Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CI197 'almost' Crashed Into Building In KHH  
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1994 times:

China Airlines flight CI197 'almost' crashed into a bank building in Kaohsiung while in landing process on April 16. However, China Airlines has denied about such incident and said it was the differences of viewing.

The eyewitness said CI197 was preparing to land at KHH around 2300LT. Pilot's obeservation thinks that the head of the plane didn't face the runway properly, and decided to go around. During the go-around process, the eyewitness said it almost smashed into the building belongs to "Land Bank." (a name for the bank)

KHH authority explained that there's nothing unusual and the plane has successfully left KHH the day after. CI official said the plane lowered its altitude by 400 to 500m, which might causes the people to have false impression that the plane almost smashed into the building.


12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1827 times:

No one has comments?

User currently offlineBobcat From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

I was going to say "OH MY GOD!"

but then I realized it's China Airlines....

just another "routine" flying stunt
by a brave CI pilot....

no real surprise there  Big grin



User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

If you fly CI your are a brave person !!

User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

Yay, I'm a brave person, I flew them twice, I'm double brave!

It's obvious peoepl got the wrong impression of it, must of been hard to see, especially at night. If someone got off the flight at the (now closed) Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong, I wouldn't be suprised if people kepts saying "we nearly crashed!"  Smile

Trevor



People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1696 times:

As Trevor commented, if people are not familiar with old Kai Tak at Hong Kong, they'll swear that this plane is about to crash!!

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Gordon Ho



'949


User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12595 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

To lose one A300 is unlucky, to lose two is careless; to lose three is . . . CAL?

Oh ye of little faith; of course, they were nowhere near a building; they just happened to be about 400-500m lower than they should have been on approach; nothing to worry about at all.


User currently offlineCarnoc From China, joined Oct 2001, 875 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1520 times:

I can remember that there was a discussed topic about Air China (CA) VS China Airlines (CI) on a Chinese avaiation forum.

A registered user who worked for China Airlines and he is currently living in mainland China (a real frequent flyer with Air China) posted the greatest advantages of Air China & China Airlines:

Air China: High Standard Safety Record (compared to CI)

China Airlines: High Standard Onboard Service (compared to CA)

Air China & China Airlines mostly same standard aspects:
* Public Relatios
* Catering Service
* Ground Service
* Frequent Flyer Program


User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6641 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

I'll have safety over service any day thank you!!!

As the CI spokesperson has said, 'nothing unusual'!!!


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1493 times:

I've never flown China Airlines but by all accounts their service onboard is pretty decent. However, their safety record isn't!! This incident isn't a big deal. It may look like it almost crashed into the building from someone's point of view on the ground, but it was at night & I don't think it could've been that close or else wouldn't there be other people voicing their complaints about how close the plane was to the building?

Check out these cool China Airlines pictures at Kai Tak:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Olaf Jürgensmeier




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kipps Cheung




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kipps Cheung



Hkg82.


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1866 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1442 times:

Kaitak:

I'm not arguing with about CI's safety standard, but there were two Airbus crashes at CI, not three.


User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4757 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

For those of you unfamiliar with the CI A300-600 crashes, you might like to know that they crashed in similar circumstances in Nagoya (Apr 26 1994) and Taipei (Feb 16 1998).

Both instances, a/c decided to go-round at the last minute during the final phase of approach. Both a/c hastily climbed... in fact the first Airbus in Nagoya climed so fast that the tower controller speculated the speed to be 1500ft within a few seconds. Both Airbuses stalled after a steep climb leading to catastrophic crashes.

The difference between the 2 is the one on Nagoya had its gears down, with the pilots arguing whether they should indeed go-round. Whereas the one in Taipei had its gears up.

The one in Nagoya stalled because the nose was pitched too high and the airspeed dropped to below 80knots, a/c could not be recovered in time and smashed into the ground, aft tail cone and main landing gears first...

The one in Taipei obviously had decided to go-round with its gears up but made wild turns at the airport boundaries after rapidly climbing to an alarming 1000ft (airspeed was unregisterable at this point), a pitch of 40deg nose up then down, and a futile almost-recovery just before the plane hit the ground, just like Nagoya.

There were speculations that someone on board the CI Airbus in Taipei was using a handphone while the a/c was on approach, thus interfering with the nav systems. But this was never proven.

Well, China Airlines has improved in terms of safety since then. Who would want lightning to strike twice? Especially when an airline is concerned? After those crashes, there has never been a safer time to fly with CI. Seriously, it has got all CI employees on their toes...

Lets not talk about the CI MD11 crash in HKG, bad decision by the pilot to land in typhoon...  Sad

Cheers
Ryan



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Yes, let's also not mention about the CI A340 taking off from the taxiway in Anchorage.

Anyway, I have flown on CI twice, once on their A300-600's and once on their 737-800, an dI have to admit, they are one of the best airlines I have ever flown with. There is no doubt that the service on board is exceptional. Safety is somethign they are strongly working on and I am glad to know that.

Trevor



People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JAL Almost Crashed Into A Mountain In HK posted Fri May 24 2002 06:25:09 by Jiml1126
Plane Crashes Into Building In NYC posted Wed Oct 11 2006 20:53:42 by UAL747
Airplanes Crashed Into Skyscrapers? (In The Past!) posted Sat Jul 31 2004 00:38:53 by Airconti
Ryanair Flight Almost Crashed, Aaiu Report posted Wed Dec 6 2006 07:14:24 by AirLittoral
Tug Runs Into ERJ In BOS posted Tue May 16 2006 04:23:18 by HighFlyer9790
Helicopter Crashed, VIP Died In Colombia posted Fri Feb 24 2006 21:01:07 by Bongo
Plane Crash Into A House In Roseville, Ca posted Sun Feb 12 2006 21:45:06 by Dstefanc
Delta Flights Into YYC In Past Two Days... Why? posted Sun Dec 18 2005 03:25:20 by Jamtide
Canadair Crashes On Building In Italy posted Fri Mar 18 2005 19:09:10 by CURLYHEADBOY
Big Building In This Pic posted Tue Feb 1 2005 04:05:40 by RampRat74