Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Interesting 9/11 Article  
User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1482 times:

Sorry if this has already been posted, but I found this article online and it mentioned Airliners.net and a user or two that I thought I saw around here a few times.

-----------------------------------------------------
Plane Crash Into World Trade Center Was Debated Months Ago

9/13/2001


CARBONDALE – Almost a year ago, a sophomore at Southern Illinois University (SIU) majoring in aviation management and flight responded on a message board to a post questioning, "Anyone wanna bet that the World Trade Center could survive an 767-300 impact?"
The discussion originator, a student who on the site goes by the user name "MD-90," also claimed in that same post: "When the two towers that make up the World Trade Center were built, they were designed to withstand the impact of the largest airliner of the day: the Boeing 707 Intercontinental."

The SIU student, who asked ePrairie to remain unnamed, knew otherwise, and in light of Tuesday's events, was correct: "My bet is NO WAY!!!," the student countered. "Just imagine a fully loaded airliner the size of the 707 (for modern comparison reasons, let's say a 757) slamming into any building. THINK ABOUT IT!!!"

This type of discussion is currently being taken very seriously by our FBI, which is spearheading the investigation into Tuesday's attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. "We treat [online information] just like anyone who calls with information," said FBI spokeswoman Mary Lynn Muha in Chicago. "We look at every single thing that occurs."

Airliners.net, the site hosting the posts, was created by site editor and operator Johan Lundgren of the Luleå University of Technology in Sweden. The posts do not come to him by surprise.

"I honestly believe [MD-90] is just a kid who's asking a question. That he mentioned the WTC and Boeing 767 is, in my mind, coincidental," Lundgren said. "We have close to 500,000 posts in the civil aviation forum alone. It seems reasonable that a discussion about an aircraft hitting a high building should come up at some time. I do not know the guy however, and therefore cannot be sure."

Following the SIU student's rebuttal of MD-90's initial thought, a debate ensued by several other users from around the world – some aviation-savvy and some not, some anonymous and some quite revealing – but all seem prophetic given that the discussion took place nearly a year ago.

That day, on Nov. 30, 2000, the SIU student, who on the site goes by the user name "KonaB777," was doing exactly what millions of others do every day – posting messages similar to the thousands of other discussions that take place on Yahoo! message boards.

From this point forward, the SIU student hopes the country can begin the healing process: "Personally, I'd like to see three towers built in their place, with the middle one much taller than the other two. That way, it would look like a giant middle finger, directed straight at the [expletive deleted] who did this."

By ADAM FENDELMAN
Associate Editor
Personal Technology Reporter
adam@eprairie.com
AOL/AIM screename: PureAdam11




Create your own luck.
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3829 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Actually, someone did post this article several months ago shortly after the terrorist attacks.

Here is the original thread where the speculation took place about what would happen to the World Trade Center if it was hit.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/336291

As a side note, I think this particular thread holds the record for having been viewed the most times. 137,698 views for the starting post (so far).

LoneStarMike

User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1345 times:

LoneStarMike-
I appreciate the clarification...I was on "hiatus" from this site for about a year, so I wasn't sure if it had been posted or not.

Thanks--
NWA Man



Create your own luck.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Interesting TSA Article posted Tue Feb 7 2006 23:38:12 by N723GW
Interesting UA Article/Tilton Interview posted Sun Feb 5 2006 16:22:42 by Mattnrsa
Interesting Delta Article ... posted Mon Aug 22 2005 21:03:10 by Litz
Interesting WN Article posted Wed Mar 23 2005 04:38:41 by UAL-Fan
Interesting AA Article! posted Mon Jul 26 2004 14:49:24 by Luv2fly
Interesting 9/11 Diversion posted Fri Jun 4 2004 18:32:39 by Js
An Interesting USAToday Article posted Tue Jan 13 2004 04:21:07 by Rsmith6621a
Interesting Concorde Article posted Tue Sep 23 2003 22:17:36 by Luv2fly
Incredible 9/11 Article posted Wed Oct 23 2002 04:51:43 by Sleekjet
USA Today 9/11 Article posted Mon Aug 12 2002 11:10:59 by Jplenny