Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Assymetrical Engines  
User currently offlineVinovalentino From Canada, joined Nov 2001, 103 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 911 times:

I have a couple of questions. Today I was reading about the MDXX (in Giant Jetliners) and it appeared that one of the stumbling blocks was the inabality of the MD11 "banjo fitting" to accomodate a larger engine (without major $$$$).

1) Would it be possible to have a tri-jet with two symetrical engines on the wings and a different (smaller) engine on the tail?

2)Has this idea ever been proposed on a 4 engine aircraft? An example would be a an A340-600 with two different variants of Trent engines, ie two TRENT variants of 53,000 lbs and 65,0000 lbs thrust on each wing.

Perhaps a silly question but answers or thoughts would be appreciated

Dan


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 820 times:

I seem to remember that the classic Trident aircraft had a fourth smaller 'booster' jet engine installed just beneath the #2 engine. This was, I believe, was for 'hot & heavy' operations. And it was only an option...it wasn't standard equipment. Also, the B-47, in the beginning, had the two outboard engines of lesser thrust than the the four inboard engines. And let not forget the B-36...'six a-turning & four a-burning'.  Wink/being sarcastic Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineAreopagus From United States of America, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 1369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 787 times:

When the DC-10 was in the planning stages, one proposed design had one engine under one wing and two under the other. Now that would have been asymmetrical.

I seem to recall that MD sounded out the airlines in the 90s about the possibility of putting bigger engines under the wings than in the tail, but they wouldn't hear of having to maintain two different engine types on one aircraft.

Boeing was considering putting a bigger APU in the 777 that would produce thrust for takeoff, but when GE determined that the GE90 had room to grow to 115,000 lb. and more, the idea was dropped.


User currently offlinePW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2485 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 755 times:

Areopagus
What have you been on??????
One engine under one wing, and two engines under the other..????? Don't think so...although german wartime engineers did come up with quite some assymetric aircraft, several of which have been flown quite succesfully.

Anyway. To answer your question Vinovalentino:
From an operational point of view, an airline would not want two different type of engines under one aircraft. For fleet commonality [sp?] reasons, airlines tend to stay with the least number of engine-types possible, even over different aircraft types [B767, B747]. If possible at all, you want to reduce the number of aircraft types and the number of engine types in your fleet. Introducing another engine type in one aircraft is an absolute maintenance nightmare! No go!

However, besides the maintenance issue, there is absolutely no reason at all which would exclude a different engine spec for the #2 position on a tri-jet. No problemo at all. Please note that this is NOT considered as being assymetrical engine configuration!
Even Boeing was [and maybe still is] looking at this option to increase the 777 potential. The idea was to install a big ass APU, which would deliver several thousands of pounds of thrust [only required at take-off and initial climb sector], thereby increasing MTOW without going to even larger engines [115000 lbs+] under the wing. During cruise APU power would not be required.

Current commercial aircraft tends toward twins...which is not the most natural platform for assymetric engine installation....

PW100



Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
User currently offlineExpratt From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 744 times:

The Valsan conversion for the 727 had JT8D-200 engines on the pods and a D-17A engine in the center position.

On the Pratt powered 777, it is possible to install a 4077 in place of a 4090 engine. But before the airplane could fly, maintenance would have to adjust the shorting cap to the FADEC on the remaining 4090 engine to derate it to the 4077 thrust level.


User currently offlineVinovalentino From Canada, joined Nov 2001, 103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 723 times:

Dumbassymetrical.....

Thanks for the responses. In my infinite wisdom I came to realize that the term Assymetrical Engines would refer to a plane with say a 35,000 lbt engine on one wing and a 45,000 on the other. The examples I gave in my original post were in fact symetrical in that the left and right sides were equal.

Now what about a 777 a pod mounted Spey on the left side of the fuselage...That would be assymetrical... and ugly.. and silly... and...




Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Latest US Air 321. What's With IAE Engines? posted Mon Aug 31 2009 10:16:01 by Richiemo
First A380 For Lufthansa Now With Engines posted Wed Aug 19 2009 18:48:22 by AeroplaneFreak
Double Rear-mounted Engines posted Fri Jul 24 2009 15:33:10 by LHCVG
Logo On Engines Of N828AW posted Mon Jul 20 2009 01:34:09 by Bkircher
The IL-96-400 With NK-93 Engines: A Hidden Winner? posted Fri Jun 26 2009 12:54:22 by NCB
GP7200- Expectations For 1500 Engines posted Thu Jun 18 2009 15:46:13 by Lumberton
787 With Trent 1000 Engines Have Started! posted Wed May 20 2009 21:11:56 by TwinOtter4Ever
DC-9 Engines posted Fri Apr 24 2009 19:15:15 by C5LOAD
Widebody Orders And Deliveries In 2008: Engines posted Thu Jan 15 2009 21:57:56 by PM
Which Airlines Use 777-300 With PW Engines? posted Fri Nov 7 2008 09:35:18 by LPSHobby