Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What's The Deal With Bur?  
User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

Ok great news from BUR, new Aloha service from HNL on the 737-700. Ok we all heard this but now I have some questions.

If this 737 has the range to do this, what is stopping carriers from flying to routes such as ORD, IAD or NYC. There is definately a market, as many people in the San Fernando Valley would prefer BUR to LAX. In the past the excuses have been the aircraft cannot take off on such a short runway, but if the Aloha plane can do it, why couldn't an airline such as United or American.

American could use its MD-80s to ORD. Really, how much further is it from DFW anyways?

United could use the A320 or at least A319 to reach ORD, JFK, EWR or IAD. Most likely ORD or IAD, yet the valley could benefit from a New York flight.

Even Southwest could launch a BUR-MDW flight using the 737-700.

The space is there. AA's gate is deserted after 9AM until boarding for teh 3PM flight, and then nothing after that. I'm sure UA isn't too crowded. They have an entire wing of the terminal and only have to share it with Alaska.

So saying UA and AA use the A319 and MD-80 on these flights I see no restrictions that shouldn't apply to Aloha as well.

Please someone enlighten me to the answer: why doesn't Burbank have flights to the nations major cities east of the Mississippi?

Thanks
-aio86

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJabpilot From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 423 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1122 times:

As a 33 year BUR resident, I've also wondered why we are so underserved. In the past we were much better served with nonstop flights to ORD (AA and UA), STL (TWA), SLC (WA and DL). I can't figure out why UA or AA won't try ORD again.

AA currently has 3 flights daily to DFW and the loads are really good, wouldn't once daily to ORD make sense, or why SW won't try any expansion to the Midwest. I share your curiousity and am really looking foward to Aloha's new service.

Jeff

User currently offlineJonPaulGeoRngo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1115 times:

I would think that WN service to Midway has to be on the drawing board...

User currently offlineLanPeru From Peru, joined Jun 2001, 645 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1113 times:

FedEx lands a A300-600F daily, and if it lands it must take off, so I wonder too.

User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1101 times:

Good point, there is the FedEx A300. Plus UPS and I think DHL have 757 service out of BUR. Aren't those companies hubs far away, like in Kentucky etc. That's a whole lot further than ORD. Plus isn't a cargo plane full with cargo and fuel heavier than a passenger plane?

Jabpilot, I didn't know that BUR had service to STL and ORD in the past. That's interesting.

Please someone supply us with an answer.

-aio86


User currently offlineJabpilot From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 423 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

As for BUR-ORD in the past, UA served the route with a 767-200 and AA with the MD-80, both during the early-mid 80's.

FYI: Cargo... FedEx, UPS, Ameriflight and AirNet all serve BUR but no DHL. They wanted to start service about 1-2 yrs. but plans fell through and I think it was over their choice of aircraft the 762 (lack of ramp space).

Jeff

User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8904 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1070 times:

First we should wait for the economy to rise. After that though, I could see Continental possibly starting BUR-EWR on the 737-700. They should be able to get at least 757s off fine for transcons, as SNA can pull it off to ATL and EWR (I think) on the 757, and BUR has its runways longer than SNA's 5700 ft strip.

Jeff


User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1065 times:

If anyone's been to BUR recently (which I'm sure you have Jeff) you'd realize there is no space at BUR for any new carriers. I'm sure Aloha will be using United's gates and maybe check in counters too. I don't know how realistic it'd be for Continental to start up opps for the first time at BUR. I suppose they could use America West's space but it seems that they almost always have planes on the ground there. Especially seeing as they only have one or two gates. Do CO and HP share space at any other airports? PHX? LAS? IAH? EWR? CLE?

SNA's flights to EWR go on 737-700s of CO. There are 757s though flying from SNA to Atlanta, Chicago, San Fransisco, Denver and Dallas on American, United and Delta.

-aio86


User currently offlineFedExHeavy From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 226 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1057 times:

Aloha service to BUR from Hawaii, Woooo Hoooo!, maybe this will be a wake up call for other airlines to start service BUR or for some to re-start. With all this talk for slot space at LGB, perhaps they will look at BUR as well!
Have a nice day!
FedExHeavy



So far this is the oldest I've been.
User currently offlineFedExHeavy From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 226 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1055 times:

I don't see why service to the midwest couldn't be successful, since LAX is a bear and ONT might a trek for some. A new airline coming in would probably use the UA gates and AA, maybe HP too, but there doesn't seem to be lot's of time to sit. Maybe Amtran could start service to MDW, I know that's a long shot but it would be cool. What about Delta Connection service, wasn't there service that was supposed to happen between SLC-BUR, but it fell apart because of 9/11?
Have a nice day Smile/happy/getting dizzy!
FedExHeavy



So far this is the oldest I've been.
User currently offlinePlanenutz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1053 times:

I had read somewhere, years ago, that BUR is "capacity controlled" (similar to slot controlled at other airports) for two reasons. First, its proximity to residential areas on all four sides, and seond, because one of the runways is technically too close to the terminal building. The FAA granted BUR a waiver for the latter years ago under certain conditions.

So, I'm thinking that ALoha is able to start its new service to Hawaii because one of the other carriers at BUR dropped a flight, freeing up capacity.





Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What's The Deal With Z-ARL At EMA? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 21:32:00 by NoelG
What's The Deal With These Pilot Seats? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 21:52:40 by Cumulus
What's The Deal With FLG611A? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 05:32:38 by AlexPorter
What's The Deal With This Picture? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 23:42:14 by SkyHigh777
What's The Deal With Australian Airlines? posted Tue Apr 4 2006 01:43:13 by Bakestar
What's The Deal With The Wright Amendment? posted Tue Jan 31 2006 20:48:13 by MrPhoo
What's The Deal With GoJet Airlines? posted Wed Oct 5 2005 16:13:15 by WestIndian425
What's The Deal With Engine Choices? posted Wed Jul 27 2005 19:04:52 by Glom
What’s The Deal With That New ATC TV Commercial? posted Sun Jul 17 2005 22:25:08 by FlyingTexan
What's The Deal With The Stands In This Pic? posted Wed Jun 29 2005 06:43:36 by ETStar