Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Washington's National Airport?  
User currently offlineUAPilot7 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 338 posts, RR: 1
Posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1110 times:

Why isn't Washington RR National airport an internationlal airport. I asked why Albany was an international airport a long time ago, and I was told because airlines fly through Albany to Canada, it is considered international flights, making the airport international. Well, Air Canada has DCA-Canada flights! Why is DCA not international too? And the stupidest thing, at 9pm, DCA turns off the monitors (that report landings, delays, etc.), even though the airport closes at 11pm!

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSwafueler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 985 times:

DCA has no U.S. Customs. Plus they are in the heart of D.C. They don't want Int'l flights coming in with close approach access to the White House. That's why you have Dulles and BWI.

User currently offlineHypermike From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1001 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 985 times:

Is it true that heavies can't land at DCA?

I've never seen a Delta 767 at DCA, and there are very few cities where you can't see a DL767 sometime throughout the day.


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 982 times:

DCA's longest runway is only about 7,000 feet, which isn't long enough to obtain high enough takeoff weights needed for longer-haul flights. Not only that, widebody aircraft are prohibited there, and narrow-bodied aircraft can only go so far. Let's also not forget about the perimeter rule, which limits flights to points no further than (I recall) 1,250nm. DCA does have some flights to Canada (Toronto and Montreal) I think, and US Customs isn't needed at DCA for the inbound flights because passengers for these flights "pre-clear" US Customs before boarding the aircraft in Canada.

So, even though DCA has a couple of international flights, there are so many restrictions involved with operating at the airport that it will never be a major international airport like JFK, SFO, MIA, or LAX.


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11342 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 979 times:

The reasons why DCA is not an international airport seem to be spelled out nicely in earlier replies. It is noteworthy that there is nothing special about having the word "international" in your title. It just means an international flight (as in outside US and Canada) can land there. You'll see a whole bunch of little tiny airports along the Mexican border that are called international airports since every now and then a Cessna from south of the border will land there. Other much smaller cities like Huntsville Alabama claim international airports as well.


About the widebodies. Are you sure about that OPNLguy? I've been wondering for a while if that's really the case since LGA has similar runway restrictions and a perimeter, however, 767s and L1011s even operate there. One of the design requirements imposed by AA for the DC10 was that it had to fly from LGA. I figured they didn't go to DCA because it wasn't a very good use for them with the perimeter, and so they were used elsewhere. I guess widebody wakes would probably also wreck havoc with the famous Shoot-the-Potomac approach.

Last summer during one of our crazy thunderstorms, a DC10 from Chicago to BWI arrived and found the airport closed, and unable to land. Being a UA jet, Dulles was of course the best option for diversion. When it got there, a new cell popped up, and it couldn't land there either. By now, the fuel reserves are approaching their legal safe limit, meaning Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and Richmond were too far away to reach legally. So, the plane diverted to National, and I guess everyone was bussed to B-more. I believe the plane was then flown out to B-more without the passengers and cargo.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineBo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 972 times:

That must have been one HELL of a tight landing.

User currently offlineWentOnA777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 968 times:

Regarding DCA's monitors....I don't think they are shut off at 9 PM. I have flown into DCA on flights after 9 (one was after 10) in the past few months, and the monitors were still on (but showing very little activity).

--Jacob


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11342 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 966 times:

I knew someone who was on another plane, and he saw it come in, and it scared the green eggs and ham out of him. He was an experienced flier and knew that DC10s just don't land there.

I would expect though that it wasn't that tight. The plane was very light after a long nearly exhaustive trip.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineBo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 964 times:

But theoretically, assuming no rejected takeoffs, etc, what is the largest possible aircraft that could land at DCA under normal conditions....i.e. with normal load of pax and cargo---not just an empty ferry flight?

User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5055 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 962 times:

I have seen 757s and A320s land at DCA the last time I was there, 10/98.


Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 953 times:

About 99.9% sure DLX.

I seem to recall that Eastern got a waiver to try their new A300s in there years ago, but it obviously didn't last and their 757s ended up being much quieter and I'm sure it better pleased DCA's neighbors.

Re: the DC-10 that diverted in there a couple of years ago, DCA wasn't an authorized DC-10 alternate for the intended IAD destination. BWI was, and when unable to get into there, he went to DCA presumably on his emergency authority. Ironic thing is that he also probably diverted to Andrews AFB (a stone's throw from DCA) since most airlines can designate military airports as alternates and actually divert to them if needed. There wouldn't have been any United folks there, obviously, but it sure wouldn't have taken long for some to get there from DCA with fresh paperwork for the flight back to IAD once they got fuel at Andrews and the weather at IAD improved.


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11342 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 951 times:

OPNLguy, are we talking about the same incident? The one I'm refering to happened less than a year ago (I'm pretty sure summer 99) and it was the daily DC10 ORD-BWI. I spot in DCA and BWI, and I see this flight often when I'm there in the early evening. It really resonated with me considering that I had seen this flight many times at BWI.

It was really neat reading a newsgroup article from a startled DCA flier that afternoon, and then hearing it on WJLA that night. Not often i get news from the newsgroup before the TV-news.   Anyways, the TV-news was consistent with my thoughts that the DC10 was inbound to BWI, rerouted to IAD, then rerouted to DCA. (I seem to remember a mention of Andrews, and how it wasn't available for some reason or another. Maybe the POTUS was there. )



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 956 times:

I had the destination and alternate reversed. ADW would have still been a better alternate (assuming Bill wan't there), and DCA personnel still could have taken paperwork over. Besides, over at ADW, those pesky newsgoons never would have gotten close enough to take a picture.

Funny thing was that the dispatcher for this flight had used Harrisburg PA (MDT) as the alternate, less than 100 miles to the north of BWI, and I've never heard much of an explanation for why the crew didn't go there...


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11342 posts, RR: 52
Reply 13, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 954 times:

BTW, have any of you guys checked out our new terminal? Ain't it pretty?   Too bad those republicans had to rename it. (I know many many Washingtonians that will never call it by its new name.)


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 950 times:

Last few times I was at DCA, I came in on Delta and they were sharing the interim terminal (old hanger) with USAirways, and new terminal was getting close to completion. Hope to make it there in April or May on buisness, and can't wait to see it.

User currently offlineWentOnA777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 956 times:

DLX,

The new terminal is very nice. (Except for the color...banana yellow is my color of choice) I love going up there, it's a great place to spot. In fact, I think I'll even be going out there tomorrow!

--Jacob


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11342 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 946 times:

You must be talking about Gravelly Point! That is the best place I've seen anywhere for spotting aircraft. Its really a shame that only smaller jets fly into National. You can go and stand on the centerline of the glidepath, and the planes look like they are about to land on your head! Usually when I go there, I find many people jogging, playing ultimate, soccer, or even softball. I always think that the planes are so close that a high fly ball could hit one. (I don't think they're really as close as they look though.)

As for the terminal, Its all glass and steel now (very fitting for an area called Crystal City), except for the south terminal which is the original. I've heard people complain about the yellow steel, but I really like it. It complements the blueish glass well.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineWentOnA777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (14 years 8 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 944 times:

DLX,

Yes, I was talking about Gravelly Point. It is so relaxing to sit out there for a few hours and listen to my scanner. The only thing that annoys me is the "airport know-it-alls," you know, the fathers telling their wives/children info about the airport, and it is ALL COMPLETELY WRONG!! Anyway, it is still a great spot!

--Jacob


User currently offlineBo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (14 years 8 months 16 hours ago) and read 938 times:

Another interesting thing about DCA is that the new terminal design is absolutely killing off commercial activity inside the airport. Since its such an easy transition from check-in/security to gate these days, people aren't stopping to buy useless trinkets or pork up on Burger King hamburgers much anymore.

Gravelly point is one of the most easily-accessible airport spotting areas in the country. Its even more fun when they turn the runway around and those 727's come roaring by with their ear-splitting concerto. Its rather "uplifiting".


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Washington Ronald Regan National Airport Saftey posted Mon Jun 7 2004 00:34:35 by Kcrwflyer
Brussels National Airport 2006! posted Tue Jan 31 2006 16:25:55 by SNBA
Changes At National Airport posted Sat Jan 1 2005 16:57:36 by Dcbat2072
Brussels National Airport posted Thu Dec 2 2004 13:58:46 by SNBA
General Aviation At National Airport posted Fri Sep 17 2004 13:02:37 by Dcbat2072
General Aviation At National Airport posted Tue Jul 27 2004 13:54:11 by Dcbat2072
America West At Washington National (CMH?) posted Fri Mar 14 2003 19:28:14 by Atcboy73
Reagan National Airport (DCA) posted Sun Jun 23 2002 23:44:58 by Fly_emirates
Regan National Airport posted Thu Apr 18 2002 05:15:26 by Hamad
Frontier Airlines Re-starts Washington National posted Thu Dec 13 2001 00:23:28 by BA