering the U.S.

Air Canada spokeswoman Laura Cook said Friday that the airline concluded the same measures would be required on flights within Canada and elected not to carry him as a passenger either domestically or internationally.

“We are following an FAA directive and generally presume that if there is a security risk in the U.S. there is one domestically for us,” Cook said.

She said the measures, which she would not divulge, could delay flights by up to three hours.

“We have chosen to follow the directive in Canada rather than inconvenience our passengers,” she said.

Cook suggested other Canadian airlines would also refuse to carry Rushdie, but at least one said that’s not the case.

“At this time we have no reason not to fly him,” said WestJet spokeswoman Siobhan Vinish.

She said the airline, which only operates domestically, likely wouldn’t bar Rushdie unless there was a ruling from Transport Canada.

A spokesman for Air Transat said he hadn’t heard of any security issue involving Rushdie but would look into the matter.

Rushdie, who is promoting a new book, was supposed to speak in Toronto in September but cancelled after the Sept. 11 terror attacks in the U.S. It’s not clear if he intends to return soon.

The FAA directive was issued before Sept. 11.
_____________________

The Toronto Star
Saturday March 16th 2002


Im glad, wise choice on AC's part!!!















24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1627 times:

Completely rubbish, who should they ban from flying with them next time, Britney Spears? "We don´t want
our plane soaked with urine"...


User currently offlineLayitontheline From Canada, joined Jan 2002, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1610 times:

Britney Spears is not a security threat, Im glad that Air Canada will not allow Salman Rushdie on-board. Why should Air Canada inconvience and put into danger the lives of inocent passengers???

User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

WAY TO GO AIR CANADA!







UAL 777 CONTRAILS


User currently offlineSquigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1576 times:

I think it was a wise move. I am a little dissapointed with Westjet, though. I am a huge fan of theirs, but when they said they would carry him (where would he fly to with them anyway) it showed a kind of risky, daring attitude for them to take.


Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5351 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1551 times:

Unfortunately, AC, like BA before them, are bowing to extremism by not allowing Salman Rushdie to travel aboard their aircraft. However, it is true that the security risk incurred by carrying Mr. Rushdie is quite high. It's your basic Catch 22: carry him and face the risk, don't carry him and bow to extremists.


Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16335 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1545 times:

What's the big deal? Is Salmon Rushdie a frequent visitor to Canada anyway?

Aw jeez.....I hope they don't ban Britney Spears as well. Canada needs more blond virgins visiting our country.





Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSquigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

Statistically, there is only a small risk, but if something did happen while he was a passenger, there would be major questions AC would have to answer to.


Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5351 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1535 times:

I don't think the issue is over Salman Rushdie visiting Canada. From what I could glean from the article, it is his use of AC to enter the US that AC is attempting to restrict.


Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16335 posts, RR: 56
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1532 times:

Seriously, this is wrong. This is a victory to the Iranian govt (who still have an active fatwa against Rushdie). If AC has confidence in its flight & ground security, then it should be able to safely carry Rushdie.


Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1516 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Has rushdie flown before? Is he allowed on other airlines?


In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25566 posts, RR: 86
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1476 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There's an old Australian joke: "Mate, I'm busier than Salman Rushdie's travel agent!"

He flies all over the world - he's been to Australia, and I've seen him in Los Angeles. He's been back to India.

So why the big deal about it now?

Cheers

mariner




aeternum nauta
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1449 times:

We're letting the terrorists win! Way to go air Canada!  Insane

what next? Ban Americans from flying on AC aircraft???



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineGeotrash From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1442 times:

This is unfortunate. Mr. Rushdie has the same right to travel as the rest of us. He is not a criminal. A risk? Perhaps. Criminal? No. Last I checked, the law forbids anyone to be denied their freedoms unless they are convicted of a crime. Provisions need to be made to ensure that the risk is mitigated, and that Rushdie can travel safely and without discrimination. It is possible to do this. That may mean an inconvenience or cost, but much greater prices have been paid in the past to ensure that we all have certain rights and freedoms.

Perhaps it would not be in Mr. Rushdie's own best interests to travel commercially. Rather, a private charter might be better for his own safety. However, if he chooses to take the risk of flying commercially, he must be given that option. It scares me the way some people think it's no big deal to trample on a person's right to travel (or any other right), simply because it is "inconvenient" to do otherwise. He has as much right to a ticket than the rest of us. If AC can't guarantee the safety of the flight, then there are other problems that need to be addressed.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1437 times:

Got agree with you there Marco.

Why would additional security be needed for him anyway. I thought all passengers where supposed to be screened before they got on the airplane.

If all passengers are being screened then there should be no danger to him.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2597 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1431 times:

I've got to agree that if security measure are up to par, then there shouldn't be a problem.

Of course the larger problem of this religious decree underscores the absolute contempt I have for any religion that produces such hatred and violence. But that's for another thread.


User currently offlineNotar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

britney would go on virgin airlines. who is this rushdie guys anyway? Another towel head?

User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1401 times:

would anyone mind to enlighten me about the person of Salmon Rushdie??????
who he is and what he´s done?
he´s a book author and the Iranian government doesn´t like him, ok, ... but i´ve never heard of him.

thanks
daniel



If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
User currently offlineJplenny From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1402 times:

Notar -

Salman Rushdie wrote a book called the Satanic Verses.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312270828/qid=1016363375/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_67_3/103-2351746-9084663

Because of this book a FATWA was issued, sentancing him to death. Basically he's a target of assasination because he wrote something that offended the religion of Islam.

"I inform the proud Muslim people of the world that the author of the Satanic Verses book which is against Islam, the Prophet and the Koran, and all involved in its publication who were aware of its content, are sentenced to death."
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
FATWA issued February, 1989
against Salman Rushdie


User currently offlineContinentalFan From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 357 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1393 times:

That's the problem, in Islam, any cleric can pronounce a fatwa against anybody (pretty much for any reason), not like there's any official chain of command like the catholic church. Anybody can then choose to follow it or not. Since Khomeini is dead, it's gonna be in effect forever, since only Khomeini can revoke it. The situation is analogous to Jerry Falwell (well known televangelist in the US) pronouncing a fatwah on Britney. Rushdie didn't even write anything a normal person zould consider offensive, Khomeini just didn't like it. What a total crock.

Mike.


User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1356 times:

Is everybody who has read or seen or heard of the book also sentenced to death?
'Cause Air Canada may have to refuse millions of people carriage.  Smile


User currently offlineAcidradio From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1874 posts, RR: 10
Reply 21, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1327 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Maybe Salman Rushdie and Britney Spears should travel together on the same airplanes. Or even better, Rushdie could headline on the Britney Spears tour.

Salman Rushdie actually appeared at a U2 concert once, I don't remember where it was though. In the middle of the song, Bono whips out a cell phone and is like, "yeah man, come on out here" and out walks Salman Rushdie for a couple seconds. Bono introduces him to the crowd and Rushdie quickly left the stadium after that.

"Satanic Verses" is actually about an aircraft being blown up by terrorists and details the stories of the two main characters while they are falling to the earth. Rushdie was inspired by the events of an Air India 747 being blown up off the coast of Ireland en route to Canada in 1985, as well as the 1985 TWA hijacking that ended up in Beirut. Shortly after publishing, Pan Am 103 was blown up over Scotland by Libyan terrorists. Look at http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/anglophone/satanic_verses/index.html for more details. Perhaps this could have something to do with an airline not wanting to transport Mr. Rushdie. Unfortunately, it's not his fault, he is not the terrorist, he just writes about them.



Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1140 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1323 times:

I think many of you are missing the point. AC is not refusing to carry Rushdie because they fear terrorist actions against him. They are refusing to fly him because any flight he flied on would incurr a lengthy security delay. Laura Cooke for AC said it could be up to 3 hours. From that point of view, of course it makes sense not to carry Rushdie. Is one paying passenger worth all that extra cost?

It's easy for WJ to say they'd carry him...they don't even fly to the US.



buhh bye
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16335 posts, RR: 56
Reply 23, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

WJ flies charters to LAS. Has done for years.

I can't see why Britney Speers would cause a similar security risk. Unless her silicon implants contained some kind of corrosive liquid that could endanger the flight if she leaked.

 Laugh out loud






Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (12 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1300 times:

Air Canada are a disgrace.

I assume that since Mr. Rushdie travels all over the world, there are some airlines that allow him onboard, unless he is flying his very own Falcon Jet (unlikely).

So what next? If some nutcase fundamentalist cleric decides to impose a hit order against journalists who expose them, or gays, or Pentagon officials, or feminists, will Air Canada decide to ban them all from their flights???

I guess an airline that is a monopoly (and a loss making one to boot), can say or do anything it pretty much pleases. Thank goodness for the facsimile of free competition we have here in the States !!!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
S7 Refuses To Carry The Sacred Fire To Novosibirsk posted Mon Apr 24 2006 14:01:33 by Tu204
Air Canada Service To NGO Canceled? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 03:21:03 by Simairlinenet
Air Canada Seeks To Operate Some USAirways Flights posted Mon Oct 10 2005 19:52:02 by KarlB737
Air Canada Coming To Memphis posted Wed Oct 5 2005 01:20:13 by Dc10heaven
Air Canada Back To GVA? posted Fri Jul 15 2005 15:23:04 by Legallykev
Air Canada Coming To YHM posted Fri Jun 3 2005 04:27:47 by Fly_yhm
Air Canada Rumoured To Start YYZ-LIS Service posted Thu Apr 14 2005 06:16:21 by RicardoFG
Air Canada Back To FCO posted Tue Apr 5 2005 23:04:19 by YYZACGUY
Air Canada Pressured To Cancel Embraer Order? posted Tue Mar 22 2005 06:23:40 by TheHangarCat
Air Canada Service To SXM posted Tue Dec 14 2004 00:01:06 by NorthwestEWR