BA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11150 posts, RR: 60 Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2076 times:
The concept of service in the US has changed significantly from Europe.
Basically in the US, they want to get you to your destination on time and efficiently. They don't care about all the luxuries.
In Europe and other countries, they still believe in treating you like a king. They expect for you to expect excelent and quality service when you do business with them.
So basically when you fly on a foreign carrier you are paying for 2 things, transportation to your destination, and the good service. While in the US it is mostly just transportation to your destination.
We have changed quite a bit from the rest of the world. You won't see stewards and stewardesses wearing shorts on foreign airlines like you see on Southwest.
Although generally in whole, airline service has dropped since the golden days. During the good old days of the DC-3, Lockheed Constellation, etc. you had big comfortable seats with PLENTY of legroom. Now in order to get that sort of service you have to fly First Class. Even nowadays, First Class isn't as comfortable as the seating was in the golden days for air travel.
During the Flying boats days, you would have your own room with bathroom and sink.
It's completely changed now. These days airlines want your money, get you where you want to go quickly and promptly, and dump you and take on a load of other passengers.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Watewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2058 times:
Air travel experience in US is unlike elsewhere. Flying is not a luxury- it's another form of mass transportation. I find it ridiculous how many users abroad blast US airlines' service when the market these airlines serve is so fundamentally different from other foreign carriers.
Personally, I don't care about the inflight service. Just get me there cheap and on time. Btw, I just booked BUF-FLL for $40 one-way. Try to find that kind of deal with your spoon-feeding int'l carriers.
QFTJT From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 278 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2055 times:
Probably the increase in operating cost and competition.
I've just come back from he USA and flew XNA Fayetteville AR to LAX via DFW on AA and there wasn't any entertainment or food and drinks.
Sorry to go off topic but one thing that must be discussed about in the excessive amounts of security at all US airports. Not only was my entire bag searched at check-in, but I also was search again at the security checkpoint and at the gate. All international passport holders were searched, regardless.
This was then repeated again at DFW. I was starting a 30-hour trip back to Australia and these security searches were excessive. I can understand the reason but they shouldn't be searching so many times, especially families with children. These searches also delayed the flights.
ThirtyEcho From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1638 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2037 times:
All I know is that the few times that I have flown in Europe the prices have been outrageous. There didn't seem to be any concept that flying was for the masses. I'd prefer a good cheap seat on WN to save the money for a great restaurant at my destination.
And I do remember the "Golden Age" of airline travel. Twelve hours coast-to-coast, no ability to climb above the weather, frequent unscheduled refueling stops due to adverse winds, no direct routing from ATC, limited weather radar, lots of noise and vibration and unpressurized DC-3s with no air conditioning.
Wingman From Spain, joined May 1999, 2021 posts, RR: 5 Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days ago) and read 1993 times:
Trust me, within 5 years you won't notice the difference between Euro and US service levels. Ryanair, Easyjet and the rest of the madly successful no frills carriers will see to it. Enjoy the service while you can you mama's boys, because soon enough you'll be eating chicken feed in the slop house just like the rest of us. But you'll also be paying about 1/2-2/3 the fare. So look at the bright side.
SWAbubba From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 154 posts, RR: 1 Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 3 days ago) and read 1972 times:
Prior to 1978 the airline industry in the US was regulated so that the government set all air fares for carriers flying in more than one state. After deregulation in 1978 airlines were free to set their own prices. The reduction in service occured gradually after that, for the simple reason that people aren't willing to pay for it.
Airline travel is generally a commodity now. People want to get from point A to point B on time and for the least amount of money. That's why Priceline, Hotwire, and the other discount web sites are doing so well. Few people really care which airline they're on as long as the ticket is cheap. Frequent flyer programs are designed to keep people flying one airline instead of taking the cheapest fare every time. It's one of the only ways to distinguish one airline from the others.
Delta777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 654 posts, RR: 1 Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1948 times:
you`re exactly right Wingman. And, what about Midwest Express and jetBlue? go to epinions.com and take a look at what the top 4 airlines are... Midwest Express (American), Singapore Airlines, Virgin Atlantic (British), and jetBlue (American). Some major airlines in America have bad serice, and some have great service! BTW, does Cathay Pacific have live DirecTV and leather seats in economy like jetBlue? Do they have 2-2 seating in economy like Midwest Express? I know people are going to be all over me after this post, but i don`t care.
Cyprus-turkish From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 199 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1902 times:
If you are flying domestic just for a few hours, the food and the amenities might not be so important, and you might be able to put up with American or United. However, if it is a transatlantic flight for 9 hours, you want to make sure that you are well taken care of. And this is when you chose Virgin Atlantic over American. And the price difference is not to American's advantage.
Meechy36 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 311 posts, RR: 0 Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1885 times:
Someone above mentioned Jetblue, Midwest Express, Singapore and Virgin as carriers with great service, yes they do, they are small enough to still be able to, here at AA we have 259 Super 80's, I am willing to bet that is more than all 4 of those airlines fleets combined, when you have almost 1000 planes in the fleet it is not easy to have the same level of service that Singapore and Virgin which are primarily long haul, Midwest Express which is a niche carrier and Jetblue that has a dozen or so planes (prior to the IPO the other day), my point is if Virgin or Singapore was as large as a major airline there isn't any way they would be able to maintain the level of services that they do now and make a profit.
CVG777 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1251 posts, RR: 6 Reply 16, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1878 times:
I think that one reason why the European airlines have the higher service standards is that they also have to compete with the European railroad network. Many flights within Europe are quite short, and sometimes taking the train is just as convenient as flying, if not more so. Wasn't it a few years ago that Air France reduced or all together canceled its Paris to Brussels service because they couldn't compete with the train that got passengers to Brussels in about the same time?
In the US it is all about how economical the airline can make a flight. Granted, on longer flights there should be a meal or large snack service, but that is if the flight lasts, in my opinion, two hours or more and is during regular meal times. Right now there is reduced meal service because of the aftermath of 9/11, a bad economy, and fewer air travelers. I think that people can hold out without a meal for an hour or two. The US airlines don’t really have to compete with Amtrak or the rail system in the US because of the size of the country. It takes a couple of days to get cross-country on a train in the US. It takes a matter of hours on a plane, and people want what is convenient. In the US, the plane is more convenient.
In Europe, the airlines are trying to attract passengers away from the trains by offering higher service standards. On many shorter trips within Europe, flying or taking the train can be just as convenient, so the airlines that compete with the trains offer more amenities.
I am sure that there is more to the puzzle than just competition with the trains, but this has got to be a good part of it.
Cyprus-turkish From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 199 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1870 times:
Virgin Atlantic is a relatively small company when compared with AA or United, but i am sure its gorwth rate is much more impressive as it keeps adding destinations and adding more planes to its fleet. American's new orders are basically to replace the older ones, rather than for growth purposes. When was the last time AA added a major new destination to its time-table? I am pretty confident that AA and such carriers will head towards shrinking as they can not compete with the quality of Virgin, or the prices of Southwest and Jetblue.
Being innovative requires more than 36 inches of seat-pitch.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8 Reply 19, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1862 times:
In the 1970s airlines had to compete by offering various types of service. Some airlines offered free liquor, and others became known as the all steak airline. Airlines had to sell their inflight product as they were told where to fly. After de-regulation, the airlines no longer had to sell their inflight product as they could charge lower fares. Airlines like Southwest and so on amerged. These airlines, with a lower cost structure could charge a lot less for a flight and make it up in volume. I belive that Southwest charged $10 for tickets when they first started. The industry had changed as people were now flying for transportation, and the service aspect went away.
Nowadays, in the aftermath of September 11th, airlines need to cut costs. Most have reduced or cut meal service. United Airlines has made snack boxes the meal that they cater on midcons. Meals are still catered on transcons. Shorter flights have reverted to one or two beverage services.
Pecoua From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 299 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1849 times:
As a Flight Attendant, I have to tell ya....I miss serving food....my friends and I keep saying how much passengers bitched about it, and the minute it was gone it was even more trauma for them. I personally miss it since it keeps us busy during the long ORD-LAS flights. Everyone I talk to says not to expect it back anytime soon...but at least we will give you a free movie. Just try to remember not to fuss at the flight attendants on your next trip. It's not their fault that there are no meals and no nuts...if we had it, we'd give it to you. Maybe someday we'll get back to some normalcy...(is that a word?) Anyway, I will post if I hear anything about this lack of meal svc changing.
Delta777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 654 posts, RR: 1 Reply 22, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1837 times:
If a major airline added huge meal service back it would do absolutely......... nothing. same thing that happend with AA MRTC. everyone complained about not having enough room, and American gave their customers more room than any other airline, and people are not flocking to AA. sad but true, people just like to complain.
BA DC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2001, 145 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (11 years 8 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1832 times:
I think its to do with peoples expectations aswell. The big carriers in Europe, e.g. BA, AF, LH, SK were all state owned. People had pride in their state airline, and mostly still do. Therefore Europeans wouldnt accept being treated like cattle on the state airline. SOunds old fashioned but its still quite true. Also different areas of europe are different too, for example Scandinavia, people there would turn their noses up at cut price airlines, because they expect the service...this is unlike Britain,which has caught the stack 'em high sell it cheap disease from america. Give me the choice, i would rather go on BA than Ryanair.
I think American airlines are still learning lessons with intercontinental travel, and its shown by BA 744's on LHR-JFK, often having more Americans than British on, because the service is better on Euro airlines...i suppose its just what people are conditioned to expect.
I flew from LAX to YVR on Alaska Airlines and the service sucked, yet the price was still equivalent to a full fair BA euro flight...
Pecoua From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 299 posts, RR: 0 Reply 24, posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1769 times:
Hey guys and gals...
Yea YYZ717...we get lots of comments but for the most part, few folks are nasty...they just vent their dissappointment and that is totally understandable. You are right though, UA has always been a follower, and if one airline resumed food svc in one of our markets, you can bet your life we would start it again too.
I guess time will tell.
25 RogueTrader: At the risk of sounding like I'm accusing airline management of capitalizing on a tragedy....I have to say that it seems to me that many airlines have
26 Blink182: RogueTrader- I will agree with you on most, but not all. I think as long as the customers are willing to pay the extra money to sit up front on domest
27 Travelin man: While I do not disagree that there are aspects of service that need to improve on domestic US flights, I have to argue that it is not ONLY U.S. carrie
28 UALfa@jfk: I agree with Pecoua about how many of us at UA miss serving food. And what I REALLY miss (don't laugh) is the number of coach pax that actually enjoye
29 Blink182: UALfa@jfk- Oddly enough, there really has not been an airline meal that I have seriously hated. AA served this pasta on a flight to YVR, it was so goo
30 LH423: Most US airlines are pretty good about you taking food on board. Just don't take anything smelly that will offend the other pax! This is true! Knowing
31 Blink182: LH423- True, you can bring food on board(which I do) but it isn't like choosing between the chicken or the fish! Also, I can't believe you brought Cin
32 Yyz717: I feel guilty actually at bringing 'elaborate' food on board a flight such as MCD or even a sandwich, so lately I'm happy to just risk getting a littl
33 Airzim: Fly CO, they didn't cut their meal service.
34 Clipperhawaii: CHEAP FARES = CHEAP FRILLS Simple actually. Why is this so hard for the traveling public to figure out?
35 SegmentKing: Since when has Continental really had much of a meal service? Pecs---> the ORD/LAS service is so bad that I'll fly LAS-LAX-ORD... plus my chances of b